Save Burnet - Updates

update 116 - Five Days Left: Your October Action Checklist

10/02/26

Dear Followers,

Time is short. If you haven't already, please read yesterday's Update #115. It explains how the hearing works, which path fits you, and where to find the forms and links. Here's the short version.

If Your Well or Land Could Be Affected

Fill out the CTGCD's Request for Contested Case Hearing form. The District must receive it by Wednesday, October 7. Don't wait for the last day: complete it and turn it in on Monday, October 5, or Tuesday, October 6.

Hand-deliver it to the CTGCD office at 303 Bluebonnet Dr., Burnet, and ask for a date-stamped copy. If you email it to [email protected] instead, call (512) 756-4900 to confirm they received it.

Remember, you must also appear in person on October 14 and state that you oppose the application. Your request counts only if you do both.

If You're Not an Affected Party

Your voice still matters. Submit a public comment on the CTGCD website. Update #115 has the link and tips for writing it. Keep your comment about groundwater, because that is all the District can consider.

Mark Your Calendar: Wednesday, October 14

9:00 a.m. | Texas AgriLife Extension Auditorium, 607 North Vandeveer Street, Burnet

Wear your green SaveBurnet t-shirt, arrive early, and help us fill the room. Asphalt Inc. has asked for 242 acre-feet a year, and even the 190 acre-feet the General Manager recommends is about 62 million gallons a year from the Hickory Aquifer. The Board needs to see how many of us care about our water.

What You Can Do

Decide your path. Near FM 3509 with a well? Path A. Everyone else? Path B.

Path A: File the Request for Contested Case Hearing form so it is received by October 7, then attend on October 14.

Path B: Submit a short comment at centraltexasgcd.org/comments before October 14.

Mark your calendar: Wednesday, October 14, 9:00 AM, AgriLife Auditorium, 607 N Vanderveer St, Burnet. Wear your green SaveBurnet shirt.

Speak or support. Prepare a two-minute, groundwater-only comment if you want to speak, or simply come and fill a seat.

Bring a neighbor. Forward this update to everyone within a few miles of FM 3509, especially anyone with a well.

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Download the Request for Contested Case Hearing Form
Submit a Comment to CTGCD
Sign up for Weekly Updates

update 115 - October 14 Meeting & Which Path Is Right for You?

10/01/26

Which Path Is Right for You?

Request a contested case hearing or submit a comment? A simple guide to the CTGCD preliminary hearing

Dear Followers,

The date is set. The Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) has posted notice of a preliminary hearing on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, on Asphalt Inc., LLC's large well operating permit application for its two Hickory Aquifer wells at 3221 FM 3509.

Many of you have asked the same question: "Should I file a request for a contested case hearing, or should I submit a comment?" The answer depends on one thing: whether you are personally affected. This update walks you through it step by step so every one of us takes the right path.

The Hearing at a Glance

What: CTGCD preliminary hearing, Asphalt Inc., LLC large well operating permit
When: Wednesday, October 14, 2026, at 9:00 AM
Where: AgriLife Auditorium, 607 N Vanderveer St, Burnet, TX 78611
Requested: Up to 242 acre-feet per year from two Hickory wells (185.5 + 56.5), about 78.9 million gallons a year
Recommended in the District's materials: 190 acre-feet per year, about 61.9 million gallons a year
Contested case requests due: Received by the District by Wednesday, October 7, 2026
Speaking time: Plan on 2 minutes per person

Are You Affected? Start Here

Ask yourself one question: Do I live near the proposed quarry on FM 3509 (0 to 5 miles out), have a water well, and worry that Asphalt Inc.'s round-the-clock industrial pumping could affect it? It is OK if you do not know which aquifer your well draws from.

YES, I'm affected

Take Path A: Request a Contested Case Hearing
•      Fill out the District's Request for Contested Case Hearing form
•      It must be received by October 7. Submitting your paperwork earlier than the 7th is recommended…. Don’t wait, do it now.
•      You must attend the October 14 hearing and speak briefly about how you are affected

NO, but I care

Take Path B: Comment Online and Show Up
• Submit a short comment on the District's website – See button below for the link.
• Come to the October 14 hearing to show support
• Speak if you wish, but you do not have to. You can wear your green SaveBurnet T-shirt and support those that are speaking.

Not sure which path fits? Contact SaveBurnet.com and we will help you decide. When in doubt, if you have a well near the site, lean toward Path A.

What Is a Preliminary Hearing?

The CTGCD operates under Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code. At a preliminary hearing, the Board typically does two things:

1. Hears public comment for, against, or about the application.
2. Considers any requests for a contested case hearing. A contested case hearing is a formal, trial-like proceeding with evidence, sworn testimony, and cross-examination. If the Board grants a request, the application moves into that process before any final decision. If no valid request is granted, the Board may go on to act on the permit.

Even a 190 acre-foot per year recommendation is roughly 169,000 gallons every day, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, pulled from the same aquifer system many of our families drink from. The District has said publicly that no permit may be approved that would "unreasonably affect surrounding landowners or cause a substantial adverse impact on the aquifer."

Path A: You're Affected. Request a Contested Case Hearing

Deadline: Received by Wednesday, October 7

Who should file: You live in the vicinity of the FM 3509 site (0 to 5 miles), you have a well (any aquifer), and you are concerned it could be impacted by Asphalt Inc.'s industrial-level pumping.

Where to find the form: The Request for Contested Case Hearing form (two pages) is available here, and on the SaveBurnet.com website:

Download the Request for Contested Case Hearing Form (PDF) →

The form asks for:
•      Your name, address, phone, and email
•      The applicant (Asphalt Inc., LLC) & the hearing date (October 14, 2026)
•      A "Yes" checked for requesting a contested case hearing
•      A short, specific statement of how the pumping would affect your well

Two rules you cannot miss:

1.     The District must receive your signed request in writing by Wednesday, October 7, 2026 (7 days before the hearing).
2.     You are required to appear in person at the October 14 hearing, where you will be able to state that you oppose the application and briefly explain how you are affected. A request is not valid without both.

Deliver or mail to: CTGCD, 303 Bluebonnet Dr. (P.O. Box 870), Burnet, TX 78611 | [email protected] | (512) 756-4900. We recommend hand delivery, or calling to confirm receipt.

Sample Statement for Your Form (and for October 14)

"I live at ___, about ___ miles from the proposed Asphalt Inc. wells on FM 3509. My family relies on a private water well, drawing from the Aquifer. It is our only source of water. I am concerned that the massive volume of water Asphalt Inc. plans to pump, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, will lower the water level in my well or cause it to go dry. This is a direct impact to my property and my family's water supply that is not shared by the general public. I oppose this application."

Keep it short and personal. If your water level dropped or your well had problems during Asphalt Inc.'s pump testing, add one sentence saying so.

Path B: Not Directly Affected? Comment Online and Come Out to Support

Step 1: Submit a comment on the District's website. The CTGCD has set up a public comment portal for this application. You'll need your name, email, and physical address. Link below.

Submit a Comment to CTGCD →

What to know about online comments:
•     Keep it short and to the point. A few sentences about groundwater is plenty.
•     You will not get a response back. That is normal.
•     Your comment goes into the District's public record. It is not legal evidence in the permit proceeding, but the Board and staff use comments to gauge public sentiment, and numbers matter.
•     Please submit before October 14 so the Board has it in hand at the hearing.

Step 2: Come to the October 14 hearing. If you would like to speak, you may give a two-minute comment following the rules below. Bring a printed copy to hand to the District.

You Don't Have to Speak to Make a Difference

Not everyone who attends needs to go to the microphone. Simply being in the room sends a powerful message. A full house tells the Board this community is watching.

Please wear your green SaveBurnet t-shirt so the Board can see how many of us are there together.

SaveBurnet will have designated speakers who will present the group's key groundwater concerns on behalf of all of us. You are welcome to come, sit, listen, and support.

Groundwater Only: This Is the Most Important Rule

Whichever path you take, this rule applies. The CTGCD regulates groundwater production and nothing else. In its own words, it "does not regulate quarry operations, mining activities, air quality, noise, traffic, blasting, land use, or other permits."

We share every one of those other concerns, and we are fighting them at TCEQ, LCRA, and the Capitol. But at this hearing, a comment about dust or blasting is a comment the Board cannot use.

DO talk about
•      Your well: depth, aquifer, how long your family has relied on it
•      Water-level drops or dry wells during the pump tests
•      Whether 190 (or 242) acre-feet is "reasonably necessary"
•      Effects on neighboring registered wells
•      Drought and long-term aquifer decline
•      Asking for strict monitoring, metering, and curtailment triggers

DON'T talk about
•      Air quality, silica dust, or health effects of dust
•      Blasting, noise, or vibration
•      Truck traffic or road safety
•      Stormwater runoff or surface water
•      Property values or zoning
•      Personal remarks about the applicant, staff, or Board

How to Make Your Two Minutes Count

Before you go
•     Write it out and time it. Two minutes is about 250 words. Practice once out loud.
•     Bring a written copy to hand to the District so it goes into the record word for word.
•     Arrive early to sign in or fill out a speaker card. Seating and parking may fill up.

At the microphone
•     Start with your name, where you live, and your distance from the site. If you have a well, name the aquifer if you know it.
•     Make one or two specific points backed by facts or your own experience.
•     End with a clear ask, for example: "I ask the Board to deny this permit," or "If a permit is issued, limit it well below 20 acre-feet per year, with mandatory monitoring of neighboring wells and automatic curtailment."
•     Stop when time is called. Staying within the limit earns the Board's respect for everyone who follows.

Decorum
•     Address the Board, not the audience or the applicant.
•     No clapping, cheering, booing, or signs that block views. Follow the presiding officer's instructions.
•     If someone already made your point, say "I agree with the previous speakers on ___," then add something new.
•     Be respectful of the Boards time.

Sample Two-Minute Public Comment (make it your own)
"Good morning. My name is ___ and I live at ___. I am here because the Hickory and other aquifers in this area supply drinking water to thousands of Burnet County families.

Asphalt Inc. has asked for up to 242 acre-feet a year. Even the recommended 190 acre-feet per year is about 169,000 gallons a day, every day, around the clock. During pump testing, neighbors near the site reported water levels dropping.

The District's own standard is that no permit may unreasonably affect surrounding landowners. I ask the Board to deny this permit, and if granted at 20 acre feet per year require real-time monitoring of neighboring wells and automatic cutbacks if water levels fall. Thank you."

Lesson for Burnet County
A room full of green shirts is powerful. A room full of people who take the right path, stay on topic, and respect the process is persuasive. The Board can act only within its authority, so let's give it exactly what it can use: clear, personal, groundwater-focused testimony.

What You Can Do

Decide your path. Near FM 3509 with a well? Path A. Everyone else? Path B.

Path A: File the Request for Contested Case Hearing form so it is received by October 7, then attend on October 14.

Path B: Submit a short comment at centraltexasgcd.org/comments before October 14.

Mark your calendar: Wednesday, October 14, 9:00 AM, AgriLife Auditorium, 607 N Vanderveer St, Burnet. Wear your green SaveBurnet shirt.

Speak or support. Prepare a two-minute, groundwater-only comment if you want to speak, or simply come and fill a seat.

Bring a neighbor. Forward this update to everyone within a few miles of FM 3509, especially anyone with a well.


Status Check
CTGCD operating permit application filed (May 2026), revised (July 2026)
Preliminary hearing noticed for October 14, 2026
Contested case hearing requests due to CTGCD by October 7, 2026
Public comments: online now, and in person October 14

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Sign up for Weekly Updates
Submit a comment to your legislators

update 114 - Property Rights Cut Both Ways (Part 2 of 2) : what texas law already says & a brief update on CTGCD permit

9/25/26

Dear Followers,

Last Friday, in Part 1, we laid out a simple idea through a few analogies — livestock odor, gunfire across a fence line, groundwater, dust, blasting. Your property rights are real, and they end at your neighbor's property line. This week: that's not just our opinion. Texas courts and the Texas Legislature have already said the same thing, more than once.

What Texas Courts Have Already Ruled

Dust and noise: In Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates (Tex. 2004), the Texas Supreme Court held that dust, odor, and noise become a legal nuisance once they "substantially interfere with the use and enjoyment of land" and cause "unreasonable discomfort or annoyance to persons of ordinary sensibilities" — and that this applies most clearly when the condition is ongoing and frequent, which is exactly the pattern being described near FM 3509.

Groundwater: In Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Day (Tex. 2012), the Texas Supreme Court ruled that a Texas landowner owns the groundwater beneath their own land as a constitutionally protected property right. That cuts both ways. Asphalt Inc.'s wells are theirs to use. But so is the Hall family's well, and so is the Ward family's well (#9961) — which went dry during Asphalt Inc.'s own pump-down testing this year. Draining a neighbor's protected groundwater isn't a side effect of doing business — under Day, it's arguably taking their property. This is exactly why House Bill 1633 (see Update #110) now requires the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District to specifically weigh effects on neighboring registered wells before granting any permit.

Blasting: Courts in many states have long treated blasting damage as a special case — holding operators responsible when a blast's concussion, vibration, or debris crosses onto a neighbor's land, regardless of how careful they were. It's the same fence-line principle as the firearms rule below, applied to dynamite. It's exactly why blasting near Camp Longhorn's trails, a few hundred yards from the property line, deserves hard limits, not assurances.

Firearms and dust — the same boundary, enforced by the same person: Texas Parks & Wildlife Code § 62.0121 makes it a Class C misdemeanor to knowingly discharge a firearm while hunting or shooting if the projectile crosses a property line, absent written consent from every landowner involved. To be clear, this isn't a claim that Asphalt Inc. plans to hunt on their 714 acres — it's the principle: Texas law already says a dangerous projectile doesn't get a free pass just because it started out on your own land. Airborne crystalline silica dust is dangerous in exactly the same sense — the National Cancer Institute and the International Agency for Research on Cancer classify it as a known human carcinogen, linked to lung cancer and silicosis. A bullet and a lungful of silica dust are both capable of real, lasting harm; one just moves faster and louder than the other. For 27 years, Sen. Pete Flores was the game warden — and eventually the Director overseeing all 532 of them — responsible for enforcing exactly the fence-line boundary that stops a bullet. Dust, water, and blast waves crossing a property line are the same principle he built a career on, just wearing a different hat.

Unfinished Business at the Capitol

Last year, State Rep. Terry Wilson filed House Bill 5151, amended by Rep. Ellen Troxclair, to set real distance protections for exactly this kind of facility — including buffers around youth camps like Camp Longhorn and state parks like Longhorn Cavern and Inks Lake. It cleared the House Environmental Regulation Committee on a unanimous 9–0 vote.

Then, on the House floor on May 15, 2025, industry opposition got it killed on a procedural technicality — a point of order that sent it back to the Calendars Committee, where it died without ever getting an up-or-down vote. It never even had the chance to fail on the merits. And because it never passed the House, no Senate companion was ever filed — the Senate never got the opportunity to weigh in at all.

On the House floor, Rep. Wilson put the whole argument in one sentence: "We always talk about the property rights of the operator — but what about the adjacent ranchers, some of whom have lived here for generations?"

Rep. Troxclair has already committed to bringing this fight back with a new House bill for the next legislative session. What's still missing is a partner in the Senate — filing at the same time, not waiting to see if the House bill survives first.

Why This Is a Natural Fit for Sen. Flores

We're not asking Sen. Flores to abandon anything he believes. We're asking him to apply it consistently. He's said plainly that if someone buys property, they should be able to do what they want with it — and we agree completely. Asphalt Inc. bought their 714 acres, and nothing about this campaign disputes their right to use it.

But that right ends exactly where it starts costing someone else theirs — the same line Sen. Flores enforced for 27 years as a Texas game warden and Law Enforcement Division Director. The small landowner next door, the century-old youth camp with kids on horseback, the families who have fished and camped at Inks Lake State Park for generations, and those who hike and visit Longhorn Caverns deserve that same protection — whether they own 3,000 acres or 3.

There's another piece of this worth understanding. The company that now leases this land to Asphalt Inc., Burnet Ranch Investments, LLC, purchased the property from its previous owner, HVPR4, in a transaction the seller says was never what it appeared to be. HVPR4's own public statement says they understood the property was being sold for a residential subdivision — and that they had no knowledge the buyer intended to operate a quarry, rock crusher, or asphalt plant on it. Whatever "property rights" argument gets made for this site, it's worth remembering that the very right to develop it was reportedly acquired by telling the seller something other than the truth. That's not the same kind of property right the small rancher next door is standing on.

The Kids Are Already Writing
While the adults debate permits and property lines, the kids who spend their summers at Camp Longhorn have already started writing letters — to Gov. Abbott, in their own words, in their own handwriting. Here are a few examples.

A Brief Update:
The Groundwater Permit Is Administratively Complete

The Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District has published a notice in the Burnet Bulletin. It says Asphalt Inc.'s application for a New Large Well Operating Permit (OP-26081401) is administratively complete. That means the application has checked every required box and can now go before the District's Board. Asphalt Inc. is asking for 241.95 acre-feet per year from the Hickory Aquifer, pumped from two wells at 3221 FM 3509, and the General Manager intends to recommend 190 acre-feet per year. A preliminary hearing is set for Wednesday, October 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at the Texas AgriLife Extension Auditorium, 607 North Vandeveer Street, Burnet. At that hearing, the Board will decide whether those who oppose the permit are directly affected and should be granted party status in a contested case. Written requests for a contested case hearing are due by Wednesday, October 7, and anyone who files must also appear in person on October 14. Next week we'll explain in detail how to prepare for the October 14 hearing, who may qualify to request a contested case, and what that request needs to include.

  What You Can Do

1   Send your comments to your legislators — Ask Senator Flores and his team to initiate a Senate Bill, details are on the SaveBurnet.com website.

2 Share this update and sign up for weekly SaveBurnet.com updates — especially with neighbors in Burnet & Llano Counties. That's the fastest way to get the Public Information Request results the moment we publish them.

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Sign up for Weekly Updates
Submit a comment to your legislators

update 113 - Property Rights Cut Both Ways (Part 1 of 2)

9/18/26

Update #113
Property Rights Cut Both Ways (Part 1 of 2)

Dear Followers,
Today we're kicking off a two-part series about something every one of us — and several of our elected officials — cares about deeply: property rights. It's a value worth defending loudly and without apology. But real property rights have always had two sides, and this week we want to walk through why.

Your Land, Your Rights — Right Up to the Fence Line

If you own land in Texas, you get to decide what happens on it. Raise chickens or cattle. Hunt on your own acreage. Drill a well. Run a business. Nobody should be able to tell you otherwise, and we're not asking anyone to.

But every one of those rights comes with the same built-in limit: it ends at your property line. The moment what you're doing on your land starts landing on someone else's, you've stopped exercising your right and started taking away theirs.

A few examples make it plain:

Raise all the livestock you want — but if the smell gets so bad it settles over the neighbor's porch every evening, you're not exercising a property right anymore. You're taking away theirs.

Hunt and target-shoot on your own property — that's your right. But Texas law has already drawn the line on what happens next: the moment a bullet crosses the fence line onto someone else's land, it's no longer a property right. Texas Parks & Wildlife Code § 62.0121 makes it a Class C misdemeanor to knowingly discharge a firearm while hunting or shooting if the projectile crosses a property line — full stop, unless every landowner on both sides has signed off in writing.

To be clear, this isn't about anyone hunting on the 714 acres proposed for this quarry. It's about the principle Texas law already applies: a bullet is dangerous, and it doesn't get a pass just because it started out on someone's own land. The same is true of what would actually leave that property — crystalline silica dust from crushing rock. The National Cancer Institute and the International Agency for Research on Cancer classify airborne crystalline silica dust as a known human carcinogen, tied to lung cancer and silicosis in people who breathe it regularly. It's every bit as capable of causing real, lasting harm as a stray bullet — the difference is it doesn't announce itself with a bang. Crush rock and make dust on your own property, that's your business. But when that dust crosses the fence line — onto a neighbor's land, into their lungs, or over a kids' summer camp — it's the same violation as the bullet, just slower and quieter.

Sink a well and pump your own groundwater — Texas law says that water is yours. But if you pump at industrial scale and dry up the well next door, you haven't used your water. You've taken your neighbor's.

Blast with dynamite on your own site — but when the concussion and vibration travel a few hundred yards onto land where children are horseback riding, that's not confined to your property either.

A Law Texas Already Wrote — Enforced by Someone We Know

That bullet-across-the-fence-line rule isn't a metaphor we invented. It's real, current Texas law — Parks & Wildlife Code § 62.0121, "Discharge of Firearm Across Property Line." And here's what makes it worth mentioning by name: for years after that law took effect, it was enforced by every one of the state's game wardens, under the command of their director — Colonel Pete Flores.

Sen. Flores spent 27 years as a Texas game warden, rising to lead the entire Law Enforcement Division of Texas Parks & Wildlife — overseeing all 532 of the state's game wardens — before retiring in 2012. Under his leadership, game wardens' mission was expanded specifically to include environmental crimes enforcement. The principle that your rights on your own land stop at your neighbor's fence line isn't an abstraction to Sen. Flores. It's something he spent a career enforcing, and something he personally helped extend into environmental law.

Why This Isn't Hypothetical for Us

Asphalt Inc.'s proposed 714-acre rock-crushing operation sits a few hundred yards from Camp Longhorn, where kids have gone horseback riding for three generations. It sits within a few miles of Longhorn Cavern State Park and Inks Lake State Park. And it sits next to ranch families and small landowners — some of whom have already watched their own wells run dry during Asphalt Inc.'s own pump-down testing this year.

This isn't an anti-property-rights argument. It's the opposite. We're asking our legislators to apply the same property-rights principle consistently — for the small landowner with a few acres, the century-old youth camp, the state park visitor, and the large out-of-state company alike. Real property rights protect everyone on both sides of the fence line, not just whichever side owns the bigger tract.

Just a few of the hundreds of letters campers and neighbors have already sent — more on these in Part 2.

Next Friday, in Part 2, we'll walk through what Texas courts have already ruled on dust, noise, and groundwater — and a bill that came within one procedural maneuver of protecting places like Camp Longhorn, before industry pressure killed it on the House floor. We'll also lay out exactly what we're asking Sen. Flores to do differently this time.

This is Part 1 of a two-part series — Part 2 arrives Friday, September 25.
  What You Can Do

1   Send your comments to your legislators — details on the SaveBurnet.com website.

2   Share this update and sign up for weekly SaveBurnet.com updates — especially with neighbors in Burnet & Llano Counties. That's the fastest way to get the Public Information Request results the moment we publish them.

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
  One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Sign up for Weekly Updates
Submit a comment to your legislators

Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.
Click the donate button below and then scroll down for instructions on how to donate
Donate Today

update 112 - See you tuesday, september 15 & a day we remember

9/11/26

Dear Followers,

Tuesday Is the Day — Be in the Room

Our free public meeting is this Tuesday, September 15, 2026, 6:00–7:30 p.m. (doors open 5:30 p.m.) at the AgriLife Extension Center, 607 N. Vandeveer St., Burnet, TX. Come hear where things stand with the proposed rock crusher and what each of us can do next.

Our featured speaker is Andrea Sparks, J.D., Director of Government and Strategic Relations at Buckner International and former Founding Director of the Texas Governor's Child Sex Trafficking Team. She'll join us to talk legislative strategy, grassroots power, and community protection. Snacks and water provided.

Bring a neighbor. A full room is the clearest message we can send to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District, TCEQ, and our elected officials that this community is watching and isn't going anywhere. We'll see you there.

Let's  Never Forget

Today we pause to remember. Twenty-five years ago, thousands of brave souls — first responders, everyday Americans, and members of our armed forces — gave everything on September 11, 2001. Firefighters and police officers who ran toward danger instead of away from it. Passengers who fought back. Neighbors who showed up for one another when it mattered most. We owe it to every one of them to make sure that day is never reduced to a date on a calendar — it deserves our memory, and our thanks, every year.

If you see a first responder or a member of law enforcement today, take a moment to thank them for their duty and their service. It matters more than they'll ever say — today, and every day.

  What You Can Do

1   Attend the Sept. 15 meeting at the AgriLife Extension Center — details above.

2   Share this update and sign up for weekly SaveBurnet.com updates — especially with neighbors in Burnet & Llano Counties. That's the fastest way to get the Public Information Request results the moment we publish them.

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.


Click here to Sign up for Weekly Updates

Click here to Submit a comment to your legislators

update 111 - TCEQ Permit revision nears final review & sept. 15 meeting is 11 days away

9/4/26

Quick reminder: Save the Date - Tuesday, September 15

Dear Followers,

Our free public meeting is Tuesday, September 15, 2026, 6:00–7:30 p.m. (doors open at 5:30 p.m.) at the AgriLife Extension Center, 607 N. Vandeveer St., Burnet, TX. Featured speaker Andrea Sparks, J.D. (Director of Government and Strategic Relations, Buckner International) will join us.

Snacks and water will be provided. Everyone is welcome — bring your neighbors! The more of us in that room, the stronger our voice with the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD), the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and our elected officials.

  TCEQ's Review of the Asphalt Inc. Permit Is Nearing a Decision

TCEQ's own AirPermits IMS tracking system (Project #412300, checked September 4, 2026) shows that a revision to Asphalt Inc.'s Standard Air Permit No. 176835 — the permit covering the “Burnet Crushing Plant” at 3221 FM 3509 — has moved into the final stage of internal review:

• Revision received by TCEQ: July 20, 2026

• Engineer's initial review completed: August 31, 2026

• Package sent to team leader/supervisor for review: September 3, 2026

• Package sent to section manager for final review: September 3, 2026

That appears to put the revision near the end of TCEQ's internal review process. TCEQ's public record doesn't say what Asphalt Inc. is asking to change — only that a revision is pending on an already-effective permit.

We don't know yet what's changing — and we're not going to guess. SaveBurnet.com has already filed a Public Information Request with TCEQ for the underlying review documents. TCEQ's typical turnaround means it will likely be a couple of weeks before we have that data in hand. We'll share exactly what it says the moment we get it.

Why this matters right now: This timeline tells us the revision has advanced quickly through TCEQ's internal review process. A decision could be approaching, which makes this an important time for our community to stay engaged.

  A Rule That Hasn't Changed Since 2008

Here's something worth putting directly in front of TCEQ, CTGCD, and our legislators: the Standard Permit for Permanent Rock and Concrete Crushers (30 TAC Chapter 116, Subchapter F) — the very rule TCEQ uses to evaluate crusher permits like this one — has been in effect since July 31, 2008. In the 18 years since, the only change was a narrow 2011 amendment (Senate Bill 1250) that removed a distance requirement for certain concrete crushers — it didn't add a single new protection.

Dust-control, water-recycling, and emissions-monitoring technology have all moved forward substantially since 2008. The rule TCEQ is applying to this permit has not moved with it.

The question is simple: should a rock crusher proposed for Burnet County in 2026 be governed by environmental protections largely written for the technology of 2008?

This is not a suggestion — it's the law working as designed: Texas Government Code § 2001.021 gives any person — or a community like ours — the right to formally petition a state agency to update its own rules. This isn't symbolic. TCEQ has an established process for receiving and responding to petitions like this. We believe it's time to use it.

  What You Can Do

1   1 Attend the Sept. 15 meeting at the AgriLife Extension Center — details above.

2   Contact Sen. Pete Flores and Rep. Ellen Troxclair. Ask them to (a) confirm CTGCD is enforcing House Bill 1633 (HB 1633) as intended — see Update #110 for our full breakdown of what HB 1633 requires — and (b) formally request that TCEQ open a rulemaking to update the 18-year-old rock and concrete crusher standard permit to reflect current best available control technology.

3   Ask LCRA who verifies rock berm and Best Management Practices compliance on-site — a question we put in writing and still haven't gotten a clear answer to. Whatever TCEQ decides, enforcement on the ground is a separate fight.

4   Share this update and sign up for weekly SaveBurnet.com updates — especially with neighbors in Burnet & Llano Counties. That's the fastest way to get the Public Information Request results the moment we publish them.

Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells, our children, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Click here to Sign up for Weekly Updates

Click here to Submit a comment to your legislators

Click here to read HB 1633

update 110 - Reminder of Sept. 15 meeting & HB1633

8/28/26

Reminder - Save the Date: Public Meeting, Tuesday, September 15

Dear Followers,
SaveBurnet.com is hosting a free, public community meeting on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, from 6:00–7:30 p.m. (doors open at 5:30 p.m.) at the AgriLife Extension Center, 607 N. Vandeveer St., Burnet, TX. Everyone is welcome — bring your neighbors.

Snacks and water will be provided. We will provide an update on our recent accomplishments. Our featured speaker is Andrea Sparks, J.D., Director of Government and Strategic Relations for Buckner International. Andrea has a wealth of knowledge and is a great speaker... you won't want to miss this meeting.

- Is your CTGCD ensuring compliance to HB1633?

HB 1633 Is the Law — Compliance Isn't Optional
House Bill 1633 passed the Texas House 146-0 and the Senate 31-0, and took effect September 1, 2025. It amended the Texas Water Code section that governs what a groundwater conservation district is legally required to weigh before granting or denying a permit.

This is not a suggestion. Under HB 1633, CTGCD is legally required to consider whether a new industrial permit would unreasonably affect wells that are registered with the District and exempt from the requirement to obtain a permit — the ordinary domestic and agricultural wells our neighbors have relied on for generations. That means CTGCD must ensure its internal review of the Asphalt Inc. application actually accounts for these wells, not just wells held by other permit holders.

We believe our community deserves a direct, public answer: is CTGCD applying this requirement to the pending Asphalt Inc. permit application, and can they show their work?

What We're Requesting
Beyond what the law requires, we are formally asking CTGCD for two things:

●       Account for Burnet County's growth. Burnet County is one of the fastest-growing counties in Texas. We are requesting that CTGCD's evaluation of this permit account for that growth over the life of the permit, rather than treating water demand as if it will stay flat for the next 30 years.

●       Expand the well-impact review radius. The current review radius used to assess affected wells is a bare minimum of one mile. We are requesting CTGCD expand that to a realistic five-mile radius, so the families who actually depend on this aquifer are counted.

How Many Wells Are We Talking About?
The applicant's own engineering firm, WESTWARD Environmental, has already documented 45 registered wells within just a one-mile radius of the proposed quarry site. Of those, the firm's own analysis identifies 3 as likely completed in the Hickory Aquifer — the same aquifer the quarry wants to pump from — meaning those wells are the most directly exposed to drawdown.

That's one mile. We don't yet have a confirmed count for the full five-mile radius, where hundreds of families draw their water. We're pursuing that number through public records, and we'll share it as soon as we have it.

One Industrial User, Seven Percent of the County's Water
CTGCD's own Management Plan — a public document, most recently adopted October 25, 2023 — lists the Modeled Available Groundwater (MAG) for the Hickory Aquifer across all of Burnet County at 3,415 acre-feet per year. That number is identical for every decade from 2020 all the way through 2080. It does not move.

Asphalt Inc.'s application requests 242 acre-feet per year. That's roughly 7% of the entire district-wide sustainable yield of the Hickory Aquifer — committed to a single industrial operation, out of a resource the District's own plan states it must manage to protect all groundwater users and the county's broader economic vitality, not one applicant.

We believe this raises a fair, public question: is committing that share of a fixed, county-wide resource to one quarry consistent with the District's own approved plan?

A 30-Year Model That Ignores Growth
Here's something else buried in the applicant's own paperwork: their 30-year drawdown projections explicitly assume aquifer conditions stay constant. In their own words, the model does not account for population growth, future development, drought, or the many other factors that will shape our aquifer over the next three decades.

Anyone who has driven through Burnet County lately knows we are not standing still. Treating 30 years of growth as zero isn't a conservative assumption — it's a blind spot, and it's the applicant's own admission, not our interpretation.

What you can do

Share this update with neighbors within five miles of FM 3509 — if your well isn't permitted, this law was written with you in mind.

Attend the SaveBurnet.com public meeting on September 15th.

Stay involved and up to date by signing up for the weekly SaveBurnet.com updates.

Reach out to your state representative and senator and ask them to confirm CTGCD is implementing HB 1633 as intended.


Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our, youth camps, state parks, wells, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Click here to Sign up for Weekly Updates

Click here to Submit a comment to your legislators

Click here to read HB 1633

update 109 - Join Us Sept. 15 & a Reply to TACA

8/21/26

Save the Date: Public Meeting, Tuesday, September 15

Dear Followers,
SaveBurnet.com is hosting a free, public community meeting on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, from 6:00–7:30 p.m. (doors open at 5:30 p.m.) at the AgriLife Extension Center, 607 N. Vandeveer St., Burnet, TX. Everyone is welcome — bring your neighbors.

Our featured speaker is Andrea Sparks, J.D., Director of Government and Strategic Relations for Buckner International and former Founding Director of the Texas Governor's Child Sex Trafficking Team. With more than two decades of experience inside the Texas Legislature and state government, Andrea will answer the question we hear most from residents doing grassroots outreach: "Are our letters, emails, and phone calls to state lawmakers actually making a difference?" She'll give us an insider's look at how legislative offices track constituent contact, how volume creates real leverage, and how sustained grassroots pressure moves protective legislation forward at the Capitol.

This is directly relevant to everything below. TACA's op-ed didn't appear in a vacuum — it appeared ahead of the legislative session where bills like this get decided. Andrea's talk is about how we make sure our side is heard just as loudly.

- “Lucky” Is Not the Word We’d Use

"A response to the Texas Aggregates & Concrete Association’s August 19 op-ed in the Burnet Bulletin"

On Wednesday, August 19, 2026, readers of the Burnet Bulletin opened the Commentary page to a piece titled “Texas built locally down to materials beneath our feet,” written by Andrew S. Pinkerton — President and CEO of the Texas Aggregates & Concrete Association (TACA), the aggregate industry’s own trade and lobbying group. His argument, in short: Texas is growing fast, growth requires concrete and crushed stone, and those materials are heavy and expensive to move — so we should feel fortunate to have quarries nearby.

That might work as a statewide argument, but it's not what Burnet County residents are actually seeing and breathing.

What “lucky” looks like from here

Mr. Pinkerton's op-ed doesn't mention what's actually next door to a Hill Country quarry: a state park that runs guided cave tours for school groups and families nearly every day of the year; private wells drawing from the Hickory Aquifer; Spring Creek and the stock tanks ranchers depend on; and homes close enough to feel blasting in their foundations. TPWD's own project files acknowledge the “startle” factor of blasting on visitors deep inside a dark cavern, and the risk of fine dust and blasting gases migrating into the cave through karst fissures — real, documented concerns, not hypotheticals.

On January 13, 2026, the Burnet County Commissioners Court passed a unanimous, bipartisan resolution opposing new groundwater permits for high-volume industrial users — specifically naming the proposed FM 3509 rock crusher — until a thorough, independent study is done. That's the community's own elected officials, not outside activists, saying the risk hasn't been shown to be safe.

“Following the rules” shouldn't mean self-grading
TACA's op-ed treats permit compliance as a given. But look at how compliance is actually verified under the current structure: Best Management Practices for silt, runoff, and stormwater are, in large part, self-monitored and self-reported by the operator. Our own questions to LCRA about who independently checks rock-berm inspections, sediment depth, or BMP adherence at the proposed site have not been answered with a clear “we verify this.” [ADD: specific TCEQ complaint/violation records, photos, and dates for existing area quarries once documentation is in hand — this section should name the facility and cite the notice of violation or inspection report directly.]

“Local materials for local use” — or a rail line to somewhere else?
Here's the part of the op-ed that doesn't square with what's happening in our own backyard. Mr. Pinkerton leans on a 2025 Phoenix Center study to argue that 90 percent of aggregate is consumed within 50 miles of where it's dug up, because trucking it farther roughly doubles the cost. By that same logic, ask why Texas Materials Group (a CRH Americas subsidiary operating quarries in the Burnet area) proposed building the 27-mile “Broken Stone Railroad” in 2025 — a line designed specifically to connect four Burnet-area quarries to the BNSF national freight network near Lampasas.

A company doesn't build 27 miles of new and rebuilt track to serve customers 50 miles down the road — trucks already do that job. Rail only makes sense when the destination is much farther away, or when it connects to a national network that reaches well beyond Central Texas. Reporting on the proposal describes it as serving “construction markets” and Austin-area growth; it is not yet confirmed, and we have not been able to independently verify, what share of material moving on that line would leave Texas altogether. That project has been paused (not withdrawn) since May 2025 following strong opposition from Burnet and Lampasas residents, both city councils, and county commissioners in both counties.

The honest version of this point: whether or not the material crosses a state line, the industry's own rail proposal is proof that a meaningful share of Burnet County's quarried rock is not staying local at all — it's being positioned to reach distant, national markets. That undercuts the “we mine it here so you can build it here” narrative a lot more precisely than a broader claim we can't yet document. [ADD: if we obtain STB filing data, waybill records, or a company statement on actual destination markets/percentages, cite them directly here — that would let us make the out-of-state claim with a hard number instead of an inference.]

Why this op-ed, why now?
It's worth asking why a statewide trade association's president spends his time writing commentary for a paper the size of the Burnet Bulletin. Here's the context Mr. Pinkerton's op-ed leaves out: during the 2025 legislative session, state lawmakers filed a wide slate of bills to tighten oversight of quarries and concrete plants statewide — larger setbacks from hospitals and schools (HB 1823), mandatory reclamation and financial assurance (HB 873), cumulative air-quality review within three miles of new permits (SB 273), six-year TCEQ re-review of concrete plant permits (SB 763), and expanded public-hearing rights (HB 1726). Locally, Rep. Ellen Troxclair filed HB 3482, written specifically in response to the proposed Asphalt Inc. quarry near Longhorn Cavern, Inks Lake State Park, and Camp Longhorn.

Not one of those bills became law. HB 3482 was left pending in the House Natural Resources Committee after testimony revealed that no single state agency is actually responsible for evaluating a quarry's combined impact on air, water, noise, and nearby sensitive sites — TCEQ doesn't monitor in real time here, and LCRA testified plainly, "we don't do air, we don't do noise." The broader reform package died too. Texas lawmakers reconvene for the next regular session in January 2027.

TACA is a trade association funded by aggregate and concrete companies, and it runs its own political action committee, TACPAC, that contributes to legislative campaigns. Building public support before a bill is even filed is a normal, legal part of how a trade group defends its industry — that's simply what the job is. But "normal" doesn't mean "in Burnet County's interest." Recognizing that this op-ed arrived seven months before lawmakers reconvene, and one legislative cycle after the local bill written for our county died in committee, is not a conspiracy theory — it's just reading the calendar.

If "closer is cheaper" is the whole argument, where does it end?
Mr. Pinkerton's entire case rests on one idea: hauling heavy materials a long way costs money, so it makes economic sense to put the source close to where it's used. Taken on its own, that's true — and it's also an argument for putting a landfill, a waste-transfer station, or a sewage treatment plant right next to every subdivision it serves. By that logic, those neighborhoods should feel "lucky" too: shorter hauls, lower costs, less truck traffic on the highway.

We don't build it that way, and everyone understands why: some facilities carry health, safety, and quality-of-life costs to the people living nearest them that outweigh the transportation savings, so we keep distance between those facilities and homes, schools, and children — even when it costs more. A rock crusher generating fine particulate dust and blast overpressure next to a state park that runs cave tours for school groups deserves to be held to exactly that same standard, not a cost-savings argument built for a different kind of debate.

The bottom line
Texas needs aggregate. Nobody disputes that. What's in dispute is whether it's reasonable to put a rock crusher, blasting, and heavy truck and rail traffic within earshot of a state park, a network of caves, family wells, and homes — and then call the neighbors “lucky.” Growth doesn't require pretending the tradeoffs don't exist.

What you can do

Share this update with neighbors and encourage them to subscribe at SaveBurnet.com.

Keep sending us photos and documentation of dust, truck traffic, or visible permit issues at existing quarries — dated and located. It's the single most persuasive thing we can put in front of TCEQ, TPWD, and our legislators.

Attend the SaveBurnet.com meeting on September 15th! Mark your calendars now.


Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our, youth camps, state parks, wells, and the Texas Hill Country we love.

The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Click here to get the real info about TACA

update 108 - A SENATOR WHO LISTENS: fLORES PRESSES TCEQ FOR REAL ANSWERS

This graphic captures the exact exchange at the heart of this update: at the August 11th Senate Natural Resources Committee hearing, Senator Pete Flores asked TCEQ Executive Director Kelly Keel a direct, common-sense question — whether continuous air monitoring, the practice EPA recommends, is required for facilities like the proposed Burnet quarry. Her answer, on the record: she wasn't sure, and couldn't point to a citation or clear standard. That side-by-side is the whole point of this update — a sitting senator representing both Burnet and Llano Counties put TCEQ on the spot, and the agency still couldn't say whether our air is being watched to the standard it should be. You can watch the full exchange at SaveBurnet.com.

8/17/26

Update #108 - A Senator Who Listens: Flores Presses TCEQ for Real Answers

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

This Isn't Just a Burnet County Issue

Over the past few weeks, SaveBurnet.com has heard from a growing number of followers who live in Llano County, asking us to make sure Llano is part of this conversation too — and they're right to raise it. This has never been a Burnet-only fight. The proposed quarry off FM 3509 sits close enough to the county line that its dust, blasting, truck traffic, and water impacts will reach many Llano County residents as well. Senate District 24, which Senator Pete Flores represents, covers both Burnet and Llano Counties — and so does this fight. From here forward, you'll see us speak to both communities, because both communities are affected.

Mark Your Calendar: Public Meeting, September 15th

Save the date. SaveBurnet.com will hold a public meeting to look back at what this community has accomplished so far and look ahead at what's next. We'll also welcome a guest speaker who will walk us through how the legislative process actually works, so every one of you knows exactly how to make your voice count in Austin.

WHEN: Tuesday, September 15th, 2026
TIME: 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM
WHERE: Burnet County AgriLife Extension Office
ADDRESS: 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611
More details will be posted soon at SaveBurnet.com — watch this space

Your Senator Is Working for You
We also want to make sure every resident of Burnet County and Llano County knows something important: Senator Pete Flores is doing his job, and he's doing it well.

Senate District 24 — which covers both Burnet and Llano Counties, along with Bandera, Bell, Coryell, Gillespie, Kerr, Kimble, Lampasas, Medina, and Sutton — is fortunate to have a senator who is willing to ask the hard questions our state agencies too often avoid.

At the August 11th Senate Natural Resources Committee hearing, Senator Flores did exactly that. He directly asked a TCEQ representative whether continuous air monitoring — the practice EPA recommends — is required for facilities like the proposed Burnet quarry. TCEQ's answer? They weren't sure. No citation, no data, no clear standard — just a non-answer, on the record, in front of the committee. Senator Flores also raised the nearby youth camp as part of the public-health picture, making sure the human stakes of this issue weren't lost in the back-and-forth of permitting technicalities.

That moment matters. It's one thing for SaveBurnet.com to raise these concerns — it's another for a sitting state senator to put TCEQ on the spot in a public hearing and come away without a straight answer. That exchange is now part of the public record, and it's exactly the kind of accountability our community needs more of.

You can hear it for yourself. We've posted the audio/video of Senator Flores's exchange with TCEQ at the August 11th hearing on SaveBurnet.com — Click here to access the Natural Resources Committee hearing.

Since that hearing, we've also followed up with Senator Flores's office, asking him to press TCEQ's Executive Director on three specific points before any extension is granted on the pending Asphalt Inc. permit: a real best-available-control-technology review, evaluation against the current (and far stricter) federal PM2.5 health standard, and a hard look at whether one more generic permit makes sense given how many rock-crushing operations are already clustered in this part of Burnet County. We'll keep you posted as that follows through.

What You Can Do
Senator Flores stood up for Burnet and Llano County residents in that hearing room. Now it's our turn to show him it mattered:

Send Senator Flores a thank-you note for asking the questions TCEQ couldn't — or wouldn't — answer.

Ask him to keep pushing. Let him know that Burnet County and Llano County do not need more Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) or rock quarries causing environmental harm to our air, our water, and our communities.

Need help finding the words? Sample letters for both are available on SaveBurnet.com at saveburnet.com/write-to-your-legislators.html.

State Senator Pete Flores (Senate District 24 – Burnet & Llano)
Phone: (512) 463-0124
Mail: P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station, Austin, TX 78711
Email: use the "e-mail the Office of Senator Pete Flores" link on his official Senate page

Every call, email, and note tells our elected officials that Burnet and Llano County are watching — and that we notice when they stand up for us.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.
The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Submit a comment to your Legislators
See pictures and video of local quarry dust

update 107 - The Invisible Threat & TCEQ’s Fantasy at the Fence Line

Old vs. New: Why TCEQ’s Visual Testing Fails Burnet County. As shown above, TCEQ’s reliance on short, visual opacity tests (EPA Methods 9 & 22) is fundamentally flawed—human eyes simply cannot see the microscopic (PM2.5) particles that travel miles on Central Texas winds and penetrate deep into our lungs. Modern air safety requires switching to continuous, 24/7 fence-line electronic monitoring. Continuous monitors provide objective, real-time alerts whenever dangerous dust crosses a property line, ensuring our schools, water sources, and neighborhoods are genuinely protected around the clock.

8/7/26

Update #107 -
The Invisible Threat & TCEQ’s Fantasy at the Fence Line

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

Texas is definitely open for business. Multibillion-dollar companies are lining up to build in the Hill Country, and once you see how the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) actually operates, it’s easy to understand why. At this point, we think the agency’s initials should stand for something a little more honest: Texas Certification for Every Quarry.
If you have stepped outside anywhere near Marble Falls or across Burnet County, you don’t need an engineering degree or a state bureaucrat to tell you what is happening. You can see it with your own eyes: massive, thick dust clouds rising from rock crushers and quarry operations, traveling for miles across our neighborhoods, pastures, state parks, and youth camps.
Yet, if you ask the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), they’ll tell you everything is working as planned.

1. Computer Models vs. Real-Life Dust Clouds
In regulatory discussions, TCEQ staff—including representatives like Sam Short—have pointed to atmospheric air dispersion modeling to claim that facility designs and dust management protocols ensure dust does not cross property boundaries.
According to TCEQ's theoretical screening models, fugitive dust magically stops at the fence line.
Anyone living in Burnet County knows how detached this is from physical reality. A computer program running on an outdated set of assumptions cannot stop high Central Texas winds from carrying toxic fine particulate matter (PM2.5) into our lungs, homes, and water sources.

2. Antiquated Measurement Methods
Why is TCEQ unable (or unwilling) to catch these clear violations? Because their monitoring methods belong in the past century:
• Visual Opacity & Human Eyes (EPA Methods 9 & 22): Instead of installing continuous, 24/7 electronic monitors at quarry boundaries, TCEQ relies on short, 6- to 15-minute visual observations. A certified human observer literally stands at a property line and looks at the sky to estimate "opacity" or count seconds of visible dust. In practice, this method is worthless: it cannot detect the microscopic PM2.5 dust that actually threatens our health, and it only has to hold up for a few cherry-picked minutes — not the 12 to 24 hours a day these quarries actually run.

• The PM2.5 Blind Spot: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is microscopic—roughly 1/30th the width of a human hair. PM2.5 penetrates deep into lung tissue and enters the bloodstream. You cannot measure PM2.5 with the human eye; an air mass can be filled with hazardous fine particles while maintaining 0% visual opacity.

• No Real-Time Monitoring: Other states enforce continuous, automated particulate monitors at industrial boundaries. TCEQ continues to use periodic visual inspections and paper-based permit representations.

3. The 35-Year Enforcement Backlog
As highlighted in recent evaluations of TCEQ’s enforcement data, the agency’s backlog of unresolved enforcement cases remains staggering.
• At TCEQ’s current pace of case resolution—and assuming zero new violations are filed—it would take the agency 35 years just to clear its existing enforcement backlog.
• Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of Texans suffer the daily consequences of unmonitored aggregate extraction and rock crushing.
This level of regulatory failure is completely unacceptable.

4. Call to Action: Demand Legislative Protection
We cannot wait 35 years for TCEQ to clean up its act. We need our state leadership to enact statutory changes that force real-time air monitoring, buffer zones, and strict enforcement on aggregate operations.
Please take 5 minutes today to call or email our state leaders. Tell them that Burnet County residents demand real air quality protection, continuous fence-line PM2.5 monitors, and an immediate fix to TCEQ’s broken permitting process.

Key Contacts:
• Governor Greg Abbott
o Phone: (512) 463-2000 / (800) 843-5789
o Online Contact: gov.texas.gov/contact
   o Email: [email protected]

• Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick
o Phone: (512) 463-0001
o Email: [email protected]

• Representative Dustin Burrows
o Phone: (512) 463-0542
   o Email: [email protected]

• State Representative Ellen Troxclair (House District 19 - Burnet)
o Phone: (512) 463-0090
o Email: [email protected]

• State Senator Pete Flores (Senate District 24 - Burnet)
o Phone: (512) 463-0124
o Email: [email protected]

What to Say / Write:
"I am a resident of Burnet County writing to demand immediate legislative reform regarding uncontrolled rock crushers and quarries near our homes, youth camps, schools, and state parks. TCEQ's outdated visual dust tests and theoretical modeling fail to protect public health. We demand mandatory, continuous 24/7 PM2.5 air monitors at quarry property lines, consistent with EPA guidance and the practices already required in other states, along with stricter operational buffers and immediate clearing of TCEQ's enforcement backlog. The Air Extension Permit 176835 for the Burnet Quarry should not be issued until it includes a provision for a continuous, 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week air monitoring system that is installed and operating at the site. Protect Texas families and our Hill Country communities!"

See the dust for yourself: we’ve posted new photos and video of the quarries between Burnet and Marble Falls on SaveBurnet.com. Scroll to the bottom of the page to view them at saveburnet.com/environmental-info.

Keep sharing your photos and video evidence with SaveBurnet.com.
Together, we will make our voices heard.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.
The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
Submit a comment to your Legislators
See pictures and video of local quarry dust

update 106 - A Warning From Oregon — And a Question We Must Ask Before CTGCD Issues Asphalt Inc.'s Permit

Get the Science Right Before the Permit is Signed. This infographic highlights the urgent cautionary tale out of Oregon—where unmonitored aggregate mining led to widespread well contamination—and contrasts it with our current opportunity in Burnet County. We are calling on the CTGCD to pause action on Asphalt Inc.’s permit until a full, independent study of our aquifer's cumulative health is complete. Share this image with friends & neighbors to help us protect our water, our land, and our Hill Country legacy

7/31/26

Update #106 -
A Warning From Oregon — And a Question We Must Ask Before CTGCD Issues Asphalt Inc.'s Permit

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

Right now, 1,900 miles away, families in Prineville, Oregon are living through what happens when an aggregate company pumps and processes near a community's only water source — and nobody stopped to ask "what will this do to our aquifer?" before the damage was done.

Three families have filed $78 million in lawsuits against Knife River Corporation, alleging that the company's sand and gravel mine has contaminated the groundwater their homes, and their livestock, depend on entirely. The lawsuits describe stillborn cows, dead dogs, and full-body rashes among residents whose well water ran clean for generations — until Knife River ramped up production nearby.

"Water that was clean for a hundred years does not fail by coincidence in a single year," the residents' attorney said.

Oregon's own state health authority stepped in. A health consultation found that water from nearly 60 domestic wells near the mine posed a real health risk from contaminants including arsenic, nitrates, and coliform bacteria. County officials are now weighing whether to revoke the mine's permit entirely — after the damage was already done.

Does the name Knife River sound familiar? It should.

Knife River operates the Honey Creek Quarry, a 570-acre rock-crushing facility right here on Highway 281 in Burnet County — recently expanded with a third crusher, extended operating hours, and its own rail line. We are not suggesting Honey Creek is causing harm today. We are pointing out something simple and important: the very same company now facing a groundwater contamination lawsuit in Oregon operates one of the larger aggregate facilities in our own county. That should be enough to make every resident, every county official, and every regulator pause.

Why This Matters Right Now — Not Someday
Burnet County already has more aggregate operations along the Highway 281 corridor than most Texans realize — Honey Creek, Oldcastle/Texas Materials, Hanson Aggregates, Collier Materials, and others all draw from the same limited water resources in this stretch between Burnet and Marble Falls. We're not asking to shut any of them down. What we are asking is straightforward:

Before the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District grants Asphalt Inc., LLC an industrial-scale groundwater permit — pumping at volumes far beyond household or general business use — a full, independent study of the cumulative impact on our aquifer must be completed first.

This is not a request for special treatment. It's a request for due diligence. The Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District has raised several additional questions on the permit application and needs additional time to continue due diligence before any decision is made. When a permit application still has open questions, the responsible path isn't to approve it and hope for the best. It's to require the full study first.

Oregon didn't get that chance. We still do.

What You Can Do:

Ask CTGCD to pause action on Asphalt Inc.'s groundwater permit application until an independent, comprehensive hydrogeologic and cumulative-impact study is completed — not one funded and authored solely by the applicant.

Contact your state legislators and ask them to support oversight of industrial groundwater permitting before it's granted, not after wells start running dry or turning up contaminated.

Share this email with your neighbors. The more of us asking the same question, the harder it is to ignore.

Stay engaged. Data, documentation, and persistence remain our strongest tools in protecting our wells and the Texas Hill Country we all love.

This county has never been against growth, against industry, or against our neighbors who work in this business. What we are for is simple: get the science right before the permit is signed, not after the wells run dry. That is not too much to ask, and it never has been.

Burnet County has weathered a lot together these past two years — hearings, studies, setbacks, and small victories. Through all of it, this community has shown up for each other, for our land, and for the families who will call this place home long after this fight is over. That's worth holding onto. Together, we can make sure the decision on this permit is made the right way — with full information, full transparency, and full respect for the water this county cannot live without.

Respectfully,
The SaveBurnet.com team

SaveBurnet.com | Burnet County, Texas
Submit a comment to your Legislators
Submit a comment to CTGCD
Read the full Knife River article

Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 105b - Don't Be Discouraged: The Rule Is Actually on Our Side

We want to be upfront with you: that response is accurate. We don't want anyone to feel like their letter didn't matter, or that we misled you — it didn't, and we didn't. TCEQ is correct that this specific action, an 18-month construction extension under 30 TAC §116.120(b), isn't subject to a formal public comment period. But that response only told half the story, and the other half matters a great deal.

THE PART THAT WASN'T MENTIONED

The very same rule TCEQ cited — 30 TAC §116.120(b) — also states that permits granted an extension are subject to revision based on Best Available Control Technology (BACT). In other words: TCEQ doesn't have to open this for public comment, but the rule itself contemplates that the permit's pollution controls get revisited and updated at exactly this stage — extension time is BACT review time, built directly into the regulation.

That is not a small detail. That is exactly what we've been asking for. Our request has always been simple: require enclosed dry baghouse dust collection instead of outdated wet spray, and make sure the permit reflects the EPA's updated PM2.5 air quality standards. This isn't just something we think is fair. It's exactly what the rule says should happen at this step in the process.

So please, don't be discouraged. Keep the letters coming — just use the updated version below.
  E REVISED LETTER — PLEASE USE THIS VERSION GOING FORWARD
We've updated the sample letter on SaveBurnet.com to speak directly to what TCEQ told us, rather than asking for something they've already said isn't on the table. If you already sent the original letter from Update #105, please send this follow-up too.

Subject line: Request for BACT Revision Review — Permit #176835 / Project #412300 (Asphalt Inc., LLC)

Send to: [email protected] | [email protected] | [email protected] | [email protected]

I understand TCEQ's position that this ESOC1 extension request is not subject to public comment. I'm writing regarding a related provision in the same rule governing this extension. Under 30 TAC §116.120(b), permits that receive an extension are subject to revision based on current Best Available Control Technology. I respectfully ask TCEQ to apply that BACT revision to Permit #176835/Project #412300 (Asphalt Inc., LLC, Burnet Crushing Plant, 3221 FM 3509, Burnet County) — specifically requiring enclosed dry baghouse dust collection in place of wet spray suppression, and confirming the permit reflects the EPA's updated PM2.5 standards. This technology is proven and already in successful use at a comparable facility in Hays County. Burnet County's groundwater and air quality should not be extended forward under outdated permit terms when the rule itself contemplates a BACT update at this stage.

Respectfully,
[Add your Name, and Address]


WHAT YOU CAN DO

Send the revised letter above, even if you already sent the original one from Update #105.

Share this update with anyone who told you TCEQ "already said no." TCEQ said no to a comment period — not to a BACT review, because the rule says that review happens here.

Stay persistent. Regulatory pushback at this stage is normal. It doesn't mean the fight is over. It means we adjust and keep going.

This is exactly the kind of moment this campaign has faced before — an agency response that sounds final but isn't. We read the rule. We found the opening. And we're not backing down from it.


Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

READ UPDATE #102 — THE FULL DRY PLANT ANALYSIS
TECHNICAL COST ANALYSIS - Wet Spray System vs. Dry Baghouse System & What is Rock Flour
TCEQ - Contact info & Revised Sample Letter and 30 TAC §116.120(b)

update 105 - Tell TCEQ: No Extension Without Real Dust Control

Don't Rubber-Stamp the Past — Require What's Best for Burnet County
The graphic above breaks down why an extension without upgraded standards is unacceptable. Enclosed dry baghouse technology is proven, affordable, and drastically reduces environmental risks by conserving up to 80% of groundwater compared to wet suppression. Tell TCEQ: No extension for Permit #176835 unless Asphalt Inc. updates its equipment to meet current Best Available Control Technology (BACT)

7/22/26

Time to Speak Up — Tell TCEQ to Deny Asphalt Inc.'s Permit Extension

Dear Friends of Save Burnet,
  need you again — and this time, the window to act is short.
Asphalt Inc., LLC (d/b/a Lone Star Paving) did not start construction on its Burnet Crushing Plant at 3221 FM 3509 within the timeframe required by its original state air permit. Under Texas law, when a company misses that window, it must request an extension — and TCEQ is required to take a fresh look at whether the pollution controls in that permit still meet today's standards before granting one.

That review is happening right now, under Permit #176835 / Project #412300. This is our chance to tell TCEQ: don't just rubber-stamp more time. Require better.

WHY THIS MATTERS
When TCEQ reviews an extension request like this one, Texas regulation (30 TAC § 116.120(b)) requires the agency to re-evaluate the permit against current Best Available Control Technology (BACT) — not whatever was considered acceptable years ago when the original permit was drafted. Since then, two things have changed:

1. The EPA has tightened national air quality standards for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) — the same fine rock dust a crushing plant generates. Any extension review must confirm the plant's controls still meet the tougher standard.

2. The industry itself has moved on. For years, quarries relied on "wet suppression" — spraying enormous volumes of pumped groundwater onto rock crushers, haul roads, and stockpiles to keep dust down. That made sense when water was assumed to be free and unlimited. In a county fighting to protect the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer, it no longer does.

Enclosed dry baghouse and vacuum filtration systems — which capture over 99% of fine particulate dust without consuming groundwater at all — have moved from "experimental" to standard, proven technology at aggregate operations elsewhere in Texas.

As we laid out in detail in Update #102, a dry plant system for an operation this size is a $1.1 million capital investment that pays for itself in under two years — generating approximately $585,000 annually in combined operating savings and marketable rock flour revenue, while saving over 75 million gallons of groundwater every year. A quarry in Hays County, KBDJ Conservation Land & Quarry, already proved this works in the same Hill Country limestone geology, cutting water use by at least 80% while staying profitable. This is not an unproven ask, and it is not a financial hardship for a company the size of Construction Partners Inc. It has already been done, successfully, in this state.

Read the full math behind these numbers in Update #102, including the complete sourced technical analysis: https://www.saveburnet.com/environmental-info.html

There is no legitimate excuse left for Asphalt Inc. to be granted more time under outdated, water-intensive standards.

WHAT YOU CAN DO — RIGHT NOW
TCEQ accepts public comment directly. Please take five minutes to email the following three addresses. Copying all three ensures your comment reaches the reviewing engineer, the office representing the public interest, and the formal case record:

[email protected] — Attn: Sarah Castillo,
Review Engineer, Project #412300
[email protected] — Office of Public Interest Counsel
[email protected] — Office of the Chief Clerk

Subject line: Public Comment — Permit #176835 / Project #412300 (Asphalt Inc., LLC)

Sample message — copy, paste, and personalize if you can:

I oppose granting an extension for Permit #176835 (Project #412300, Asphalt Inc., LLC, Burnet Crushing Plant, 3221 FM 3509, Burnet County). Under 30 TAC § 116.120(b), TCEQ must require current Best Available Control Technology — including enclosed dry baghouse dust collection — and must evaluate the permit against updated PM2.5 air quality standards before granting any extension. This technology is proven, affordable, and already in use at other Texas aggregate facilities, including one in Hays County with the same limestone Hill Country geology as Burnet County. Burnet County's groundwater and air quality should not be sacrificed to outdated permit terms. I respectfully ask TCEQ to deny the extension unless Asphalt Inc. updates its application to meet modern BACT standards.

A few words in your own voice — where you live, whether you're on a well, why this matters to your family — carries real weight in the public record.

EVERY VOICE COUNTS
This isn't a technical footnote — it's a real opportunity to hold a permit to the standard it should already meet. TCEQ's own rules give us this opening. Let's use it, together.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

READ UPDATE #102 — THE FULL DRY PLANT ANALYSIS
TECHNICAL COST ANALYSIS - Wet Spray System vs. Dry Baghouse System & What is Rock Flour
TCEQ - Contact info and Sample Letter

update 104 - Camp Safety, the Rock Quarry, and What We're Learning from East Texas

The image above captures the two stories driving this week's update. On one side are generations of children enjoying the Texas Hill Country at Camp Buckner and Camp Longhorn—places whose leaders have now publicly voiced concerns about a proposed 700-acre quarry next door. On the other is the broader warning coming from East Texas, where a battle over groundwater rights demonstrates how vulnerable local communities can be when industrial development outpaces state protections. Together, these stories point to the same conclusion: protecting our children, our water, and our Hill Country requires stronger laws before—not after—the damage is done.

7/17/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
Two stories converged this month, and together they make our case better than either one does alone. A local TV crew sat down with the leaders of Camp Buckner and Camp Longhorn to talk about what the proposed FM 3509 rock crusher could mean for the campers they've served for generations. And a Texas Tribune investigation out of East Texas shows exactly what happens when an outside investor tries to override a groundwater district's authority to protect a shared aquifer — a preview of what we could be facing here.

The Camps Speak Out
Watch the KVUE interview with leaders from Camp Buckner and Camp Longhorn, or read the full KVUE report here.

In the piece, leaders from both camps went on record with their concerns about the proposed 700-acre quarry off Hoover Valley Road, which sits along the property line of Camp Longhorn Indian Springs and just a few miles from Camp Buckner. Camp Longhorn's director described it as a genuine threat to the health and safety of the children who spend their summers there, and Camp Buckner's Andrea Sparks echoed the concern about a project of this scale sitting this close to camp property.

The report also confirmed where the permitting stands: Asphalt Inc. has already secured its permits from the LCRA and TCEQ. The one permit still outstanding is the groundwater permit from CTGCD, which the district is currently reviewing for administrative completeness. In a statement to KVUE, Asphalt Inc., doing business as Lone Star Paving, said it remains committed to operating responsibly and using industry best practices — the same assurance we've heard throughout this process. Camp leaders made clear they intend to keep opposing the project regardless.

This is the clearest statement yet, on camera, from two respected youth-camp institutions that this isn't a fringe concern. It's exactly the kind of testimony our companion bill package — including the sensitive-site blasting protections — is designed to back up with the force of state law.

The East Texas Fight
The second story comes from the Texas Tribune: Battle over East Texas water rights heats up after Dallas millionaire files federal lawsuit to lift moratorium (July 8, 2026).

A Dallas-based private equity investor has filed a federal lawsuit against the Neches & Trinity Valleys Groundwater Conservation District, seeking to overturn a moratorium that has blocked his companies from drilling 43 high-capacity wells designed to pull billions of gallons from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer. The lawsuit argues that the district's regulation amounts to an unconstitutional taking of the investor's property rights.

Here's the part that should sound familiar: the moratorium didn't come out of nowhere. It followed a lawsuit from a local employer, a poultry processor that depends on the same aquifer for its plants, arguing the wells would drain the water supply their business and their community rely on. A judge sided with them and ordered the aquifer studied before any more permits could move forward. Only after that did the district impose its own moratorium — and now that moratorium itself is under legal attack.

Zoom out further, and there's an even more important detail: during the last legislative session, state lawmakers tried and failed to pass a statewide requirement that Texas study its aquifers before approving large-scale extraction projects. That effort didn't succeed. It's still unfinished business at the Capitol.

Why This Matters for Burnet County
Replace “Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer” with “Hickory Sandstone Aquifer,” replace “43 high-capacity wells” with a proposed industrial quarry, and the shape of the story is the same one we've been telling for months: an outside, investor-backed operation seeking to pump large volumes of water from a shared aquifer, over the objections of the community that depends on it, while local regulators try to hold the line using tools the Legislature hasn't fully given them.

And the camp interviews put a human face on exactly what's at stake if that line doesn't hold: two youth camps that have operated safely in this same landscape for generations, now telling a statewide TV audience that they're worried about the water their campers swim in and the blasting that could happen next door.

The East Texas case shows both the risk and the opportunity in front of us:

The risk — a groundwater conservation district's authority to protect a community's water supply can be challenged in federal court by a well-funded investor, even after a judge has already ordered an aquifer study. If CTGCD moves to restrict or deny the FM 3509 permit, we should expect nothing less from Asphalt Inc.'s parent company.

The opportunity — this is fresh, documented proof that the Legislature's attempt to require aquifer study before large permits was the right idea, and that leaving it undone has real consequences for real communities. That is exactly the gap our companion bill package is built to close.

What You Can Do Right Now
CLICK HERE to share the KVUE report and interview with friends and family — the more people who see camp leaders speaking up, the harder this is for officials to ignore.
CLICK HERE to review the Legislative Advocacy Directory and send a note to your representatives referencing this East Texas case directly. The ask is simple: Texas already tried to require aquifer study before granting large-scale water permits. It's time to finish that job — for East Texas, and for Burnet County.
CLICK HERE to revisit our five sample letters to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and Speaker Burrows, and consider adding a line referencing this case as evidence the problem is statewide, not local.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 103 - What a 1998 Paper Mill Rule Can Teach Texas About Rock Quarries Today

Texas has already solved this exact problem once before. Long before Asphalt Inc. and CPI ever looked at FM 3509, East Texas built entire towns around paper mills that ran on the same self-regulated, "this is just how the industry works" playbook rock quarries and APOs use today — and left behind a decades-long environmental bill the communities never agreed to pay. What changed everything wasn't a shutdown. It was requiring the best available technology already on the shelf. Hazardous air pollutants fell 59%. Sulfur emissions fell 47%. Dioxin contamination near pulp mills was virtually eliminated. The mills kept running, the jobs stayed, and the communities finally stopped absorbing the cost. That is the same fix we are asking our legislators to require today for Burnet County — a solution that is achievable, and already proven to work.

7/10/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
So this week, instead of another data breakdown, we want to tell you a story — a true one, from our own backyard — that we believe is the single most persuasive argument we can bring into those rooms. Because Texas has actually solved a problem almost exactly like this one before.

A Story From Our Own Backyard: The Piney Woods Paper Mills
Long before Asphalt Inc. and Construction Partners Inc. set their sights on FM 3509, East Texas built an entire regional economy around a different heavy industry: pulp and paper. Thomas L.L. Temple founded Southern Pine Lumber Company in Diboll in 1893, which grew into Temple Lumber, then Temple-Eastex, then Temple-Inland — running major pulp and kraft paper operations at Evadale and building materials plants across deep East Texas. In Lufkin, Southland Paper Mills opened in 1940 and became one of the great economic engines of Angelina County for nearly 70 years. These mills were not villains. They were, for generations, the lifeblood of their towns — exactly the kind of “essential industry” argument that CPI and Asphalt Inc. want you to accept today about rock quarries.

The Same Playbook We're Fighting Today
Here is where the story turns familiar. The kraft pulping process that made these mills profitable also produced serious pollution: the notorious “rotten egg” smell of hydrogen sulfide in the air, and heavy chemical discharge into rivers and bayous — including dioxin, one of the most persistent carcinogens known to science. For decades, almost none of this was meaningfully regulated. Mills operated on the same kind of self-certified, honor-system compliance we exposed in Update #97 about today's quarry stormwater plans.

The worst-case outcome of that unregulated era is still an open wound in Texas today. In the 1960s, paper mill waste was barged down the Houston Ship Channel and buried near the San Jacinto River. It was forgotten for decades — until it was rediscovered, marked off today with orange buoys as the San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site. International Paper is still paying cleanup costs on that site more than sixty years later. A pollution decision that looked small and temporary in the 1960s became a multi-generational, multimillion-dollar burden that the surrounding community never agreed to and could not undo.

This is exactly the warning we have been raising about the retention pond overflow on July 4, 2025, and about “rock flour slurry” flowing toward Peters Creek, the Inks Dam Fish Hatchery, and the City of Burnet's drinking water intake at Devil's Backbone Cove. The bill for pollution is never paid by the company in the moment. It is paid by the community, for generations.

Then Washington Stepped In — And the Industry Didn't Die
Here is the part of the story that matters most for our fight: Texas and the nation did not solve this by shutting the paper industry down. They solved it by requiring better technology — and the industry adapted, survived, and is still profitable today.

Starting with the 1972 Clean Water Act, EPA issued a series of pulp and paper pollution rules in 1974, 1977, 1982, and 1986. Then in 1998, EPA finalized what the industry still calls the “Cluster Rule” — a combined air-and-water standard requiring mills to use the best available technology: chlorine-free bleaching methods, real secondary wastewater treatment, and documented best management practices for spill prevention.

The results, according to EPA's own data, were dramatic:

Hazardous air pollutants from the industry dropped by nearly 60%
Sulfur emissions dropped by about 47%
Volatile organic compound emissions dropped by about 49%
Particulate matter emissions dropped by about 37%
Dioxin contamination in waterways near pulp mills was virtually eliminated — falling to just a handful of monitored sites nationwide, from what had been a widespread contamination proble

And the industry did not collapse. Pulp and paper companies operate today at healthy profit margins, and many mills now treat water reuse, energy efficiency, and byproduct recovery as new sources of revenue and savings — not as regulatory burdens. That is precisely the argument we have made to you in Updates #85, #97, and #102 about dry baghouse systems and rock flour revenue at APOs. Best practices did not bankrupt the paper industry. They made it a better neighbor, and it kept making money.

Sound Familiar? It Should.
Paper mills, before 1998: An anchor industry and major employer. Self-regulated pollution control. Communities absorbing the air and water cost. “This is just how the industry works” as the standing excuse.

Quarries and APOs, today: An anchor industry and tax base. Self-certified dust and stormwater plans. Communities absorbing the air and water cost — with zero air monitoring stations anywhere in Burnet County despite roughly 20 active APOs. “We can't afford to change” as the standing excuse.

The lesson from East Texas's own history is simple: it took mandatory best-practices technology standards — not a shutdown, not a moratorium — to fix the paper industry. The same fix is sitting right in front of the Texas Legislature today for rock quarries and APOs.

What This Means for Our Fight
We want to be as clear with Sen. Perry's and Rep. Harris's committees as we have always been with you: we are not asking anyone to ban quarries. We never have. We are asking Texas to do at the state level, for APOs, exactly what the federal government eventually did for paper mills — require the technology that already exists and already works. Specifically, we are asking legislators to support:

County air quality monitoring in any county with a meaningful concentration of APOs — Burnet County, with roughly 20 APOs and zero state monitors, is the clearest possible example.
A statewide best-practices dust suppression standard — dry baghouse/vacuum filtration and haul-road paving — for new and expanding APOs, with a real-world payback of about two years at the industry's own numbers.
A surface water and runoff preservation requirement, with the LCRA given a defined role in watersheds that feed public water supplies, fish hatcheries, and lakes.
A youth camp and sensitive site blasting buffer, with mandatory monitoring and automatic blast suspension near licensed youth camps, state parks, and National Natural Landmarks.

Just like chlorine-free bleaching and secondary treatment did not end the paper industry, none of these requirements would end the aggregate industry in Texas. They would simply require it to operate the way a good neighbor operates.

What You Can Do Right Now
Continue writing to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and Speaker Burrows — their continued support carries this fight forward every single session. CLICK HERE for our full Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory with mailing addresses, phone numbers, and web contact forms for the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker, Senator Flores, and Representative Troxclair.

Share this update with every neighbor, rancher, and landowner you know in Burnet County. The Piney Woods paper mill story is one of the most powerful things we've found yet — because it proves this fight has already been won once before, in Texas, without shutting down an industry.

Use the five sample letters below as your template — or CLICK HERE to find them anytime at SaveBurnet.com/write-to-your-legislators.html.

One hundred and three updates in, we are not just fighting for a permit decision. We are asking Texas to learn from its own history. East Texas figured out how to keep a heavy industry, its jobs, and its profits — while finally protecting the families who live next to it. Burnet County deserves the same chance.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Five Sample Letters You Can Use Today
Handwritten letters carry more weight in a legislative office than any email or petition. Choose the letter below that matches your concern, personalize it with your own story, and mail or deliver it to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and Speaker Burrows. Full mailing addresses are in the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com.

SAMPLE LETTER 1 — PROTECTING LONGHORN CAVERN STATE PARK

(Personalize with your own story before sending — address to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and/or Speaker Burrows)

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, TX Zip]
[Date]

[Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows]
[Office Address — see the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com]
Austin, Texas 78711

Dear [Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows],
I am writing to ask for your leadership in protecting Longhorn Cavern State Park, a National Natural Landmark formed over 500 million years inside the Ellenburger Limestone. The proposed Asphalt Inc. rock-crushing quarry on FM 3509 would conduct daily industrial blasting less than three miles from the cavern.

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has taken a positive first step by engaging Raba Kistner, Inc. to monitor the cavern for vibration and structural damage. But the current monitoring plan relies on a vibration threshold designed to protect drywall and wood-frame houses — not a 500-million-year-old cave with documented collapse zones and areas where the ceiling is at its thinnest. The proposed baseline period is as short as 20 working days, when a full year is needed to distinguish blasting damage from natural seasonal movement.

I am asking you to support legislation requiring cave- and karst-specific vibration standards, a minimum 12-month pre-blasting baseline, and independent, agency-funded geological monitoring before any blasting permit is approved within a defined distance of a Texas state park. Under Texas Parks and Wildlife Code §13.101, TPWD already has authority to protect park resources — state law should make that protection automatic, not something a park has to fight for county by county.

Respectfully,

____________________________

[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
[Your Address & Phone]

SAMPLE LETTER 2 — YOUTH CAMP SAFETY — BLASTING AND AIR QUALITY

(Personalize with your own story before sending — address to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and/or Speaker Burrows)

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, TX Zip]
[Date]

[Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows]
[Office Address — see the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com]
Austin, Texas 78711

Dear [Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows],

I am writing as a Texan who cares about the safety of our children. The proposed Asphalt Inc. rock-crushing quarry on FM 3509 would sit directly adjacent to Camp Longhorn, a youth camp that has operated on Inks Lake since the 1950s. Camp Longhorn campers live, sleep, and spend all of their time outdoors, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, during the camp season — with no HVAC filtration and no walls between them and the plant.

Daily industrial blasting produces not only ground vibration but an audible concussive shock and toxic combustion gases, including nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide, that can travel through karst fractures and settle in low-lying outdoor areas. At the same time, rock crushing and heavy diesel truck traffic generate fine particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), including crystalline silica dust, that these children would breathe with no relief.

I am asking you to champion legislation establishing an enforceable no-blasting buffer around state-licensed youth camps, requiring continuous air quality monitoring at any APO located near a camp, school, or residential area, and requiring pre-blasting safety and evacuation protocols wherever a licensed youth camp sits within the buffer zone. Our children's safety should not depend on which county they happen to camp in.

Respectfully,

____________________________

[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
[Your Address & Phone]


SAMPLE LETTER 3 — HOLD QUARRIES TO THE SAME STANDARD AS DATA CENTERS

(Personalize with your own story before sending — address to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and/or Speaker Burrows)

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, TX Zip]
[Date]

[Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows]
[Office Address — see the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com]
Austin, Texas 78711

Dear [Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows],

I am writing to ask that the Legislature apply the same scrutiny to rock quarries and Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) that it is currently applying to data centers — and with greater urgency, given the permanence of the damage involved.

Texas lawmakers have rightly raised alarms about data centers' water and grid demands. But newer data center campuses are actively adopting closed-loop and air-cooled systems that cut water use dramatically — one Texas facility used just 10,000 gallons in all of 2024. A rock quarry has no comparable path to redemption: every gallon pumped for dust suppression is pulled directly from a local aquifer and does not come back, and when a quarry closes, it leaves behind a permanent crater and fractured geology that can never be restored. A data center site can be repurposed. A quarry site cannot.

The proposed FM 3509 quarry has requested a permit to pump groundwater from the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer — the same aquifer that supplies neighboring private wells — with no drought contingency plan required of an industrial user, even while residential customers face mandatory conservation stages.

I am asking you to ensure that any legislative package addressing industrial water users treats APOs and quarries with at least the same urgency as data centers, given the irreversible nature of aquifer depletion and land destruction involved.

Respectfully,

____________________________

[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
[Your Address & Phone]


SAMPLE LETTER 4 — REQUIRE DRY PLANT / BEST-PRACTICES TECHNOLOGY STATEWIDE

(Personalize with your own story before sending — address to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and/or Speaker Burrows)

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, TX Zip]
[Date]

[Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows]
[Office Address — see the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com]
Austin, Texas 78711

Dear [Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows],

I am writing to ask for your support of legislation requiring dry plant (baghouse and vacuum filtration) technology as the standard for new Aggregate Production Operations across Texas.

The proposed Asphalt Inc. quarry on FM 3509 has requested a permit to pump up to 216,000 gallons per day from the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer, primarily to spray water into the air for dust suppression. Proven dry plant technology — already in use in Europe and adopted at a quarry in Hays County in our same Hill Country geology — captures over 99.5% of fine dust, including crystalline silica, without spraying a single gallon of groundwater. Independent economic analysis shows a dry plant system pays for itself in roughly two years through operating savings and the sale of recovered rock flour, and continues saving money every year after that.

There is no engineering reason a modern quarry needs to draw hundreds of thousands of gallons a day from a shared aquifer. There is only a business decision — and current law does not require operators to make the responsible one. I am asking you to support statewide legislation requiring dry plant baghouse technology as a condition of any new industrial-scale groundwater permit for an APO, before that permit is ever granted.

Respectfully,

____________________________

[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
[Your Address & Phone]


SAMPLE LETTER 5 — A FOUR-MILE NO-BLASTING BUFFER FOR STATE PARKS AND YOUTH CAMPS

(Personalize with your own story before sending — address to Governor Abbott, Lt. Governor Patrick, and/or Speaker Burrows)

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, TX Zip]
[Date]

[Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows]
[Office Address — see the Texas Legislative Advocacy Directory at SaveBurnet.com]
Austin, Texas 78711

Dear [Governor Abbott / Lt. Governor Patrick / Speaker Burrows],
I am writing to ask for your support of a statewide, enforceable buffer prohibiting quarry blasting operations within four miles of any Texas state park or any state-licensed youth camp.

Camp Longhorn, Camp Buckner, and Inks Lake and Longhorn Cavern State Parks near the proposed FM 3509 quarry make the stakes plain: children sleeping outdoors and 500-million-year-old cave formations deserve the same, uniform level of protection no matter which Texas county they happen to sit in.

I am asking you to champion a bill establishing a clear, four-mile no-blasting buffer around both state parks and state-licensed youth camps statewide — not a patchwork of county-by-county fights, but one consistent standard that protects Texas families and Texas heritage sites alike.

Respectfully,

____________________________

[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
[Your Address & Phone]

update 102 - $1.1 Million Investment That Pays for Itself in Two Years — And Saves Our Aquifer While It Does

As shown in Picture above, transitioning from a traditional wet spray system to a modern dry baghouse system is a win-win for both industry economics and regional environmental policy. On the left, the business case proves that a $1.1 million capital investment quickly pays for itself in less than two years, generating approximately $585,000 annually in operating savings and new revenue from marketable rock flour. On the right, the policy case demonstrates why a dry plant mandate is critical for local water security: it saves over 75 million gallons of groundwater annually, provides regulators with 100% verifiable compliance records, and eliminates the risk of chalky sludge runoff into Peters Creek, Spring Creek, and local natural swimming holes. Requiring these industry best practices ensures that local operations remain profitable without forcing the community to sacrifice its shared aquifers and pristine waterways.

7/3/26

Friends of Save Burnet,
We have been asking one question since the beginning of this campaign: why is Asphalt Inc. planning to pump up to 216,000 gallons of Burnet County groundwater every single day when proven technology already exists that would reduce that demand by approximately 95%?

In this update, we are going to show you the math — in plain language. Because it turns out the answer to that question is not "they can't afford it." The answer is that a dry plant system, using baghouse filtration instead of water spray, would pay for itself in roughly two years. After that, it saves the company money every year going forward — while saving our aquifer at the same time.

There is no engineering reason this quarry has to use our water. There is only a business decision. And the numbers show it is the wrong one.

WHAT IS A DRY PLANT — AND WHY DOES IT MATTER?
A traditional wet spray quarry — like the one Asphalt Inc. has proposed — uses water to knock dust down at every point where rock is crushed, screened, or transferred on a conveyor belt. The TCEQ air permit for this quarry identifies 37 emission monitoring points. Thirty-six of those locations will have spray bars with 1 to 5 nozzles each — up to 180 nozzles in total — spraying Hickory Aquifer water continuously for up to 12 hours a day, seven days a week.

A dry plant baghouse system works completely differently. Instead of spraying water at dust, it captures dust mechanically — pulling air through sealed enclosures at each crush and transfer point, running it through fabric filter bags, and collecting the dust as a dry powder. No water. No spray nozzles. No mud. No sludge ponds.

A dry baghouse system captures more than 99.5% of fine respirable dust — including crystalline silica — without using a single drop of groundwater at the processing plant.

This is not experimental technology. It has been in use in Europe for decades. And right here in Texas, a quarry in Hays County — KBDJ Conservation Land & Quarry in the same limestone Hill Country geology as Burnet County — was one of the first in the state to adopt it. KBDJ cut water use by at least 80%, kept operating profitably, and became a model for what responsible quarry operation looks like.

WHAT ASPHALT INC.'S OWN PERMIT SHOWS
We did the math directly from Asphalt Inc.'s own TCEQ air quality permit. Here is what they are planning to spray — at their processing plant alone, before a single water truck rolls out onto the haul roads:

That last line is worth reading twice. The TCEQ air permit authorizes spray bars alone to use up to 388,800 gallons per day. The groundwater permit requests only 216,000 gallons per day — for the entire operation including haul roads, equipment washing, and everything else. There is a significant question here that SaveBurnet.com has flagged: how does Asphalt Inc. reconcile these two numbers?

THE TRUE COST OF A WET SPRAY SYSTEM
Here is something that rarely gets discussed: a wet spray system is not cheap to run. Most people think about the water. But the real cost is in everything surrounding the water.

Those 150 nozzles operate on Hickory Sandstone Aquifer water drawn from over 750 feet underground. That water carries dissolved minerals — calcium, iron, silica — that clog nozzle orifices at 30 psi on a constant basis. A clogged nozzle during production is not just a maintenance problem. It is an immediate TCEQ air permit violation, because visible dust escaping an uncovered crusher is evidence of noncompliance. The only legal fix is to shut down that part of the plant.

Then there are the water trucks. A 200 TPH quarry on 350 acres of unpaved roads needs 2 to 3 dedicated water trucks running all day to keep the haul roads from generating clouds of silica dust. Each truck burns 8 gallons of diesel per hour. Each truck needs a full-time driver. Each driver costs $22 to $26 per hour before benefits. This adds up fast.

Here is what the full wet system costs every year, based on industry data and Asphalt Inc.'s own permit specifications:

WHAT A DRY PLANT ACTUALLY COSTS
A dry baghouse system for a 200 TPH operation covering all 36 emission points — fully installed, with road paving to reduce water truck passes — costs between $890,000 and $1,500,000 as a one-time capital investment. The planning midpoint is $1.1 to $1.2 million.

A dry plant does not eliminate water trucks entirely — haul roads still need some moisture in Texas heat. But published case studies show that dry plant adoption combined with chemical road treatment reduces water truck activity by 50% to 77%. We use the conservative 50% figure in our analysis.

Here is what annual operating costs look like under a dry plant system:

THE BONUS THEY ARE LEAVING ON THE TABLE
Here is something Asphalt Inc. may not want you to know. When a baghouse captures dust from rock crushing, it does not produce waste. It produces a dry, fine-grained powder called "rock flour" — and rock flour is a valuable commercial product used as mineral filler in asphalt and concrete mixes.

In a wet system, that same material ends up as sludge in a settling pond. It has to be dredged, hauled, and disposed of. In a dry system, it gets collected, bagged, and sold.

At a 200 TPH operation generating approximately 2 to 3 percent fines by weight, a dry plant captures roughly 4 to 6 tons of rock flour per operating hour. At $15 to $25 per ton, that is $190,000 to $470,000 per year in additional revenue — from material that the wet plant turns into a disposal problem.

THE PAYBACK — WHAT THE NUMBERS SHOW

WHAT A GOOD NEIGHBOR LOOKS LIKE
Save Burnet has never said that Burnet County cannot have a quarry. What we have said — from the very beginning — is that a quarry does not have to drain our aquifer, cloud our air, and threaten our children's health to be profitable. The technology to do better exists. It is affordable. It pays for itself. And it has been proven right here in Texas.

A quarry that chooses dry plant technology becomes a fundamentally different kind of neighbor. One that does not compete with every rancher, homeowner, and small farm in the county for water from the same aquifer. One that does not generate silica dust clouds over a youth camp where children sleep in open-air cabins. One that can offer to use its already-drilled wells to monitor groundwater quality for the community, rather than depleting it.

KBDJ in Hays County made that choice. Its president said it plainly: "It is in the best interests of both our company and our industry to invest in technology that sustains the communities in which we operate."

Construction Partners Inc. — the Alabama corporation behind Asphalt Inc. — has the financial resources to make the same choice. They are a NYSE-listed company with a market capitalization in the hundreds of millions of dollars. A $1.2 million dry plant investment is not a hardship for a company of their size. It is a choice about whether they want to be a neighbor or a taker.

We are asking them to be a neighbor. And we are asking every regulator, legislator, and official who reviews this permit to require them to be one.

A DRY SYSTEM IS EASIER FOR REGULATORS TO ENFORCE — AND THAT MATTERS
There is one more benefit of a dry baghouse system that does not get enough attention: it is vastly easier to monitor, regulate, and enforce than a wet spray system. This matters for TCEQ, for the CTGCD, and for every Burnet County taxpayer who ultimately funds the regulatory agencies that are supposed to keep industrial operations accountable.

With a wet spray system, enforcement is essentially impossible in real time. TCEQ inspectors cannot easily verify whether 150 spray nozzles across 36 locations are actually flowing at the permitted rate, whether nozzles are clogged, or whether the system is even operating when no inspector is present. Compliance depends almost entirely on the operator self-reporting — the same "honor system" we documented in Update #97 regarding stormwater plans.

A dry baghouse system is the opposite. Every filter bag change is a documented event — dated, logged, and tied to the quantity of dust captured. The weight of material collected in each bag change directly reflects how much crushing activity occurred and how much dust was generated. This creates an automatic, verifiable record of both production volume and dust capture efficiency that a wet spray system can never provide. Stack testing at a baghouse is straightforward, reproducible, and produces clear pass/fail data. There is nothing comparable available for a network of spray nozzles.

A dry baghouse system creates a self-documenting compliance record with every filter change. A wet spray system leaves regulators relying on the operator's word.

This means less regulatory burden on TCEQ staff, fewer disputed enforcement actions, and a cleaner paper trail if violations do occur. A quarry that genuinely wants to be a compliant, accountable neighbor should prefer the dry system for exactly this reason. The fact that Asphalt Inc. has not proposed it tells you something about their intentions.

THE LCRA AND OUR WATERWAYS: A WET PLANT PUTS BOTH AT RISK
The proposed quarry site sits within the LCRA Highland Lakes Watershed, and the stormwater runoff from a wet spray operation flows in two directions — both of them directly into water that our community depends on.

To the west, Peters Creek drains from the quarry site through a natural swimming hole at Camp Longhorn and continues downstream to Lake LBJ, where it enters at the Inks Dam National Fish Hatchery — a federally operated facility that raises millions of fish for the Highland Lakes chain each year. A wet quarry operation produces "rock flour slurry" — a fine, chalky mud created when spray water mixes with crushed limestone dust. In a significant rain event, that slurry does not stay in a retention pond. SaveBurnet.com documented on July 4, 2025, that rainfall at this site filled and overflowed a 20-acre-foot retention pond in just a few hours, with enough force to uproot 30-foot oak trees. That slurry goes directly into Peters Creek — and directly into the fish hatchery area.

To the north, Spring Creek drains from the quarry site toward Inks Lake, where it enters at Devil's Backbone Cove. That cove is where the City of Burnet draws approximately 50% of its municipal drinking water. Chemical dust suppressants, silica fines, diesel residue, and equipment wash water all become part of that runoff in a wet operation. In a dry plant, the vast majority of that contamination risk is eliminated at the source — because there is no spray water, no slurry, and no chemical additives in the processing plant.

A dry plant protects Peters Creek, the Inks Dam Fish Hatchery, Spring Creek, and the City of Burnet's drinking water intake — all at once. The LCRA has every reason to support this technology requirement.

We are formally calling on the LCRA to take notice of this distinction in its review of the applicant's watershed management plans. A dry plant system is not just a groundwater protection measure — it is a surface water protection measure that directly benefits the Highland Lakes, the federally operated fish hatchery on Lake LBJ, and the municipal water supply of the City of Burnet.

WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW
•  Contact CTGCD General Manager Mitchell Sodek directly — tell him you support either denying the permit outright or conditioning any approval on mandatory dry plant baghouse technology by limit pumping to under 20,000 Gal per day.
Mitchell Sodek, General Manager: [email protected]  |  (512) 756-4900  |  303 Bluebonnet Dr., Burnet, TX 78611

•  Contact Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Sen. Pete Flores — ask them to support legislation requiring dry plant technology as the standard for all new APOs with industrial-level water permits.

•  Contact the LCRA — ask them to require dry plant technology as a condition of any watershed permit, citing the runoff risks to Peters Creek, the Inks Dam Fish Hatchery, Spring Creek, and Devil's Backbone Cove.

•  Share this update — send it to every neighbor, rancher, and landowner you know in Burnet County. The math in this update is the most powerful argument we have made yet. Share it widely.

•  READ THE FULL TECHNICAL ANALYSIS — SaveBurnet.com has published the complete sourced technical cost backup document with all permit data, cost tables, industry citations, and payback calculations. CLICK HERE to download it from SaveBurnet.com.

Send your letters today expressing your opposition to Asphalt Inc.'s (CPI) plan to use industrial level groundwater pumping at the proposed rock quarry in Burnet, Texas.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay Together.

SaveBurnet.com
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 101 - Texas is Running out of water -- so why would we give it to a quarry? 

This side-by-side graphic illustrates the dramatic contrast between the high-impact, standard practices of the proposed Asphalt Inc. rock quarry and a sustainable, closed-loop alternative. The left side shows an inefficient standard operation consuming up to 216,000 gallons of groundwater a day for dust suppression, leaving a heavy blanket of dust and mud. In contrast, the right side depicts a modern, closed vacuum and baghouse filtration system that slashes water usage to under 20,000 gallons per day while capturing 99.8% of dust emissions through paved, swept driveways.

6/26/26

Friends of Save Burnet,
This is Update #101, and we’re bringing you a story that connects directly to the fight on FM 3509 — and it comes straight from the Texas Capitol, dated June 24, 2026.

  What Happened in Austin This Week
Texas water officials appeared before the House Natural Resources Committee on June 24th and delivered a stark message: Texas is in a water crisis, costs are soaring, and funding cannot keep up.

Bryan McMath, Executive Director of the Texas Water Development Board, told lawmakers the new draft 2027 State Water Plan carries a $174 billion price tag. The State Water Implementation Fund (SWIFT) — Texas’s primary financing tool for water infrastructure — received $4.2–$4.3 billion in approved project requests last year but could only fund $2 billion of them. The flood infrastructure fund was six times oversubscribed. The $1 billion per year constitutional amendment voters approved won’t deliver its first grants until 2028 at the earliest.

The headline from this week’s hearing: Texas is already behind, the gap is growing, and there is no easy fix on the horizon.
#100  --  A Milestone in Our Fight
  Read the full article: Texas water officials seek more funding as crisis worsens, costs soar: ‘This is not going to stop’

The Data Center Debate — And Why Quarries Deserve Equal Scrutiny
The hearing also put a spotlight on data centers, which have become the dominant water-and-power controversy in Texas politics. Between 2023 and 2025, the number of data centers surveyed by the TWDB exploded from 22 to 341. Researchers at UT Austin warn they could account for 9% of Texas’s total water use by 2040. Lawmakers are alarmed, and the pressure for new regulations is building.

We understand that alarm — and as we made clear in Update #98, we support that conversation. But we are going to say it again, loudly:

If the Legislature is ready to regulate data centers over water consumption, it has a moral and legislative obligation to apply that same scrutiny — with even greater urgency — to rock quarries and APOs.

Newer data centers are actively adopting closed-loop and air-cooled systems that slash water use dramatically. The industry is being pushed toward better technology and is responding. A rock quarry has no such redemption arc. Every gallon pumped for dust suppression is pulled directly from the local aquifer — the same aquifer your neighbor’s well draws from — and it does not come back.

The proposed FM 3509 operation has requested up to 216,000 gallons per day from the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer. As we documented in Update #98, a dry plant baghouse and vacuum filtration system — technology that exists today and represents genuine best practices in the APO industry — could reduce that demand by more than 95%, down to 10,000–20,000 gallons per day. The Legislature is praising data centers for adopting efficiency technology. We are asking: why isn’t Asphalt Inc. being required to do the same before a single drop of Burnet County groundwater is pumped?

  No Drought Plan. No Curtailment. No Accountability.
Asphalt Inc. has stated in their own Operating Permit Application filed with the CTGCD that, as an industrial user, they are not required to submit a drought contingency plan. While Burnet County families are asked to limit outdoor watering to one day a week during drought, this industrial operation would face no mandatory curtailment. Their own hydrogeologist’s report acknowledges that neighboring wells within 1,000 feet of the northern property boundary could experience up to 143 feet of drawdown over 30 years of continuous pumping.

Texas legislators testified this week that the state needs $174 billion just to protect its water future. The CTGCD is being asked — right now — to hand an out-of-state industrial operation a permit to pump indefinitely from the aquifer our community depends on, with no drought safeguards, no efficiency requirements, and no accountability to neighboring landowners.

  Our Ask of the CTGCD
The Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District has both the authority and the responsibility to protect existing well users and the long-term health of our shared aquifer. We are asking the Board to:

1.      Deny the permit outright, given the documented risk to neighboring wells, the absence of any drought contingency plan, the ready availability of dry plant technology that makes this volume of groundwater extraction unnecessary, and the broader statewide water emergency now being debated at the Capitol; or

2.     Cap permitted pumping at no more than 10,000–15,000 gallons per day — the amount consistent with genuine APO industry best practices using dry plant baghouse and vacuum filtration systems. This is not an arbitrary number. It reflects what a responsibly operated quarry actually needs when it employs the best available technology. If Asphalt Inc. is unwilling to adopt those practices, that unwillingness speaks for itself.

If a permit is issued, it should include mandatory drawdown monitoring, automatic curtailment tied to drought stages, and full water-balance reporting.

  What You Can Do Right Now
•        Contact the CTGCD Board directly — tell them you oppose the Asphalt Inc. groundwater permit, or demand it be capped at no more than 10,000–15,000 gallons per day with full drought accountability requirements. You can reach them three ways:

  Call: (512) 756-4900

  Email: [email protected]

  Visit their NEW office: 303 Bluebonnet Dr., Burnet, TX 78611

  Online: www.centraltexasgcd.org

General Manager: Mitchell Sodek  |  [email protected]

•        Contact Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores — ask them to apply the same legislative scrutiny being directed at data centers to rock quarries and APOs. Their contact information is on the SaveBurnet.com website, Click here to access.

•        Share this update with every neighbor, rancher, and landowner you know in Burnet County.

•        Watch for the CTGCD hearing date — your presence at the Board meeting is one of the most powerful things you can do.

Texas water officials told the Legislature this week: “This is not going to stop.” The crisis is real, and the groundwater beneath us is not inexhaustible. This is exactly the wrong moment to issue an industrial pumping permit at 216,000 gallons per day when proven technology exists to accomplish the same work at a fraction of that demand.

We are 101 updates strong — and we are not stopping.


The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
t
Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 100 - A milestone in our fight

Working together, this community has already moved mountains. Now we need every voice in Burnet County to reach Austin. Write to Rep. Troxclair and Sen. Flores today — your letter could be the one that makes the difference.

6/19/26

The SaveBurnet.com Team
#100  --  A Milestone in Our Fight
It’s Official: Asphalt Inc. Has Filed for an Industrial Groundwater Permit

Dear Followers,
One hundred updates. When we started SaveBurnet.com, we hoped we would never need to write this many. But here we are — 100 updates in, still standing, still fighting, and now facing the most concrete proof yet that Construction Partners Inc. (CPI) and their Texas subsidiary Asphalt Inc., LLC are moving aggressively to make this quarry a reality. We have the receipts — literally.

BREAKING NEWS: The Permit Application Is Now Official
On May 15, 2026, Asphalt Inc., LLC filed a formal New Large Well Operating Permit Application with the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD). The application, prepared by Westward Environmental, Inc., requests authorization to pump industrial levels of groundwater from two production wells drilled into the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer at FM 3509, Burnet, Texas — the proposed quarry site.

This is no longer a proposed plan. The wells have already been drilled. TR Drilling & Service drilled all three wells in July and August of 2025. The pumping equipment has been selected. The hydrogeologic study has been conducted. CPI and Asphalt Inc. are not waiting around — they are executing their plan on a schedule, and the CTGCD permit decision is the next gate they need to pass through.

  The Numbers — What They Are Asking to Take From Our Aquifer

Here is exactly what Asphalt Inc. has formally requested from the CTGCD:

150 GPM gallons per minute (combined, both wells at full operation)
216,000 GPD gallons per day (at maximum pumping rate)
241.95 ac-ft/yr acre-feet per year (requested annual permit volume)
78,840,000 GPY gallons per year (maximum production rate across both wells)
710.32 acres of land adjacent to an established youth camp, obtained without public disclosure by Asphalt Inc. LLC, for the purpose of a rock quarry,
755 ft. feet deep — the depth of Well #1 (into the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer)
795 ft. feet deep — the depth of Well #2 (into the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer)

Note: The applicant’s own hydrogeologic report projects that, over 30 years of continuous pumping, wells within approximately 1,000 feet of the northern site boundary could experience up to 143 feet of drawdown. For neighbors whose wells sit in that same aquifer, that is the difference between a functioning well and a dry one.

  What This Means: 78.8 million gallons per year, drawn directly from the Hickory Sandstone Aquifer — the same aquifer that feeds the private wells, ranches, and farms of your Burnet County neighbors. This is not a household well. This is industrial-scale extraction from a shared community resource.

  What Asphalt Inc. Plans to Do With This Water
According to the application, the groundwater will be used for: dust suppression, supplementing stormwater and recycled water in the aggregate production process, equipment washing, and other industrial uses. In plain language: they plan to pump nearly 79 million gallons of Burnet County’s groundwater every year — primarily to spray it into the air as dust control over a rock quarry.

As we documented in Update #97, a Dry Plant baghouse filtration system could reduce this demand by over 95% — to just 10,000–20,000 gallons per day. Asphalt Inc. has not proposed that technology. They are asking to use our water instead.

  The Blasting Threat to Longhorn Cavern State Park
The groundwater permit is only one of the threats this quarry poses. The proposed FM 3509 site sits less than three miles from Longhorn Cavern State Park — a National Natural Landmark that took 500 million years to form inside the Ellenburger Limestone. Daily industrial blasting at this distance poses a real and documented risk to the cavern’s delicate formations, ceilings, and previously collapsed zones.

As we reported in Update #99, TPWD has engaged Raba Kistner, Inc. to monitor the cavern for vibration damage. That is a meaningful step. But we have formally asked TPWD to expand that monitoring scope to use cave-specific vibration standards — not the residential housing standard currently proposed. TPWD has proactively upgraded and enhanced their monitoring process of Longhorn Cavern — and for that we applaud and support their actions. SaveBurnet.com would still request a full 12-month baseline period before any blasting begins.

  Dust, Air Pollution & the Children of Camp Longhorn
Directly adjacent to the proposed quarry site is Camp Longhorn — one of Texas’s most beloved youth summer camps, operating on the shores of Inks Lake since the 1950s. Unlike children in air-conditioned schools, Camp Longhorn campers live, eat, sleep, and play entirely outdoors 24 hours a day, 7 days a week during the camp season. The fine particulate dust (PM2.5 and PM10) and crystalline silica generated by daily rock crushing and heavy diesel truck traffic would blanket this outdoor environment with no respite for hundreds of children. This is not a theoretical concern. It is a documented public health risk that has received no meaningful attention in Asphalt Inc. / CPI’s permit applications.

  Contaminated Runoff & the Highland Lakes
The proposed quarry sits within the LCRA Highland Lakes Watershed. Stormwater runoff from the site — carrying rock flour, chemical dust suppressants, diesel fuel residue, and heavy machinery pollutants — has the potential to enter the local creek and drainage systems that ultimately flow into the Colorado River and the Highland Lakes chain. This is the same water system that supports Inks Lake, Lake LBJ, Lake Travis, and the drinking water supply for hundreds of thousands of Central Texans downstream. Unlike the state’s self-certified stormwater plan system, the LCRA’s Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance does require explicit submission and approval of drainage and pollution management plans. We are actively monitoring Asphalt Inc / CPI’s LCRA filings.

  Your Voice Matters — Take Action This Week
The CTGCD permit application is now on file. The clock is ticking. This is the moment when community voices matter most — before a permit is granted, not after. We are asking every follower of SaveBurnet.com to take one concrete action this week:

Send a handwritten letter to our state legislators.

Handwritten letters carry more weight than emails in legislative offices. They represent real constituents who took real time. We are asking you to write to Senator Pete Flores and Representative Ellen Troxclair asking them to support legislation that demands best practices for rock quarries — protecting our water, our air, our state parks, and our children.

Senator Pete Flores — Texas Senate, District 24
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station, Austin, TX 78711

Representative Ellen Troxclair — Texas House, District 19
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 12910, Austin, TX 78711

Not sure what to write? Visit SaveBurnet.com where we have posted five sample letter templates covering each of the key issues: water, blasting, air quality, stormwater runoff, and children’s health. Use any of them as a starting point and make it your own. Your personal story is more powerful than any template. CLICK HERE to access the sample letters.

  What to Ask For: Ask your legislators to support legislation requiring: (1) mandatory dry plant / baghouse technology for new APOs to reduce groundwater pumping; (2) enforceable blasting buffer zones around Texas state parks; (3) TCEQ air quality monitoring at all APOs adjacent to youth camps or residential areas; (4) LCRA-level watershed protection standards applied to all quarry stormwater plans; and (5) independent pre-blasting geological studies before any APO permit is approved near a state park.

One hundred updates. One community. One fight that is far from over.

They have the permits. We have the people.

Pick up a pen. Your handwriting could save a cavern.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Loud. Stay United.


The SaveBurnet.com Team

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
t
Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 99 - TPWD Takes Action — And We Need Them to Go Further

The images above tell the story that no permit application ever will. On one side: the ancient silence of Longhorn Cavern — 500 million years of irreplaceable geological artistry, formed drop by drop, crystal by crystal, deep beneath the Texas Hill Country. On the other: the raw, earth-shaking violence of industrial quarry blasting — the kind that will occur, repeatedly, every single working day, just three miles away. The question every Texan should be asking is simple: why would we allow this? Why would Texas Parks and Wildlife permit an Alabama corporation to detonate industrial explosives three miles from one of our most treasured state parks — a cavern that nature spent half a billion years building — without first demanding every possible protection, study, and safeguard that science can provide?

6/13/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
Dear Followers,

We have significant news to share — and for once, it begins with good news. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) has taken a meaningful step to protect Longhorn Cavern State Park. They have engaged Raba Kistner, Inc. (RKI), one of Texas’s most respected forensic engineering firms, to perform professional vibration and structural monitoring of the cavern in direct response to the proposed rock crushing facility on FM 3509.
This is exactly the kind of proactive action we have been asking for, and the SaveBurnet.com community deserves significant credit for pushing TPWD to take it seriously. We are genuinely grateful. TPWD is doing the right thing, and we want our followers, our legislative allies, and the public record to reflect that clearly.
However, after a careful review of RKI’s Scope of Work (Proposal PSR26-021-00, dated June 8, 2026), we have identified several significant gaps in the proposed monitoring plan that, if left unaddressed, could leave the cavern dangerously underprotected. We believe these gaps are not intentional — they reflect the limits of what was asked for. Our job is to make sure TPWD knows to ask for more.

A Message of Gratitude to TPWD: The decision to engage a professional forensic engineering firm to monitor Longhorn Cavern before quarry operations begin is the right call — and it sets a precedent that should apply to every state park near a proposed APO in Texas. We applaud Dr. David Yoskowitz and the TPWD Infrastructure Division for this action. We are asking TPWD to go a step further — not because what they have done is wrong, but because Longhorn Cavern is irreplaceable, and the threat posed by an out-of-state industrial corporation deserves every safeguard available.

What TPWD Has Commissioned — And Why It Matters
Raba Kistner, Inc. is an Engineering News-Record Top 200 firm with over 55 years of Texas engineering history — the same firm that worked on the Alamo renovation, State Highway 130, and the UTSA main campus. Their engagement here is not a token gesture. The $162,600 scope of work includes:

LiDAR Scanning: A full interior survey of the cavern using 360-degree laser scanning technology that creates a precise millimeter-level digital map of every wall, ceiling, formation, and feature. This establishes an irreplaceable “before” picture of the cavern’s exact geometry.
Vibration Monitoring: Four Micromate geophone sensors installed inside the cavern and at the surface property line to continuously measure ground vibration in real time. If a blast event exceeds safety levels, TPWD is notified immediately by email.
Baseline + One Year of Monitoring: A pre-operations baseline assessment followed by 12 months of continuous data collection, with monthly written reports delivered to TPWD.
Documented Areas of Concern: RKI has already identified eight high-priority features inside the cavern, including an area of documented previous collapse between Crystal City and Lover’s Lane, and the thinnest section of cave ceiling adjacent to the Powder Room — the most structurally vulnerable points in the entire system.

  Why This Is a Win: Most communities fighting quarries near sensitive geological sites never get this. The mere existence of a professional monitoring program creates a legal and scientific record that makes it far harder for CPI to deny causation if damage occurs. TPWD has given the community a powerful tool.

  Where the Current Plan Falls Short — What We’re Asking TPWD to Fix
We want to be clear: these are not criticisms of Raba Kistner. RKI proposed exactly what a professional firm would propose based on the assignment they were given. The gaps below are in what TPWD asked for — and they are gaps that a large, well-funded, out-of-state corporation like Construction Partners Inc. (CPI) will absolutely exploit if left unaddressed. CPI’s legal team already knows these standards. Our job is to make sure TPWD’s scope closes every door before the first charge is detonated.

  Gap #1: The Wrong Safety Standard for a Cave
The RKI proposal uses the U.S. Bureau of Mines RI-8507 standard as the vibration safety threshold — allowing up to 2.0 inches per second peak particle velocity (PPV) as the maximum safe level. This is the same standard used to protect residential homes with drywall and wood frames. It was developed by studying 76 houses in surface mine blasting zones. It was never designed for — and has never been validated against — a 500-million-year-old limestone cave with irreplaceable formations, previously collapsed sections, and areas where the ceiling is at its thinnest.

Published geotechnical research consistently shows that cave formations — particularly delicate stalactites, calcite crystal deposits, and unsupported ceiling spans — can be damaged at vibration levels far below the residential threshold. Cave protection thresholds in sensitive karst environments are recommended as low as 0.1 to 0.5 in/sec by karst geologists — a fraction of the 2.0 in/sec residential standard RKI is currently proposing to use. Under the current plan, a blast could technically stay “within limits” while cracking stalactites in the Hall of Diamonds that took 100,000 years to form. No alert would trigger. No report would flag it. And CPI would face no consequence.

What We’re Asking: TPWD should require RKI to engage a licensed karst geologist to establish a cave-specific PPV threshold for this specific Ellenburger Limestone formation before any quarry blasting begins. The 2.0 in/sec residential standard must not be used as the sole alert trigger for an irreplaceable state park cave.

  Gap #2: The Baseline Is Too Short
The RKI scope proposes to begin field work within four weeks of receiving written authorization. The baseline data collection could be as little as 20 working days — less than one month — before quarry operations begin.

This is wholly inadequate for a site with the geological complexity of Longhorn Cavern. A credible, legally defensible baseline needs to capture:

Seasonal variation: Limestone caves respond measurably to temperature and humidity changes across all four seasons. Thermal expansion and contraction naturally move formations. A summer-only baseline cannot be distinguished from blasting-induced movement when it comes to litigation.
Natural seismic background: Central Texas has background low-level seismic activity. Without a full year of natural data, it is impossible to prove in court that a recorded vibration event was caused by quarry blasting rather than a natural tremor.
Pre-existing structural behavior: The scope itself identifies “an area of previous collapse between Crystal City and Lover’s Lane” as a high-priority monitoring location. Any natural movement at that specific point must be documented across all seasons before blasting begins — or CPI’s lawyers will argue it was already moving.

What We’re Asking: TPWD should require a minimum of 12 full months of pre-blasting baseline data collection before any quarry land clearing, construction, or blasting is authorized. This is standard practice for vibration monitoring near heritage structures and is the only defensible baseline for future legal action.

  Gap #3: Only Four Sensors for a Multi-Chamber Cave System
RKI proposes four geophones. Longhorn Cavern is a complex, multi-chamber system spanning a significant distance, with eight separately identified areas of structural concern. Four sensors cannot adequately characterize how vibration travels through all of these chambers simultaneously. Additionally, the proposal does not specify whether the Micromate units are three-axis (measuring vibration in all three directions) or single-axis. For a cave system, three-axis measurement is essential — blast energy arrives from multiple directions through fractured limestone and cannot be fully characterized with one-directional sensors.

What We’re Asking: TPWD should expand the geophone network to at least 6–8 three-axis sensors covering all eight identified high-priority zones, including the Hall of Diamonds, Hall of Marble, collapse zone, and the thin ceiling area near the Powder Room. The additional cost of $4,000 per unit is trivial compared to the stakes.

Gap #4: No Airblast Overpressure Monitoring
Quarry blasting produces two distinct physical threats: ground-transmitted seismic waves (which the geophones measure) AND air pressure concussion waves (overpressure). The air overpressure from a blast can travel through the cave entrance and surface openings, creating sudden pressure differentials that stress cave formations entirely independently of ground vibration. The current scope has no provision for monitoring airblast overpressure at all — meaning an entire category of blast damage risk is invisible to TPWD’s monitoring system.

What We’re Asking: Add airblast overpressure sensors at the cave entrance and key interior points, consistent with the RI-8507 standard’s own airblast provisions — which RKI cited but did not propose monitoring for.

  Gap #5: Only 3 of 8 High-Priority Features Get High-Resolution Scans
RKI’s own site assessment identified eight locations as potential areas of structural concern inside the cavern: the Columns, the Council Room, the Giant Jenga, the ceiling in Lover’s Lane, the Attic, the documented collapse zone, the thin ceiling near the Powder Room, and two features near the Wishing Well. The current scope funds high-resolution LiDAR scans of only three of these eight. The remaining five receive only the standard overview scan — insufficient resolution to detect millimeter-scale formation movement. Additional features are available at $4,400 each. For a $162,600 contract protecting an irreplaceable state park, covering all eight is not optional — it is the minimum standard of care.

  What We’re Asking: Expand the high-resolution LiDAR scan to cover all eight identified areas of concern, and mandate quarterly rescans — not just event-triggered scans — for the full duration of quarry operations.

  Gap #6: No Crack Gauges on Known Fracture Zones
The scope makes no provision for crack gauge monitoring on existing fractures and the documented previous collapse zone. Crack gauges are simple, inexpensive instruments that detect sub-millimeter widening of existing cracks over time — providing early warning of structural change that geophone vibration data alone will not capture. They are standard practice in forensic monitoring of historic masonry and cave structures, and their omission from this scope is a gap that should be filled before monitoring begins.

  What We’re Asking: Install crack gauges on identified fractures and the documented collapse zone as a supplemental monitoring layer, providing continuous passive structural movement data independent of vibration event triggers.

  The Bigger Picture: CPI Is Counting on Texas Business Law
Let’s be direct about who we are dealing with. Construction Partners Inc. (CPI) is not a local business with roots in the Texas Hill Country. It is an Alabama-based, publicly traded corporation that has identified Texas’s business-friendly regulatory environment as an opportunity — and is moving aggressively to take advantage of it. Texas’s “rule of capture” allows industrial operators to pump groundwater without limit. TCEQ’s standard permit for rock crushers requires little more than a self-certified checklist. And the standard vibration monitoring framework was designed for houses, not caves.

CPI knows all of this. Their legal and permitting teams are experienced in identifying exactly which standards are the minimum required — and building their operations around those minimums. If TPWD’s monitoring scope stays as currently written, CPI will have already won the legal argument before a single gram of explosive is detonated. Any damage that occurs below 2.0 in/sec will be dismissed. Any formation change that wasn’t captured in the three high-resolution scan zones will be unprovable. And any airblast damage will be completely invisible to the monitoring record.

TPWD has an opportunity right now — before this scope is finalized and before quarry operations begin — to close every one of those gaps. We are asking them to do exactly that, on behalf of the thousands of Texans who visit Longhorn Cavern State Park every year, the children at Camp Longhorn, and the generations who will inherit whatever we choose to protect or sacrifice today.

There is also a compelling and entirely fair argument that CPI and Asphalt Inc. should be required to fund the full cost of all monitoring — not Texas taxpayers and not TPWD’s budget. CPI is the party seeking to profit from industrial operations immediately adjacent to a Texas state park. The entire monitoring program exists solely because of the risk their proposed quarry creates. It is entirely reasonable — and legally precedented — for TPWD to require, as a condition of any operational permit or authorization, that the applicant bear the full cost of independent monitoring. This includes the expanded baseline period, all additional geophone units, quarterly LiDAR rescans, airblast overpressure sensors, and crack gauge installation. Requiring industrial applicants to fund environmental and structural monitoring as a condition of permit approval is standard practice in Texas and across the country. If CPI wants to do business next to Longhorn Cavern State Park, CPI should pay for the privilege of proving it is safe to do so.

Call to Action: Contact Dr. David Yoskowitz, TPWD Executive Director, and ask him to expand the RKI monitoring scope to include all six items listed in this update. Copy State Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores on your message. Contact information is available at SaveBurnet.com.

  Our Six Formal Requests to TPWD
We are formally requesting that TPWD direct RKI to expand the monitoring scope to include:
1.       Cave-Specific PPV Threshold: Engage a licensed karst geologist to establish a Longhorn Cavern-specific vibration alert threshold before any blasting begins. The residential RI-8507 standard must not be the sole cave safety trigger.
2.       12-Month Pre-Blasting Baseline: Require a full year of pre-operations baseline data collection before any quarry land clearing, construction, or blasting is authorized.
3.       Expanded Geophone Network: Increase from 4 to at least 6–8 three-axis sensors covering all eight identified high-priority cave zones.
4.       Airblast Overpressure Monitoring: Add overpressure sensors at the cave entrance and interior points to capture the air concussion component of blast events.
5.       All Eight High-Priority Features Scanned: Expand high-resolution LiDAR to all eight identified areas of concern with quarterly scheduled rescans, not just event-triggered scans of three features.
6.       Crack Gauge Monitoring: Install crack gauges on all identified fracture zones and the documented previous collapse area for continuous passive structural monitoring.
7.     Require CPI to Fund All Monitoring Costs: As a condition of any permit or operational authorization, require Construction Partners Inc. / Asphalt Inc. to bear the full cost of the expanded monitoring program — including all additional sensors, quarterly LiDAR rescans, the 12-month pre-blasting baseline, airblast monitoring, and crack gauge installation. Texas taxpayers and TPWD should not fund the monitoring that exists solely because of the industrial risk CPI has introduced to this community.

TPWD has taken a courageous first step. Now we need them to take the full step.

Longhorn Cavern took 500 million years to form.

CPI will take far less than that to damage it permanently if we let them.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Vigilant.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 98 - correcting the regulatory lens: why quarries and apo's demand our primary legislative focus

5/29/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
Dear Followers,

A major policy debate has taken center stage across the Lone Star State. In May 2026, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller issued a high-profile op-ed calling for a temporary statewide moratorium on new hyperscale data center developments — citing immense concerns over loss of agricultural land, groundwater consumption, and heavy strain on the ERCOT electrical grid. The debate has rapidly gained traction, with residents packing city council chambers and demanding freezes on new tech facilities.

At SaveBurnet.com, we support the spirit of that conversation. But we need to look at this moment through a clear, realistic lens — and use it to our advantage.

Both digital data centers and Aggregate Production Operations (APOs)/rock quarries are, in many ways, necessities for a growing state. We must have computing power for a modern economy, just as we must have local stone, concrete, and asphalt to build highways and homes. Both industries require rigorous governance and tight local controls to ensure they do not become an unmanageable burden on the communities where they operate.

However, a critical distortion is occurring. The public is pushing back hard against data centers — but not nearly hard enough against rock quarries and APOs. While data centers have become the new political lightning rod, the actual, irreversible physical devastation left behind by a rock quarry is vastly more severe and permanent. As our state lawmakers weigh new protections ahead of the next legislative session, we must demand that APOs receive at least as much — if not more — urgent legislative intervention as data centers.

  Our Message: If Commissioner Miller and state leadership are willing to call for a moratorium on data centers over resource concerns, they have a moral and legislative obligation to apply that same scrutiny — with even greater urgency — to rock quarries and APOs.

  The Clear Contrast: Temporary Disruption vs. Permanent Devastation

To understand why our legislative focus must remain fixed on quarries, we must honestly contrast the real, local footprints of these two types of operations:

  Water Allocation & Aquifer Protection
Data centers are real water consumers. A mid-sized hyperscale facility uses approximately 300,000 to 528,000 gallons of water per day, and the largest campuses can draw up to millions of gallons per day — comparable to a small city. The tech industry deserves scrutiny for that. However, a critical and hopeful distinction is already emerging: newer facilities are actively adopting closed-loop and air-cooled systems that dramatically cut water use. Google’s air-cooled Texas facility, for example, used just 10,000 gallons in all of 2024 — a tiny fraction of older evaporative designs. The industry is being pushed toward better technology, and it is responding.

The proposed FM 3509 rock crushing facility has requested up to 300,000 gallons of groundwater per day — pumped from drilled wells that draw directly from the local aquifers. Unlike a data center, which pulls from a municipal utility line, this quarry would be extracting directly from the same groundwater system that supplies neighboring residential wells, farms, and ranches in Burnet County. Every gallon pumped for dust suppression is a gallon permanently removed from the local aquifers.

Critically, a better option exists right now. A “Dry Plant” baghouse and vacuum filtration system — the same class of technology upgrade that data centers are being praised for adopting — can reduce a quarry’s water demand from 300,000 gallons per day down to just 10,000 to 20,000 gallons per day. That is a reduction of over 95%. Just as we applaud data centers for moving to closed-loop cooling, we must demand that Asphalt Inc. and CPI adopt dry plant technology before a single drop of Burnet County groundwater is pumped.

  The Parallel Is Exact: Data centers can cut water use 97%+ by switching to closed-loop cooling. Rock quarries can cut water use 95%+ by switching to dry plant baghouse systems. Both technologies exist today. The question is whether our regulators will require them — or let industry off the hook.

  Air Quality & Public Health
Once constructed, a data center is operationally a clean, passive warehouse facility — it produces no ambient dust or localized particulate emissions from its daily operations (though it does generate significant indirect emissions through its enormous demand on the ERCOT power grid). A rock crushing quarry, by contrast, is a relentless and direct source of hazardous air pollution. Constant blasting, mechanical crushing, and heavy truck traffic generate heavy clouds of fugitive particulate matter (PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅), including harmful crystalline silica dust that floats into surrounding neighborhoods — posing severe, well-documented respiratory risks to nearby families, including children.

  Scale, Land Use & the Legacy Left Behind
A data center typically occupies a concentrated footprint — often a single city block or a contained industrial park. If it shuts down, it leaves behind standard commercial warehouse structures that can be repurposed for light manufacturing, logistics, or other uses. The land remains intact.

A rock quarry demands an expansive footprint — routinely 500 to several thousand acres of natural Texas topography. When an APO shuts down, the property is left permanently destroyed. The natural landscape is gone. What remains are irreversible craters and fractured geological layers that cannot be restored. No future generation can undo that damage.

  Local Workforce Contribution
Despite occupying hundreds to thousands of acres, a rock quarry typically employs a relatively small on-site crew — often in the range of 15 to 30 direct workers for a mid-sized operation. A data center utilizes a far smaller physical footprint yet generally employs more permanent, higher-paid technical operations staff, security personnel, and facilities engineers, while also injecting significant economic activity into the surrounding community during its construction phase.

  Understanding the Financial Penalties

Both operations impose real costs on local citizens, but they hit differently:

•         The Data Center Cost — Your Electric Bill: Data centers place their primary financial penalty on monthly utility bills. Their massive, continuous 24/7 grid draw strains ERCOT and forces billions in new transmission and substation upgrades. Historically, these costs are passed down to all ratepayers. Texas residential electricity rates have risen 30% since 2020 and are projected to climb another 29% by 2030 — driven significantly by large industrial users. The Public Utility Commission is currently under a legislative deadline to rewrite cost-allocation rules before year-end 2026.

•         The Quarry Cost — Your Property Value & Quality of Life:  A rock quarry inflicts a localized financial wound on the surrounding community. Multiple peer-reviewed studies have documented significant property value suppression for homes in close proximity to quarry operations — with the most acute impacts within the nearest mile. Homeowners also face cracked foundations from blasting vibrations, broken windshields, and narrow rural roads choked and degraded by hundreds of heavy diesel dump trucks daily. These impacts are long-term and, in many cases, non-recoverable. Unlike a utility bill adjustment, these losses are permanent and non-recoverable.

  Side-by-Side: The Texas Industrial Footprint


  Moving Forward: Demanding Equal — and Greater — Accountability
Our message at SaveBurnet.com remains clear: we champion smart growth, private enterprise, and innovation — but it must never come at the expense of our families’ health, water security, or financial stability.

If our state leaders are willing to consider a moratorium on data centers because of their resource footprint, they must show the same legislative courage to enforce strict, unyielding guardrails on the aggregate industry. A data center can strain a utility grid. A rock quarry can permanently ruin an aquifer, pollute the air our children breathe, destroy property values, and scar our rural landscape forever. The stakes are not comparable. The legislative response should not be comparable either.

We will continue to aggressively fight in contested case hearings, monitor TCEQ & LCRA permit applications and compliance, and lobby our state representatives to ensure that APOs face the strict oversight they truly deserve. The debate over data centers has opened a door — we intend to walk through it.

  Call to Action: Contact State Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores today. Ask them to support equal or greater legislative scrutiny of APOs and rock quarries as part of any upcoming environmental reform package. Their contact information is on the SaveBurnet.com website.

We champion smart growth. We demand equal accountability.
The Texas Hill Country is not for sale and not for sacrifice.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Vigilant.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 97 - The hidden truth behind quarry dust control & stormwater plans

While heavy industrial water trucks like the one shown above are a standard fixture for spraying down quarry roads, they represent a hidden environmental loophole. To drastically lower high-volume groundwater usage and reduce operational expenses, operators frequently introduce chemical suppressants—such as industrial surfactants, hygroscopic salts, and polymer binders—directly into their water tanks and misting bars. Despite the potential for these chemical additives to leach into the local water table, the State of Texas maintains no public database or registry to monitor their use. The TCEQ does not possess the daily oversight framework or localized manpower required to track these applications, effectively making chemical dust control a self-regulated operation left completely in the hands of the quarry owners themselves.

5/29/26

Update #97: The Hidden Truth Behind Quarry Dust Control & Stormwater Plans

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
Dear Followers,
As we continue to dig deeper into the plans for the proposed rock-crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road (FM 3509), a disturbing picture is emerging. This isn’t just about a local business — it’s about Construction Partners Inc. (CPI), a massive, out-of-state, publicly traded corporation based in Alabama that owns Asphalt Inc. LLC. The corporations count on bureaucratic “blind spots” to operate quietly. We are bringing the facts into the light.

🧪 Part 1: The Chemical Loophole in Our Water Sprays
As we previously exposed, out-of-state operators are preparing to request up to 300,000 gallons of our groundwater per day from the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) — totaling a staggering 110 million gallons annually just to spray into the air for dust control. To stretch that water further and reduce haul frequency, rock quarries across Texas frequently mix industrial chemical additives directly into their water trucks, spray bars, or misting systems.

Here is what you need to know about the chemicals and TCEQ’s hands-off reality:

⚗️ What They Are Adding
When a facility chooses to augment their water system, they typically utilize three classes of industrial chemicals:
• Surfactants: Specialized industrial detergents (such as alcohol ethoxylates) that lower water’s surface tension to trap fine PM2.5 and silica dust particles.
• Hygroscopic Salts: Calcium or magnesium chloride applied to haul roads to pull moisture from the air and suppress road dust.
• Polymer Binders / Lignosulfonates: Wood-pulp byproducts used to glue dust particles into a hard crust on exposed surfaces.

💧 The Groundwater Threat
Both the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the EPA have independently documented that chloride salts are highly water-soluble and do not readily bind to soil particles. In our sensitive karst limestone geography, heavy rains dissolve these chemicals rapidly, allowing them to leach into the ground and migrate into our aquifers with little to no natural filtration. This leads to localized groundwater salinization, increasing total dissolved solids and making well water corrosive, salty, and potentially unsafe for drinking, livestock, and irrigation.

💡 Why Karst Is Especially Vulnerable: The USGS confirms that karst aquifers — like ours in Burnet County — are “highly productive but extremely vulnerable to contamination.” Unlike sandy or clay soils that filter and slow contaminants, our limestone fractures act as express highways, moving pollutants directly into the water supply.

🐟 The Devastating Effect on Aquatic Life
Peer-reviewed research published across multiple environmental science journals highlights a serious ecological threat beyond groundwater. While surfactants biodegrade within weeks in intact topsoil, in quarry environments where the protective topsoil has been completely stripped away, these industrial chemicals migrate directly into groundwater and surface runoff before they can break down. Once they enter our waterways, certain surfactants are highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates like Daphnia magna (water fleas). Water fleas are a critical link at the base of the local aquatic food chain — a key food source for juvenile fish, insects, and amphibians. Poisoning them sends a cascade of harm upward through the entire biological ecosystem of our creeks, rivers, and lakes, from bottom to top.

⚠️ Confirmed by Research: Multiple peer-reviewed studies have documented that anionic and cationic surfactants cause significant mortality in Daphnia magna at low concentrations — in some cases as low as 0.97 × 10⁻² mg/L. This is not a theoretical concern; it is documented aquatic toxicology.

🚨 The TCEQ Blind Spot
Many neighbors assume the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) closely monitors these chemicals. They do not. Under the TCEQ Air Quality Standard Permit for Rock Crushers, the state mandates that dust emissions must be controlled — typically through water sprays. However, if an operator adds surfactants or chemical polymers to their water system, they are generally not required to report the specific chemical, brand, or volume to TCEQ. The agency simply lacks the localized framework and everyday manpower to track or monitor what is being poured into these water tanks, creating a largely self-regulated environment where our watershed is left vulnerable.

💡 Bottom Line: CPI’s Asphalt Inc. could legally mix industrial chemical additives into their dust suppression water with no obligation to disclose the specific chemicals or quantities to state regulators. Our water, our aquifer, and our aquatic ecosystem would bear the consequences.

🗂️ Part 2: The Stormwater Plan Illusion — Self-Controlled & Hidden
Many of you have rightfully asked to see the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3) for the proposed FM 3509 site before construction begins. Texas law does legally require an Aggregate Production Operation (APO) to develop and implement an SWP3 before breaking ground or clearing land. The way the system actually works, however, is deeply concerning.

• Strictly Self-Controlled: A common misconception is that operators must submit their full SWP3 to Austin for rigorous state evaluation and approval. They do not. The entire process relies on an honor-system electronic checklist. The operator writes the plan themselves, logs into TCEQ’s online ePermits system (STEERS), and files a Notice of Intent (NOI). In that digital form, they merely certify under penalty of law that they have written a plan. The actual document content is never reviewed by the state.
• No Public State Database: Because the actual SWP3 document is never physically submitted to TCEQ under standard general permits, there is no public database where citizens can look up or download the plan. The document is kept on-site at the facility — accessible only if an inspector happens to conduct an unannounced visit.
• Ineffective Retention Ponds for Chemicals: The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) acknowledges that traditional Best Management Practices (BMPs) — including retention ponds outlined in the TCEQ RG-500 manual — are designed to capture solid sediment like rock flour. They are largely ineffective at stopping dissolved chemicals. If this quarry uses a soluble chemical binder or wetting agent, standard stormwater ponds will not prevent those toxic components from entering our local groundwater during a significant storm event.

⚔️ How We Fight Back on FM 3509
Because the proposed site sits on Hoover Valley Road (FM 3509), the operator cannot hide entirely behind the state’s hands-off framework. They must answer to the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance. Unlike the state, the LCRA does require explicit submission and approval of quarry and mine watershed management plans — covering runoff, pollution, and water management — before construction permits are fully cleared.
This means our most direct path to viewing their actual drainage maps, engineering designs, and chemical mitigation plans is through targeted public information requests directly to the LCRA, or by tracking the public filing of their TCEQ Notice of Intent (NOI) through the STEERS system.

✅ The Clear Alternative: The Dry Plant
Whether it is hidden chemical additives or “shadow” stormwater plans, the traditional wet quarry model relies entirely on self-regulation and a lack of transparency. This is exactly why we continue to push for implementation of best-practice methods such as the “Dry Plant” vacuum and baghouse filtration alternative. By eliminating the water spray entirely, a facility completely eliminates the need for massive industrial groundwater pumping and removes the threat of unmonitored chemical runoff entering our water supply. A baghouse system captures dust mechanically — cleaner, more efficient, and fully accountable. A better solution exists. CPI has simply chosen not to use it.

📋 Where We Stand
✅ Formal letter submitted to TPWD Executive Director David Yoskowitz, Ph.D.
✅ Copies transmitted to State Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores
✅ Burnet County Commissioners Court resolution on record opposing new industrial groundwater permits
✅ SaveBurnet.com representative attended TPWD Commission Public Meeting — May 28, 2026
⏳ Awaiting TPWD response and formal permit stay
📣 Public information requests sent to TCEQ & LCRA

We have the facts, we have the evidence, and we have the will to keep fighting. We will not let our water be wasted or chemically degraded while a better solution exists.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Vigilant.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

The picture below is compliments of "Stop 3009 Vulcan Quarry"
A resident near the Anderson Columbia quarry in New Braunfels observed a thick, chalky liquid flowing across his property and farm—apparently coming from a quarry tailing pond breach.
We don't want this to happen in Burnet County!

update 96 - a national warning sign: when the water is gone, it's gone

This aerial drone photograph captures the dramatic emergence of large islands and vast, dried-out stretches of Canyon Lake that are normally deep underwater. It provides an excellent, high-level perspective of the sheer volume of water missing from the reservoir during the height of the regional drought.

Update #96: A National Warning Sign: When the Water Is Gone, It’s Gone

5/22/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,
Dear Followers,
Last week we submitted our formal letter to Texas Parks and Wildlife. This week, we want to zoom out — because what is happening to groundwater across America is not just a warning. It is a roadmap of exactly where Burnet County is headed if we allow industrial-level pumping to go unchecked.

A major national report published this week confirms what we have been saying all along: new groundwater regulations are being forced upon states that waited too long to act. From California’s San Joaquin Valley to Arizona’s unregulated plains to the Mississippi Delta, the story is the same — communities that allowed industrial over-pumping without proper studies are now paying a devastating price.

ACTION ALERT — TPWD Public Meeting Next Week!

We have an important and time-sensitive opportunity. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission is holding an official public meeting next week in Austin, and SaveBurnet.com will have a representative present to hand out materials and speak directly on behalf of our community.

  TPWD Commission Public Meeting
  When:  Thursday, May 28, 2026 at 9:00 AM
  Where:  TPWD Austin Headquarters, Commission Hearing Room
                      4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744

Our representative will be formally requesting that the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission issue a stay on all permits associated with the proposed rock quarry on FM 3509 until a full environmental analysis and geological impact report have been completed. This is exactly the kind of official forum where our voice carries legal and procedural weight — and we intend to use it.

Our formal letter, already delivered to TPWD Executive Director Dr. David Yoskowitz, and copied to State Representative Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores, documents the structural risks to Longhorn Cavern State Park, the safety of visitors and youth at Camp Longhorn, and the groundwater threats to our community. That letter will serve as the foundation of our remarks at the May 28th hearing.

If you are able to attend in person, please wear your Green SaveBurnet T-shirt. Your presence — even in silence — sends a powerful message to the Commission. If you cannot attend, rest assured that your voice is already on record through the thousands of signatures, letters, and resolutions that have been submitted on behalf of this community.

What Is Happening Across the Nation

California — Farmers Forced to Remove Their Own Orchards
Under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), farmers in the San Joaquin Valley are now being limited to 1.6 acre-feet of groundwater per acre — while almond orchards alone require 3 to 4 acre-feet of water to survive. The result? Farmers are tearing out productive orchards, fallowing land, and absorbing heavy financial penalties for excess pumping. Experts warn that up to 20% of the San Joaquin Valley’s farmland could be taken out of production by 2040 because aquifers were over-tapped for decades without restraint.

The Lesson for Burnet County: Once an aquifer is depleted, no law can bring it back. The time to act is before the industrial pumps go in — not after your neighbor’s well runs dry.

Arizona — Writing the Rules After the Damage Is Done
In areas of Arizona where groundwater is completely unregulated, any landowner who can afford a drill rig can pump as much as they want, as deep as they want, with no reporting required. The state is now scrambling to establish Active Management Areas and emergency restrictions — but only after the water table has already fallen to crisis levels in multiple regions.

The Lesson for Burnet County: Texas currently has some of the weakest groundwater protections in the nation. The “rule of capture” still allows industrial operators to pump without limit. Asphalt Inc. and Construction Partners Inc. are counting on that.

Multi-State Crisis — The Regulatory Domino Effect
A new national analysis confirms that as of 2026, states across the country are in various stages of groundwater crisis management — with 25% of sustainability plans still under review, 10% requiring revision, and 3% already under direct state intervention. The Texas-New Mexico Rio Grande settlement reached last year now requires New Mexico to forfeit approximately 5.9 billion gallons of groundwater annually to ensure Texas receives its legal allocation. These are no longer theoretical risks. They are enforceable legal realities reshaping entire economies.

The Lesson for Burnet County: Interstate water conflicts are already costing states hundreds of millions of dollars in legal fees and lost productivity. Our aquifer, once depleted, becomes everyone’s problem — and everyone’s expense.

What This Means Right Here on FM 3509
The proposed rock crushing plant by Asphalt Inc. (owned by Alabama-based Construction Partners Inc.) would require industrial-level groundwater pumping for dust suppression and processing operations. This is not a family farm drawing a modest share of the aquifer. This is heavy industry, operating daily, for potentially 20 to 50 years, pulling water from the same aquifer that feeds your wells, your livestock, and your community.

The Burnet County Commissioners Court saw this coming. On January 13, 2026, they unanimously passed a resolution opposing any new groundwater permits until proper studies are completed. That bipartisan stand was a bold and correct call. We must make sure it holds.

Where We Stand:
Formal letter submitted to TPWD Executive Director David Yoskowitz, Ph.D.
Copies transmitted to State Rep. Ellen Troxclair and Senator Pete Flores
Burnet County Commissioners Court resolution on record opposing new industrial groundwater permits
SaveBurnet.com representative attending TPWD Commission Public Meeting — May 28, 2026
Awaiting TPWD response and formal permit stay

Read More
•   New Groundwater Regulations Reshape Farm Operations — Farm Progress
•   Groundwater Law Begins Reshaping the Valley — The Sun-Gazette

    We are not just fighting for today. We are fighting for every family, every farm,
  and every future generation that depends on this water.
  Stay loud. Stay united.


The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 95 - The proposed quarry affect on Longhorn Cavern State Park

5/15/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

Dear Followers,
We are pleased to share that our formal request to halt permitting for the proposed FM 3509 rock crushing plant has officially been submitted to the Executive Director and leadership team at the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).

This comprehensive letter details the critical structural risks to Longhorn Cavern State Park, groundwater disruption threats matching the Burnet County Commissioners Court resolution, and urgent safety concerns for visitors and the youth at Camp Longhorn. We have also formally copied State Representative Ellen Troxclair and State Senator Pete Flores to ensure our legislative leaders are fully engaged in protecting our community.

The full text of the letter is included below for your review. You can also download a printable PDF copy of the official document that was transmitted to state officials directly from our website:  [Click Here then scroll down to Download the formal TPWD Letter]

Thank you for your continued dedication to protecting the natural resources, safety, and heritage of Burnet County.
  Below - Letter that was sent to TPWD
May 13, 2026

TO:   David Yoskowitz, Ph.D., Executive Director
          Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
          4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744

RE:  Formal Request to Halt Permitting — Proposed Rock Crushing Plant on FM 3509,
          Burnet County, Texas — Threat to Longhorn Cavern State Park and Public Safety

The proposed rock crushing plant on FM 3509 will be owned by Construction Partners Inc. (an Alabama-based, publicly traded company) through its subsidiary Asphalt Inc. This proposed quarry has become a major point of contention in Burnet County since late 2024. The site’s proximity to Longhorn Cavern State Park — less than three miles away — has raised specific alarms regarding both the structural integrity of the cavern and the safety of the thousands of visitors inside it each year. Camp Longhorn (a prominent youth summer camp that has served the community since the 1950s) has also raised urgent concerns about the safety of thousands of youth campers who are outdoors, adjacent to the quarry, during blasting operations.

Longhorn Cavern State Park is a Texas State Park managed by TPWD and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Developed by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) during the 1930s, it has served as a landmark of the Texas Hill Country for nearly a century. Under Texas Parks and Wildlife Code §13.101, TPWD has the authority and obligation to protect state park resources from activities that pose a threat to their physical integrity. This letter formally requests that TPWD exercise that authority immediately.

Below is an analysis of the risks, followed by a formal list of required environmental studies and a request to halt all permitting pending their completion.

1.  Structural Risks to Longhorn Cavern State Park
While industrial blasting is regulated, the karst limestone of Central Texas presents unique risks that standard industrial impact models do not adequately address:

•         Vibration Transmission: Blasting creates seismic waves that travel efficiently through dense limestone. At less than three miles, catastrophic structural collapse is unlikely under standard mining models; however, cosmetic damage — cracking of delicate speleothems (stalactites, stalagmites, and flowstones, some thousands of years old) — and the loosening of “key blocks” in the cave ceiling are serious concerns that must be addressed before operations begin.

•         Fracture Propagation: This region is a network of interconnected sinkholes and caves. Repetitive blasting can cause existing fractures to expand or shift, potentially altering the natural drainage of the cavern system or opening new conduits for silt and surface runoff to enter — irreversibly degrading water quality and cave ecology.

•         Groundwater Disruption: On January 13, 2026, the Burnet County Commissioners Court unanimously passed a resolution formally opposing any new groundwater permits — temporary or permanent — until a thorough study is presented to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District. The resolution specifically targets high-volume industrial uses such as the proposed FM 3509 rock crusher and demands public environmental and hydrological impact studies to ensure no risk to domestic wells, natural resources, or the long-term sustainability of the Burnet County Aquifers. This unanimous, bipartisan action by the county’s governing body represents the expressed will of the local community and must be given full deference in TPWD’s review.

2.  Safety of Visitors and Children Inside the Cavern
Longhorn Cavern State Park hosts guided tours year-round, welcoming thousands of visitors annually — a substantial portion of whom are children. Whether it is safe to have visitors inside the cavern during nearby blasting operations involves three critical factors:

•         The “Startle” Factor: Even if a blast is not strong enough to damage cave structures, the audible concussive thump and vibration felt through the floor can trigger panic, trips, and falls in a confined, dark, subterranean environment — causing injury to tour groups, particularly children, the elderly, and visitors with sensory sensitivities.

•         Toxic Fumes and Air Quality: Blasting produces gases including nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO). While these typically dissipate in open air, they can travel through underground fissures and accumulate in “dead air” pockets in connected cave systems. Given the known geological connectivity of this karst region, this risk must be assessed by qualified specialists before blasting commences.

•         Particulate Matter and Respiratory Health: Beyond blasting, the rock crushing process generates significant fine dust. Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10) can infiltrate the cave atmosphere, permanently coating irreplaceable formations and harming troglodytic (cave-dwelling) species — as well as the respiratory health of visitors and park staff.

3.  Safety of Youth at Camp Longhorn
Camp Longhorn has operated on the shores of Inks Lake, adjacent to the proposed quarry corridor, since the 1950s and serves hundreds of children each summer. Unlike schoolchildren who spend their days under HVAC-filtered air, Camp Longhorn campers live, sleep, eat, and participate in all activities entirely outdoors — 24 hours a day, 7 days a week during the camp season. The cumulative daily effects of blasting vibrations, toxic fume releases, and fine particulate dust on these children represent a serious and unaddressed public health concern that has not been accounted for in any permitting documentation reviewed to date.

4.  Required Environmental and Geological Studies
Standard industrial impact studies routinely underestimate the fragility of karst landscapes and the unique vulnerabilities of active show caves. The following specialized studies are essential and must be completed, independently peer-reviewed, and made available for public comment before any permits are issued or ground disturbance is permitted:

4a.  Seismic Propagation & Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) Modeling
•         Site-Specific Attenuation Study: Determination of how vibration travels through this specific limestone shelf, accounting for potential wave amplification upon striking cave walls.

•         PPV Safety Limits: Establishment of a site-specific ceiling. While 2.0 in/sec may be acceptable for surface structures, cave protection may require limits as low as 0.05 to 0.1 in/sec to protect delicate formations and unstable ceiling blocks.

4b.  High-Resolution Fracture Mapping
•         Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT): Mapping of underground voids and fractures between the plant site and the cavern to identify hidden conduits that could transmit blasting energy directly into the cave system.

•         Borehole Camera Inspections: High-definition imaging of rock strata to identify key blocks in the cave ceiling most vulnerable to dislodgement under repetitive vibration.

4c.  Karst Hydrogeology & Dye Tracing
•         Dye Trace Analysis: Biodegradable dye injection at the proposed plant site to establish whether surface spills or runoff from plant operations would travel through the karst aquifer and emerge inside the cavern or contaminate its water features.

•         Water Table Drawdown Study: Assessment of whether groundwater pumping for dust suppression could destabilize underground voids and trigger sinkhole collapses — a known consequence of dewatering karst terrain.

4d.  Continuous Microseismic Monitoring Program
•         Geophone Installation: Seismic sensors placed inside the cavern and at the park boundary to establish a pre-construction baseline and monitor vibration in real time.

•         Automatic Alert System: A real-time notification system that immediately alerts park rangers and the plant operator if a blast exceeds agreed-upon safety thresholds, enabling immediate cave evacuation if necessary.

4e.  Air Quality & “Cave Breathing” Analysis
•         Particulate Infiltration Study: Analysis of how fine rock dust (PM 2.5 and PM 10) from the crusher may be drawn into the cavern’s atmosphere, damaging formations and impairing the respiratory health of visitors and park staff.

•         Toxic Gas Dispersion Modeling: Atmospheric modeling to determine whether blasting gases (NO₂, CO) could migrate through surface cracks or karst conduits into the cave under specific meteorological or pressure conditions.

4f.  Cumulative Long-Term Impact Assessment
A single-event blast study is insufficient. A multi-year cumulative impact model must be performed to assess the effects of daily blasting over the anticipated operational life of the quarry (typically 20–50 years). Cumulative micro-fracturing can reach a geological tipping point years after operations begin. This long-term risk must be formally assessed and disclosed before any permits are granted.

5.  Legal and Regulatory Basis for a Permit Stay
•         Texas Parks and Wildlife Code §13.101: Authorizes TPWD to take measures necessary to protect state park resources from physical damage or destruction.

•         Texas Health and Safety Code §382 (Texas Clean Air Act): Requires TCEQ review of air quality impacts from industrial operations; TPWD should formally request TCEQ coordination given the proximity to a public-use state park.

•         National Register of Historic Places (36 CFR Part 800): As a listed property, Longhorn Cavern is entitled to Section 106 consultation review under the National Historic Preservation Act for any undertaking with a federal nexus. TPWD should determine whether any federal permitting or funding is involved and trigger this review accordingly.

•         Burnet County Commissioners Court Resolution (January 13, 2026): The unanimous resolution formally opposing new groundwater permits until thorough studies are completed represents the expressed will of the local governing body and must be given full deference in TPWD’s review process.

6.  Formal Request to TPWD
We formally request that TPWD stay the issuance of any further permits or authorizations related to the proposed FM 3509 rock crushing plant until all four of the following conditions are satisfied:

•         Condition 1: All geological, hydrological, seismic, and air quality studies enumerated in Section 4 have been completed by qualified, independent experts.

•         Condition 2: All completed studies have been independently peer-reviewed and made available for a minimum 60-day public comment period.

•         Condition 3: TPWD, in coordination with TCEQ and the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District, has formally determined that Longhorn Cavern State Park, its visitors, Camp Longhorn, and the surrounding community will suffer no adverse impacts from the proposed operations.

•         Condition 4: A comprehensive, enforceable precautionary safety plan — including real-time monitoring, automatic blast-suspension protocols, and defined remediation obligations — has been accepted by TPWD in writing before any ground disturbance is permitted.

We further request that TPWD formally notify the TCEQ, the LCRA, and the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District of this request and ask each agency to similarly stay the issuance of any permits or authorizations for this project pending completion of the above.

The safety of children touring a confined underground cave, the irreplaceable geological heritage of Longhorn Cavern State Park, the health of hundreds of youth campers at Camp Longhorn, and the long-term water security of Burnet County must take absolute priority over the commercial interests of an out-of-state company seeking to industrialize this geologically sensitive corridor.

Respectfully submitted,
Randy Printz
On behalf of SaveBurnet.com

SaveBurnet.com | Burnet County, Texas

cc:
Rodney Franklin, Director, State Parks Division — Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
Representative Ellen Troxclair, Texas House of Representatives, District 19
Senator Pete Flores, Texas Senate, District 24

Copies transmitted to the above legislative representatives to ensure full awareness of this matter and to request their active support in protecting the constituents and natural resources of Burnet County.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 94 - a texas-wide warning: what happens when the water runs dry?

Public Questions & Answers at the May 5th Strategy Session

Pictured above, members of the community take part in the lively Q&A session during our May 5th meeting at the AgriLife Center. Guest Speaker Craig Clark is joined on stage by the SaveBurnet.com technical consultants and committee members. We would like to thank everyone who stepped up to the microphone to ask insightful questions and express their views. It is this shared dedication that keeps our movement an immovable force.

5/8/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

A Record-Breaking Night for Our Community
Before we dive into state-wide news, we want to express our incredible gratitude for the turnout at our May 5th strategy session at the AgriLife Center. The room was packed to capacity, proving once again that when it comes to our water, this community stands as an immovable wall.

We were honored to have Craig Clark as our guest speaker, whose expertise on water board management provided invaluable insights. We also want to thank the distinguished representatives and officials who attended to hear our concerns, including representatives from Representative Ellen Troxclair’s office, Senator Pete Flores’ office, Judge Bryan Wilson, Commissioner Jim Luther, and many others.

A very special thank you to Camp Longhorn for providing the food and Chicken Express for donating the water. To everyone who attended and donated to our legal and scientific fight—thank you. Your support is the fuel that keeps this movement moving forward.

A Texas-Wide Warning:
What Happens When the Water Runs Dry?

The Texas-Wide Warning
As we continue our fight to protect the aquifers in Burnet County, it is critical to look beyond our own fence lines. Across the state, cities that once thought their water supply was "guaranteed" are now facing a grim reality.

Financial Fallout: The Corpus Christi & Beeville Crisis
Major credit rating agencies have recently flagged Corpus Christi’s credit rating due specifically to a looming water crisis. In Beeville, the city had to take on $35 million in debt—roughly $2,600 per resident—just to fund emergency groundwater desalination.

The Lesson: When a city loses water security, it loses financial stability. These infrastructure costs are passed directly to you through higher utility bills.

The $225 Million "Deep Dive" in Williamson County
The Brushy Creek Regional Utility Authority (BCRUA) has been forced to spend $225 million to build tunnels 300 feet under Lake Travis because previous pump stations were "bottoming out."

The Lesson: "Deep-water" fixes are reactive and incredibly expensive. We must be proactive in protecting our aquifers now.

Industrial Demand vs. Community Needs
In towns like Ingleside and Aransas Pass, disaster declarations are being issued because industrial demand—where a single plant can use more water than 300,000 residents—is exceeding supply. Furthermore, industrial plants across Texas currently have rights to billions of gallons of groundwater for free, with no requirement to return it to the public.

Physical & Legal Depletion

Land Subsidence: Excessive pumping in areas like Conroe has caused the land to sink by up to 4.2 feet. Over-tapping aquifers causes permanent physical damage to our environment.
The "Data" Trap: In North Texas, proposed cuts recently threatened to reduce local water allocations by 90% based on faulty modeling. We must ensure our local officials have the right facts to protect your private wells.

Watch & Learn: The Reality of the Texas Water Crisis

What This Means for Burnet County
Water is our most valuable asset. Whether it is the $270,000 emergency infrastructure bill the City of Burnet recently faced or the mandatory Stage 3 restrictions currently in place, the crisis is here. By opposing massive industrial water demands, we are preventing Burnet County from becoming the next headline.
Stronger Together
We are the last line of defense for our water, our air, and our land. Let the momentum from the May 5th meeting carry us forward.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Help us fight this industrial expansion from an out-of-state company. Your donations fund the experts and legal counsel needed to hold these agencies and corporations accountable.

update 93 - Standing Tall for our water and our land

Pictured Above Old Castle / Knife River Abandoned Quarry:
Abandoned quarries create a cascading series of ecological and physical failures that extend far beyond the property lines of the mining site. When a quarry is left without proper reclamation—such as soil stabilization, grading, and revegetation—it effectively becomes an active erosion machine that permanently alters the surrounding watershed.

Update #93: Standing Tall for Our Water and Our Land

5/1/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

We are at a critical juncture in our fight to protect the Texas Hill Country. As we prepare for our next major community gathering, we are also reaching out to support our neighbors in a shared battle to preserve the integrity of Burnet County.

Join Us: Community Strategy Meeting
Our next public meeting is just around the corner. We need every voice in the room as we confront the escalating threats to our natural resources and the regulatory failures that allow them to persist.

When: Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Time: Doors open at 5:30 PM | Meeting starts at 6:00 PM
Where: Burnet County AgriLife Center (607 N Vandeveer St, Burnet, TX)

Featured Speaker: Craig Clark We are honored to host Craig Clark, a Burnet County ranch owner and Texas A&M Distinguished Graduate in Mechanical & Petroleum Engineering. With 50 years of experience in the oil and gas industry and a background as a former Water Board Director, Mr. Clark will provide a professional assessment of the projected 130-foot drop in the water table facing our local aquifers.

Meeting Agenda Highlights:

Progress Report: Updates on our technical monitoring, legal strategies, and legislative efforts.
Expert Presentation: Craig Clark on sub-surface technology and specific risks to our water.
Public Q&A: Your chance to ask questions and learn how to take action.

Support Our Coalition: Protest the 765 kV Power Lines
SaveBurnet.com stands in solidarity with our sister groups working to stop the 765 kV power lines from crossing Burnet County. These massive lines threaten our property values, health, and local wildlife. We encourage all our followers to file an official protest online.

How to Help (Docket Control Number: 59475):

Watch the Guide: View the "How to File a Protest" video at vimeo.com/1125636396.
Draft Your Letter First: The website times out in 20 minutes. Write your letter in a separate document first, citing concerns like lowered property values, health effects from electromagnetic fields, or damage to wildlife.
File Online: Go to interchange.puc.texas.gov/filer.
Submit: Enter Docket 59475, fill in your info, and upload your letter as a "Protest".

Detailed, step-by-step instructions and letter templates are available on our website by CLICKING HERE. Scroll down to access the file.

Stronger Together
Our mission is most effective when we act as a unified team. Whether we are fighting a rock crusher that threatens our water or power lines that threaten our land, we support every endeavor that protects the citizens and heritage of Burnet County. When state agencies fail to uphold their mission, the community must lead. We are an immovable force when we act as one!

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 92 - A Mission Abandoned? the data behind tCEq's failure

4/24/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

Our fight against the Asphalt Inc. LLC rock crusher is about more than just one company—it is about a state regulatory system that is increasingly failing to uphold its own mission. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) claims its goal is to "protect our state's public health and natural resources," yet recent investigative data reveals a disturbing pattern of neglect and "rubber-stamping" industrial expansion at the expense of Texans.

The TCEQ Failure by the Numbers
New reports based on the agency’s own data show that the TCEQ has become a "reluctant regulator," allowing industrial operations to proceed even when they pose clear environmental risks:

Enforcement Backlog: The TCEQ began the year with a backlog of over 1,400 enforcement cases. At the current rate of resolution, it would take 35 years to clear existing cases—even if no new polluters were added to the list.
Declining Investigations: In the 2025 fiscal year, the agency conducted the fewest on-site investigations in eight years, a drop of over 5,000 investigations compared to just two years ago.
Ignoring the Public: In 2025, TCEQ commissioners denied 40% of all requests for Contested Case Hearings, even when their own internal Office of Public Interest Counsel (OPIC) recommended the hearings be granted to protect the public.
The "Polluter's Playbook": Over a six-year period, companies in Texas had 21,000 unexpected pollution releases, yet the TCEQ took formal action to find the root cause in less than 1% of those cases.

The full article of the Austin American Statesman is posted on the SaveBurnet website and can be accessed by CLICKING HERE.

The Corporate Giant: CPI & Asphalt Inc.
It is important to understand who we are up against. Asphalt Inc. LLC is owned by Construction Partners, Inc. (CPI), a massive out-of-state corporation. Since acquiring Asphalt Inc., CPI has used its industrial weight to push projects that threaten the Texas environment. This is a classic case of a large, out-of-state corporation prioritizing profits over the local water resources and air quality that our community relies on.

What This Means for Burnet County
For us, this isn't just a statistic; it’s our reality. When a corporation like CPI steps into our backyard, they enter a system where public participation is often treated as a "bureaucratic box" to check. TCEQ is failing its mission, making our collective watchfulness more important than ever. Additional data and related information are available at SaveBurnet.com.

Join Us: Next Community Meeting
We must continue to pull together to provide the oversight that the state is failing to provide. Please join us for our next strategy session.

When: Monday, May 5th
Time: Doors open at 5:30 PM | Meeting starts at 6:00 PM | Concludes at 7:00 PM
Where: AgriLife Center, Burnet, Texas
Guest Speaker: Craig Clark

About our Speaker:
Craig Clark and his wife, Donna, have owned a ranch in Burnet County since the late 1990s. Mr. Clark is a graduate of Texas A&M in Mechanical & Petroleum Engineering and was recently inducted into the Texas A&M Engineering Academy of Distinguished Graduates. He recently retired after 50 years in the oil and gas industry, including service as Chairman/CEO of large-cap NYSE-listed companies.
Crucially, Mr. Clark also served two terms as an elected official in Harris County as a Water Board Director for Municipal Utility Districts in the greater Houston area. He will be sharing his personal experience living next to a quarry and his professional opinion on the specific impacts this project will have on our Burnet County aquifers.

Stronger Together
We are the last line of defense for our water, our air, and our land. When the agencies meant to protect us fail, the community must lead. We are an immovable force when we act as one.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 91 - The $1 Billion Threat – Mapping the Impact on Our Community

4/17/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

As we continue to peel back the layers of the documents submitted by Asphalt Inc. LLC, the "mathematical reality" of this project is becoming clearer—and more concerning. We have completed a deep-dive analysis of the local property data to understand exactly what is at stake for our neighbors.

📉 The 130-Foot Drop: A Direct Hit to Your Water
The Hydrology reports from Westward Engineering project that even under optimal (non-drought) conditions, the aquifer will drop by approximately 130 feet for all affected well owners within a 2-mile radius. This represents a staggering financial and operational impact on the families and ranchers surrounding the Hoover Valley Road site.

🗺️ The 5-Mile Impact Zone: $1 Billion at Risk
The negative impact of industrial-level pumping, combined with inevitable dust and air pollution, does not stop at the property line. Property values will be affected even 5 to 10 miles away. Our analysis of the 5-mile radius around the proposed site reveals:

Total Market Value: Over $1 Billion in property value is currently at risk.
Properties Affected: 1,953 unique property IDs identified.
Unique Owners Affected: 1,542 individuals or entities.

This data highlights a massive density of residential and private land, reinforcing that this is not just a "neighbor" issue—it is a county-wide crisis.

🔍 Summary of Affected Properties
Our analysis of the Burnet Central Appraisal District data identifies who is most exposed across three categories:
1. Top Landowners (Acreage Stakeholders)

KMC Finance LLC: ~2,393 acres
Capital Land Investments: ~1,708 acres
Ebeling Family Trust: ~1,274 acres
Phillips Sam & Sons Inc: ~964 acres
Burnet County: ~866 acres (Public land/Infrastructure)
Buckner International: ~827 acres
Camp Longhorn Capital Inc: ~428 acres (Critical youth camp proximity)

2. Significant Financial Stakeholders (Appraised Value)

City of Burnet & Burnet County: Over $30 million combined.
Buckner International: ~$16.1 million.
LCRA: ~$4.6 million.
Private Families (Wortham, Young, Cotner, Cox): Properties valued between $3.5M and $4.5M each.

3. Most Active Owners (Parcel Count)

Austerra Stable Growth Fund LP: 30 parcels
Burnet City of: 23 parcels
Burnet Sunday Dr LLC: 21 parcels
Camp Longhorn Capital Inc: 7 parcels
Printzipal LLC: 6 parcels

📂 Access the Raw Data
We believe in full transparency. You can now access the raw data from the Burnet Central Appraisal District on our website.
[CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE DATA]

The Excel file includes three tabs for your review:

Alphabetical: Sorted by Property Owner/Filed Name.
Market Value: Ranked from Largest to Smallest.
Acreage: Ranked by Parcel Size from Largest to Smallest.

If you have trouble with the Excel file, we have also provided PDF versions for each of these three categories for easier viewing.

🛡️ Standing Strong Together
Our strength has always been in our numbers. An out-of-state company may have deep pockets, but they do not have the heart and history of the people who call this land home. When we pull together as one group, armed with facts and a shared vision for our future, we are an immovable force. We are fighting for our water, our air, and the heritage of Burnet County.

Stay Engaged. Stay Informed. Stay Together.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Access 5-mile radius information

update 90 - New Critical Data – Exposing the Flaws in the Industrial Pumping Plan

4/10/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

First and foremost, we want to extend a heartfelt THANK YOU to every one of you for your continued dedication. This movement remains strong because of your voices, your data, and your unwavering commitment to protecting our home.

📂 Website Updated: New Reference Materials
We have updated our website with two critical new documents that form the basis of our current legal and technical battle. You can find them under:
Reference Material > Water Related Info > CTGCD Related Information
The new documents are:

Asphalt Inc. Burnet Quarry Hydrogeologic Report
Westward Engineering’s Response to INTERA’s Request for Additional Information

🔍 Initial Analysis: Flaws and Inaccuracies
While our team of experts is currently conducting a deep-dive analysis into these files, our initial review has already uncovered significant red flags.
We are encouraged to see that INTERA (the third-party consultant hired by the Groundwater District) is asking exactly the right questions. They are pinpointing the gaps in the data that CPI / Asphalt Inc. is trying to push through. However, the responses provided by Westward Engineering are, in our view, filled with flaws and inaccuracies.

Why this matters to YOU:

Misleading Models: The responses appear to downplay the true extent of the "cone of depression" that will be created by pumping over 200,000 gallons per day.
Neighboring Well Risk: The data confirms that industrial pumping at these levels will have a major impact—both environmentally and economically—on the citizens of Burnet County.
Aquifer Integrity: We believe the report fails to adequately address the long-term depletion of our shared aquifers, focusing instead on short-term gains for an out-of-state corporation.

🛡️ Our Next Steps
We will be covering these documents in great detail in future updates and at our upcoming public meetings. These reports are the "smoking gun" that shows just how damaging this industrial footprint will be for the wells on the proposed site and for every surrounding property owner.
Please take a moment to look at these documents on the website. Understanding the technical side of this fight is how we hold our officials accountable and ensure that "science" isn't used to mask corporate greed.

🌟 The Power of Transparency
The truth has a way of coming to the surface. By demanding transparency and pointing out these scientific flaws, we are making it impossible for this project to move forward in the shadows. We are standing up for the water that sustains our families and the economic future of our county. When we fight with facts and unity, we are an immovable force.

Stay Engaged. Stay Informed. Stay Hopeful.

The SaveBurnet.com Team:
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Click Here to DONATE TO THE LEGAL & SCIENTIFIC FIGHT Your contributions directly fund our independent data analysis and legal research.

update 89 - Meeting schedule change and the mathematical reality of our water

4/3/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

We are moving forward with our mission to protect Burnet County’s resources through data and community action. This update contains an important scheduling announcement and a deep dive into the true scale of the industrial water threat we are facing.

📅 Important Meeting Announcement
Please take note of the following change to our public schedule:

Meeting Postponed: The SaveBurnet.com public meeting originally scheduled for April 15th has been postponed and will not take place.
Next Steps: We are currently working on a revised schedule. We will confirm the next meeting’s time and place in a future update.
Stay Informed: Please continue to check our website, as it will be updated with the correct meeting information as soon as it is finalized.

Many of you have asked about the total amount of water that the proposed Rock Quarry will use. Previously we have provided calculations for dust abatement, but not for ancillary water usage such as spraying the roads and washing the tucks. Below is a summary of the presentation that is now posted on our SaveBurnet.com website. To access the presentation, click the green button at the bottom of this update.

💧 The Anatomy of the Drain: Industrial Water Reality
We have completed a comprehensive audit of the proposed 14-hour, 7-day-a-week operations for the Asphalt Inc. rock quarry. The findings represent a precise, undeniable mathematical reality rather than a vague environmental concern.
There are two primary "water sinks" that will drain our local groundwater reserves:

1. The Plant (EPNs)
Emission Point Numbers (EPNs) are dictated by TCEQ air quality permits for equipment like primary crushers, shaker screens, and conveyor transfer points.

Mechanism: Continuous localized water spray is used to suppress airborne particulate matter during rock processing.
Hourly Rate: 1,860 to 29,700 Gallons per Hour (gal/hr).
The Extended Shift: For a 14-hour operation, this equates to 22,320 to 415,800 gallons per day.

2. The Perimeter (Haul Roads)
This involves approximately 350-acre unpaved internal road network on the site.

Mechanism: 4,000-gallon water trucks make continuous passes to soak road surfaces, binding dust under heavy truck traffic and combating severe Texas evaporation.
Hourly Rate: 4,000 to 12,000 Gallons per Hour (gal/hr).
The Extended Shift: For a 14-hour operation, this equates to 144,000 to 168,000 gallons per day.

📉 The Ultimate Drain: Staggering Totals
When these two sinks are combined under the proposed aggressive 14-hour daily schedule, the total combined usage reaches critical territory:

Total Combined Usage: 166,320 to 583,800 gallons per day.

This extraction footprint places a severe daily tax on local groundwater reserves, pushing our aquifer into a "0% Full" danger zone.

Industrial Water Extraction for Dust Control - Click here to access the presentation

🌟 A Message of Hope
While these numbers are staggering, they are the very tools we use to protect our future. Knowledge is power, and by exposing the "mathematical reality" of this project, we ensure that our leaders and neighbors cannot look away. Our community has always been defined by its resilience and its connection to this land. As we continue to refine our strategy and prepare for our next gathering, stay focused on the facts and the hope that comes from a community standing as one.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Engaged. Stay Informed.
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

DONATE TO THE LEGAL & SCIENTIFIC FIGHT Your contributions directly fund our independent data analysis and legal research.

update 88 - The Hays County warning: a glimpse into burnet's potential future

3/27/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

Burnet and Hays counties share a critical similarity: explosive population growth. According to 2026 data, both are among the top 25 fastest-growing counties in Texas, with Hays County ranked #9 and Burnet County ranked #25. Being in the top 25 fastest-growing counties is a strong indication of looming water issues due to rapidly increasing demand. Because of this shared trajectory, the severe groundwater crisis currently happening in Hays County shows exactly what Burnet will soon face if the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) grants Asphalt Inc. their requested permit.

🛡️ The CTGCD Mandate and Drought Reality
According to its charter, the mission of the CTGCD is clear: "The District will strive to develop, promote, and implement water conservation, augmentation, and management strategies to protect water resources for the benefit of the citizens, economy, and environment of Burnet County". In a stark reminder of the current strain on these resources, the CTGCD recently updated its website to announce an increase from Stage 2 to Stage 3 drought conditions.

⚠️ How the Hays Crisis Mirrors the Threat to Burnet
1. Depleted Aquifers and Dry Wells

The Hays Reality: 100% of the conservation district's monitored wells have fallen below historic levels. Wells that used to reliably hit water at 500 feet are now dropping to between 660 and 690 feet, forcing residents to constantly lower their pumps. Even worse, new wells are being dug into the confined Lower Trinity Aquifer—which has no ability to recharge. Once that water is gone, it is gone forever.
The Burnet Threat: Driven by the same rapid population growth as Hays, Burnet's aquifers are already under pressure. Asphalt Inc. (operating as Burnet Ranch Investments) has already drilled two industrial wells to depths of 755 to 780 feet and will be asking the CTGCD for permission to pump an industrial-level volume of over 300,000 gallons per day for mainly dust control. Pumping at this magnitude threatens to drastically draw down the local aquifer, effectively recreating Hays County's water scarcity in Burnet.

2. Crippling Financial Burdens on Homeowners

The Hays Reality: As wells go dry, residents are footing the bill. Lowering a pump costs around $1,500, and replacing one entirely costs about $7,500. Digging a brand new, deeper well can cost upwards of $75,000. Local well experts note that homeowners often have to refinance their houses just to afford water, adding, "You can't even sell your house if you don't have a reliable source of water".
The Burnet Threat: SaveBurnet.com has already submitted advanced analysis to the CTGCD demonstrating the severe drawdown effect Asphalt Inc.'s pumping had on neighboring wells. If the permit is approved, Burnet County residents could be forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars out-of-pocket to chase dropping water tables just to keep their homes habitable.

3. Deteriorating Water Quality and Mechanical Failures

The Hays Reality: The lower the water levels drop, the dirtier the water becomes. Low water levels increase the risk of hard minerals and dangerous bacteria, like E. coli. The mineral buildup also calcifies on pumps, causing premature mechanical failures.
The Burnet Threat: Draining the Burnet aquifers at industrial speeds will leave local residents with reduced water quality and vulnerable, easily damaged well equipment.

💡 The Solution: Technology Over Greed
Burnet County still has time to prevent this. To uphold its mandated mission, the CTGCD has two clear options:

Option 1: Mandate "Dry Systems" Technology: Rather than allowing Asphalt Inc. to drain the aquifer, the CTGCD can mandate the use of "Dry Systems" technology. This would require only 15,000 to 20,000 gallons a day, compared to the 300,000+ gallons currently requested.
Option 2: Deny the Permit in Totality: Given the area's limited water supply and Stage 3 drought conditions, the District can choose to deny the permit application in its entirety. A total denial would definitively protect neighboring residential wells from devastating drawdown effects.

🌟 A Message of Hope and Gratitude
We are at a crossroads, but we are not without a map. The awareness we are building today is the shield that protects our tomorrow. We want to express our deepest appreciation for the overwhelming support each of you has shown. Whether by attending meetings, sharing information, or contributing to the cause, you are the reason we have a fighting chance to preserve the heritage and resources of our beautiful Hill Country. Together, we can ensure that Burnet remains a place where our families—and our water—can thrive for generations to come.

Stay Engaged. Stay Informed. Stay Hopeful.

The SaveBurnet.com Team One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

Click Here to donate to our cause
Your contributions directly fund our independent monitoring and community education efforts.

update 87 - a powerhouse start - our march 18th inaugural meeting

3/20/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

We want to extend a massive THANK YOU to everyone who supported and attended our inaugural public meeting on March 18th.

Despite being in the middle of Spring Break, we had an incredible turnout of approximately 150 participants! Seeing that many neighbors take time away from their holiday to stand up for our water and land shows exactly why this community is a force to be reckoned with.

🏛️ Distinguished Support

We would like to extend a special thank you to Burnet County Judge Brian Wilson and County Commissioner of Precinct 1 Jim Luther for attending the meeting and providing their support. Having our county leadership stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the citizens sends a powerful message that the protection of Burnet County is a shared priority.

🎵 The Soundtrack of our Fight

A very special thank you goes out to Randy Wright and his wife, Cheryl, who were in attendance. Randy wrote and produced two incredible songs in support of the SaveBurnet.comeffort. These songs are available on our website—please Click Here to check them out! They are a great reminder of what we are fighting to protect.

🗣️ Voices of the Community: Your Impact

The Q&A session was the heart of the night. While we don't have the names of everyone who spoke, your contributions were invaluable. A few highlights that are already being put into action:

The Marble Falls Precedent: A follower suggested we look into the City of Marble Falls suing the TCEQ over air permits. We have already uncovered very useful information regarding this legal move. This was an extremely helpful lead—thank you!
Legislative Action: There was a great call for the committee to help draft "template letters" to our state legislators. We are working on these now to make it easier for every one of you to make your voice heard in Austin.
Engagement: Many of you asked how to get even more involved. Your energy is what keeps this movement growing!

🎓 Expert Insights & Guests

We were fortunate to have a panel of experts who did a phenomenal job fielding tough questions:

Fermin Ortiz: Provided essential context on Hill Country preservation.
Larry Black (Larry Black Law Firm): Answered complex legal questions regarding our standing and strategy.
Stacy Smith (Office of Rep. Ellen Troxclair): Relayed critical information on legislative efforts to protect our district.

We were also joined by Reno Lamb from the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD). Mr. Lamb was kind enough to field questions regarding the current drought status. He took the brunt of the community's frustration regarding why the CTGCD is asking residents to conserve water while simultaneously considering a massive industrial pumping permit. We thank Reno for his professional responses and for facing the community directly.

📊 Meeting Recap: The Core Issues

Though we started with a few technical "hiccups," we quickly made up time and covered our three primary pillars:

Air Quality: The status of the air permit and the reality of particulate pollution.
Water Runoff: The proven threat of silt and industrial contamination entering our Highland Lakes.
Groundwater Evaluation: An update on the CTGCD's "Availability Report" regarding Asphalt Inc.'s request to pump industrial levels of water from our aquifer.

🗓️ Mark Your Calendars: April 15th

Moving forward, our meetings will feature guest speakers on various conservation topics. To respect your time with your families, future meetings will be streamlined to approximately one hour.

WHEN: Wednesday, April 15th, 2026
TIME: 6:00 PM – 7:00 PM
WHERE: Burnet County AgriLife Extension Office
ADDRESS: 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611

🌟 A Message of Hope

When we pull together as a community, we aren't just a group of concerned citizens—we are a wall of resistance that cannot be ignored. Staying engaged, staying informed, and supporting one another is how we win this. We are stronger together, and the momentum from March 18th is only the beginning.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Engaged. See you April 15th.
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

To donate to our legal and scientific fight, please visit SaveBurnet.com and scroll down to "Donate to our cause."

update 86 - The Highland Lakes Crisis – Our Drinking Water Under Attack

3/6/26

As we march toward our critical public meeting on March 18th, a new and alarming report has surfaced that changes the stakes for everyone in the Hill Country. While we have been fighting to protect our groundwater from the massive industrial pumping of Asphalt Inc. / CPI, a new threat to our surface water has been confirmed by the state itself.
A recent TCEQ-backed analysis has identified the most polluted lakes in Texas—and the results are a gut-punch to our region.
3 of the Top 5 Most Polluted Lakes are OURSThe latest data reveals that three of the top five most polluted lakes in the entire state are part of the Highland Lakes chain. These aren't just recreational spots; they are the primary drinking water source for millions of people in Austin and across the Hill Country.

The News: You can read the full report here: TCEQ Releases New Data on the Most Polluted Lakes in Texas.
The Reality: Lakes Buchanan, Inks, and LBJ are under siege from rising bacteria levels, harmful algal blooms, and industrial runoff.
The Connection: These lakes are fed by the very same watersheds where Asphalt Inc. intends to place their 715-acre industrial footprint.

Profits Over People: The CPI Greed Factor
This fight is no longer just about a local quarry; it is about a massive, out-of-state corporation--Construction Partners Inc. (CPI)—prioritizing their bottom line over the well-being of Texas families. CPI and Asphalt Inc. are pushing for the cheapest, most destructive methods of operation because it pads their corporate profits in Alabama, while leaving the residents of the Texas Hill Country to deal with the permanent consequences of ruined aquifers and polluted lakes. We refuse to let corporate greed dictate the future of our water and our health.

Update #78 & The Threat to City of Burnet Drinking Water
As we highlighted in Update #78, the threat to our water isn't just theoretical—it is geographical. Approximately 50% of the drinking water for the City of Burnet is sourced from Devil's Cove on Inks Lake. When we look at the topography of the proposed Asphalt Inc. site, the danger becomes clear:

Devil's Backbone Cove: In a flood event, industrial contamination from the proposed quarry will flow directly into Spring Creek.
Contamination Path: Spring Creek feeds directly into Devil's Backbone Cove—the exact location where our city draws the water that goes into our homes, our schools, and our businesses.

Proven Flood Risks: Lessons from the July 2025 Presentation
In previous updates (Update #58 and Update #60), we discussed how the LCRA and TCEQ unfortunately issued permits to Asphalt Inc. despite these risks. The data from our July 2025 presentation provides undeniable proof of what happens when the Hill Country rains come:

Unstoppable Flooding: On July 4, 2025, rainfall at the proposed site was so intense it filled and overflowed a 20-acre-foot (6.5 million gallon) pond in just a few hours.
The Power of Water: The flow was powerful enough to uproot 30-foot Oak trees and top an 8-foot tall fence.
The "Slurry" Path through Peters Creek: Beyond Spring Creek, contaminated "slurry" will also flow into Peters Creek.
Impacting Our Youth & Wildlife: This runoff is projected to flow directly through the swimming pool at Camp Longhorn and continue downstream into the National Fish Hatchery on Lake LBJ.

If this quarry is built, we aren't just risking a "dusty site"—we are risking the poisoning of a youth camp, a federal hatchery, and the municipal drinking water for the City of Burnet.

Why "Best Practices" are No Longer Optional
This pollution data proves why our demand for Dry Vacuum (Baghouse) Systems and Paved Roads (as outlined in Update #85) is a matter of public health.

Zero Slurry Runoff: A "Dry Plant" configuration eliminates the "rock flour" slurry that would otherwise wash into our lakes during floods.
Protecting the LCRA Supply: By capping water use at 15,000–20,000 gallons per day, we prevent the massive industrial wastewater discharge that poisons our lakes.

Join the Fight on March 18th
We will be discussing what SaveBurnet.com has accomplished to date and what we are currently working on, which will include this new TCEQ data, our previous flood evidence, and the strategy to force "Best Practices" on out-of-state developers.

WHEN: Wednesday, March 18th, 2026
TIME: 6:00 PM
WHERE: Burnet County AgriLife Extension Office
ADDRESS: 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611

Can’t Make It?
If you are unable to attend in person, please consider visiting SaveBurnet.com/updates to stay current on our 86 milestones of resistance, and please consider donating to our cause. Every dollar helps us continue the legal and scientific fight to protect our home. To donate [Click Here], and then scroll down to "Donate to our cause."

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 85 - the "water myth"

2/27/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

As we prepare for our open public meeting on March 18th, we are armed with more than just passion—we are armed with data. Today, we are exposing the "Water Myth" being pushed by out-of-state industrial giants like Construction Partners Inc. (CPI) and their subsidiary, Asphalt Inc. / Lonestar Paving.
The industry will tell you they need hundreds of thousands of gallons of our groundwater every day to keep the dust down. The evidence shows they are wrong.

🛡️ The Best Practices Strategy: 20,000 Gallons vs. 300,000
By combining research from the Coalition for Responsible Environmental Aggregate Mining (CREAM) and the Texans for Responsible Aggregate Mining (TRAM), we have identified a clear "Best Practices" rulebook. If an Aggregate Production Operation (APO) actually follows the law and respects the community, they don't need to drain our aquifers.

The "Save Burnet" Best Practices Model:

Dry Vacuum (Baghouse) Systems: Instead of "soaking" the problem with water, these systems pull dust-laden air into a filtration unit, capturing 99.9% of harmful PM2.5 and PM10 particles.
Paving Entry & Exit Roads: TRAM and the TCEQ identify paving as a superior way to prevent "track-out." By paving internal high-traffic haul roads and the exit to Hoover Valley Road, the mechanical "grinding" of limestone into dust is eliminated.
Vacuum Sweeping: Once roads are paved, they can be cleaned with a vacuum street sweeper—using zero water—instead of being sprayed by a water truck 12 times a day.

The Math of Success: When these technologies are used together, the total water demand for a 200 TPH plant—including road maintenance, a 12–14 hour daily schedule, and the needs of 10–15 workers—drops to a range of approximately 15,000 to 20,000 gallons per day.

⚖️ Precedents for Protection: A Call to Our Officials
We are closely watching neighboring counties where the conversation around high-volume industrial water use is reaching a boiling point. While the legal road for local moratoriums is complex and currently being debated in courts and commissioners' rooms across the Hill Country, the core message remains the same: unfettered industrial pumping is a threat to our public safety.
It is insufficient and unfair to ask local families to observe strict water restrictions while allowing industrial developments to pump millions of gallons unchecked.

Our local officials have the responsibility to protect our water security as a matter of emergency management.
We must demand that the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) cap any industrial permit at the 15,000–20,000 gallons per day level that modern technology supports.

The logic is simple: If a quarry can operate safely and profitably on 15,000 gallons using best practices, then any request for more is an unnecessary waste of our community’s future for the sake of an Alabama corporation’s profit margin.

💧 Protecting the Hickory and Ellenburger-San Saba
Asphalt Inc. has already drilled into the Hickory Aquifer, and they are eyeing the Ellenburger-San Saba. These are not infinite resources; they are our lifeblood.

The CPI Plan: 300,000 Gallons/Day = 110 Million Gallons/Year (Traditional, Wasteful, Outdated).
The Save Burnet Plan: 20,000 Gallons/Day = ~7.3 Million Gallons/Year (Modern, Lawful, Accountable).

🗓️ Join Us on March 18th
We will be discussing what SaveBurnet.com has accomplished to date and what we are currently working on, which will include this "Best Practices" model in greater detail.

WHEN: Wednesday, March 18th, 2026
TIME: 6:00 PM
WHERE: Burnet County AgriLife Extension Office
ADDRESS: 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611

We want to thank CREAM (Facebook Page) and TRAM (Facebook Page) for their tireless work in providing the Texas community with the rulebook to fight back.

Can't make the meeting?
If you are unable to attend in person, please consider visiting SaveBurnet.com to stay updated and consider donating to our cause. Every contribution helps us continue the legal and scientific fight to protect our home.

We aren't just saying "No." We are saying "Follow the Law and Use the Technology." If they won't invest in the dry systems and paving that protect our water, they shouldn't be operating in our county.

Stay Hopeful. Stay Informed. See you March 18th.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 84 - profit over people? why an out-of-state corporation is eyeing 110 million gallons of our water

2/20/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

As we continue to dig deeper into the plans for the proposed rock-crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road (FM 3509), a disturbing picture is emerging. This isn't just about a local business; it’s about Construction Partners Inc. (CPI), a massive, out-of-state, publicly traded corporation that owns Asphalt Inc. LLC.

Why is a company from Alabama being allowed to potentially abuse and degrade the water supply of Burnet County just for the sake of profit?

💧 The 110 Million Gallon Question
Asphalt Inc. is currently preparing to request a permit for industrial groundwater pumping from the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD). They are expected to ask for over 300,000 gallons of our groundwater PER DAY.

🗓️ Monthly: That is nearly 10 Million gallons per month.
🗓️ Annually: Over 110 Million gallons of Burnet County water sprayed into the air just to try and control dust.

While SaveBurnet.com is not against economic growth, we are firmly against out-of-state interests taking advantage of Texas resources for the sake of greed and profit. 📉

✅ There is a Proven, Better Way: The "Dry Plant" Alternative
Asphalt Inc. will tell you that it needs this water for dust control. That is simply not true. Data from the Coalition for Responsible Environmental Aggregate Mining (CREAM) highlights that a quarry can be both profitable and environmentally friendly by using a Dry Vacuum Dust Control System. We want to thank CREAM for their incredible work and advocacy for the Texas community—you can find more of their research and work on their Facebook page.

*See table in attached image below*

🛠️ Turning Waste into Value: Reusing Dust Byproducts
One of the most significant advantages of a vacuum-based system is how it handles waste. In traditional wet systems, dust becomes a "sludge" or waste liability trapped in settling ponds. However, a dry vacuum system pulls that dust-laden air into a filtration unit (baghouse) and collects it as a fine, dry powder known as "rock flour."

Selling for Profit: This material is a valuable mineral filler that can be sold for use in asphalt and concrete mixes.
Superior Product: Because the vacuum removes the dusty coating from the larger stones, the resulting aggregate is cleaner and offers better adhesion for construction projects.

📖 Following the "Best Practices" Rulebook
The TCEQ RG-500 manual serves as the primary guidance document for protecting water quality in sensitive limestone (Karst) regions like ours.

Superior Standards: The manual recognizes that fabric filters (baghouses) are superior alternatives to water sprays for dust abatement.
Protecting the Aquifer: Because dry systems eliminate the "slurry" runoff common in wet plants, they are the preferred method for sites located over sensitive recharge zones.
Visible Emission Checks: These systems provide a more consistent way to meet strict "zero visible emissions" standards (Method 22) than water, which often fails during Texas heatwaves.

🚀 The Math for Our Future
If Asphalt Inc. deployed the same or similar technology used successfully at the KBDJ Quarry in Hays County:

📉 It could operate on only 10,000 to 40,000 gallons per day instead of 300,000.
🛡️ It would capture 99.9% of harmful fine particulates (PM2.5), protecting the lungs of our children and neighbors.
🏆 It could remain profitable while being "better neighbors."

📣 Our Call to Action
Our State and local officials need to ensure the CTGCD understands that industrial rock crushers can operate successfully WITHOUT massive industrial groundwater pumping.

We demand that CTGCD evaluate the minimum water required for a dry vacuum system and only permit a usage level that supports this sustainable technology. Why should we give away our most precious resource just because an out-of-state corporation refuses to invest in the right equipment?

Stay Hopeful. Stay Vigilant.
We have the facts, we have the evidence, and we have the will to keep fighting. We are not just protecting Hoover Valley Road; we are protecting a way of life in our beloved Hill Country. We will not let our water be wasted while a better solution exists.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 83 - 83 updates and a new chapter of action

2/14/26

To the SaveBurnet.com Community,

Since we began this journey, we have issued 82 updates—82 milestones of a community refusing to be silenced. What started as a frantic call to action in August 2024 has matured into one of the most organized and scientifically backed grassroots movements in the Texas Hill Country.

As we look at the path we’ve traveled, it is clear that our "plight" is no longer just a local concern; it is a landmark case for property rights, water conservation, and environmental justice in Texas.

The Path We’ve Undertaken: A Summary of Our Journey

📍 The Awakening (August – September 2024): Our journey began with a "David vs. Goliath" moment. When Asphalt Inc. (Lone Star Paving) filed for an air quality permit for a 715-acre rock-crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road, they likely expected a quiet process. Instead, they met over 750 residents at the Burnet Community Center. We quickly realized that this facility wasn't just a "quarry"—it was a massive industrial footprint threatening to sit right next to Camp Longhorn and at the doorstep of Inks Lake State Park and Longhorn Cavern.
📊 Building the Scientific Bulwark: We didn't just complain; we gathered data. We deployed a network of Air monitors to create a scientific "baseline" of our air quality. We proved that the silica dust and particulate matter from such a site would not just be an eyesore—it would be a health crisis for our children and elderly.
💧 The Fight for Our Water: Our journey took us deep into the geology of the Ellenburger-San Saba & Hickory Aquifers. We highlighted the terrifying reality that this plant’s industrial water needs could rival the annual consumption of the entire City of Burnet. Our persistence led to a massive victory in early 2026, when the Burnet County Commissioners voted unanimously to oppose the issuance of any new groundwater production permit—temporary or permanent— without a thorough study having been presented to CTGCD and a finding is made by CTGCD that said permit application and issuance poses no risk to domestic wells, agricultural operations, public water systems, natural resources, or the long-term sustainability of the Hickory Aquifer or any groundwater source within Burnet County.
⚖️ The Legislative and Legal Front: We have taken our fight to the TCEQ, the LCRA, and the Texas State Capitol. We have filed motions, contested permits, and worked closely with Senator Pete Flores and State Rep. Ellen Troxclair in their efforts to change the law and protect our community. While the regulatory road is long and often frustrating, our legal presence ensures that the developers will not gain an inch unless every action is strictly lawful and fully compliant with the protections our community deserves.

📢 New: Monthly Public Progress Meetings
We recognize that as our legal and technical battles become more complex, it is more important than ever to stay connected with you face-to-face. Therefore, SaveBurnet.com is proud to announce a new series of Monthly Public Meetings.
These meetings are designed to be transparent and collaborative. We will provide detailed briefings on the actions that have been taken and actions in work, including environmental monitoring. We will also provide an outline of future items and permits that we will be fighting. Most importantly, we are reserving time at the end of every meeting for a Public Q&A session to answer your questions about the status of the proposed Rock Crusher on Hoover Valley Road.

Upcoming Highlights:

🗓️ More Info Coming: Over the next few weeks, we will be providing more detailed information and materials regarding these meetings.
🎙️ Guest Speakers: Starting after our first session, we will begin hosting guest speakers to provide expert insight into the legal, environmental, and health impacts of industrial rock crushing.

Join us for our Inaugural Meeting:

📅 WHEN: Wednesday, March 18th, 2026
⏰ TIME: 6:00 PM
📍 WHERE: Burnet County AgriLife Extension Office
🏠 ADDRESS: 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611

Everyone is welcome! We strongly encourage you to bring your friends, family, and neighbors. This is a community-wide issue, and the more voices we have in the room, the stronger our message becomes to those who want to industrialize our home.

This journey began because we refused to let our Hill Country heritage be crushed for profit. 82 updates later (now 83), our resolve has only hardened. We look forward to seeing you and your loved ones on March 18th to discuss how we finish this fight together.

The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 82 - the air we breathe - why our fight is more urgent than ever

2/7/26

To the Dedicated Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

We are writing today with a critical update regarding the air quality in the Greater Burnet area and the ongoing threat posed by the proposed Asphalt Inc. rock crushing plant on Hoover Valley Road.

📡 The Oversight Continues
Despite the rapid growth of industrial activity in our region, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) still has zero air quality monitors in Burnet County. In fact, the closest TCEQ monitor remains 30 miles away and is frequently upwind, meaning it cannot accurately measure the local impact of our 17 existing quarries.

🌬️ Evidence from Our Neighbors
We don’t have to guess what happens when quarries fail to control their dust. We have already documented that dust from existing quarries in Marble Falls travels 7 to 10 miles, easily reaching the Greater Burnet area. When the wind shifts to the northeast, our local air quality readings degrade by 7 to 16 points on the US EPA scale. If established quarries cannot manage their harmful emissions, there is no reason to believe a new, massive operation by Asphalt Inc. will be any different.

🛠️ SaveBurnet.com Takes Action
Because the state has failed to monitor our air, we have stepped up. SaveBurnet.com has strategically installed and now maintains 5 professional air monitors surrounding the proposed quarry site to establish a clear baseline of our air quality. This real-time US EPA 2.5PM data is fully open to the public to view and download.
Click here to access the full report at SaveBurnet.com Scroll down to "Protecting Burnet's Air"

⚠️ The Real Cost: Our Health
This isn't just about dust; it’s about our health. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) can penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream, increasing risks for asthma, bronchitis, and heart disease. The elderly and children are at the highest risk.
Shockingly, this proposed quarry would sit right next door to a kids' camp where thousands of children spend their summer playing and sleeping in open-air cabins. For the many campers who already struggle with respiratory illnesses, this industrial dust is a direct threat to their safety.

🤝 The Fight Continues
There is only one Inks Lake, one Hoover Valley, and one Camp Longhorn. Once this rare part of the Texas Hill Country is gone, it is gone for good.

We remain hopeful because of you. SaveBurnet.com is still in the fight, standing as a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves. Your continued donations and support are what keep this movement alive and allow us to maintain the monitoring systems that hold these industries accountable.
Thank you for leading, for caring, and for standing with us.

The SaveBurnet.com Team One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 81 - Groundwater Is the Deciding Battle — Here’s Where We Stand

1/30/26

Dear Friends and Supporters,

As we move into the next phase of our effort to stop the proposed rock crushing facility on FM 3509, we want to provide a clear, straightforward update on where things stand today, what matters most right now, and what comes next.
This is a long fight — but it is far from over. In many ways, the most important decisions are still ahead.

📍 Where We Are Right Now
Here is the current status:

❌ No groundwater permit application has been submitted to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) by Burnet Ranch Investments / Asphalt Inc.
⏳ Because no permit has been filed, no public hearing has been scheduled.
📊 Well drilling and drawdown testing have occurred, and the data is being reviewed as part of an upcoming hydrology report.
🏛️ Burnet County leadership has taken a stand, unanimously approving a resolution opposing the proposed quarry.
🤝 SaveBurnet.com continues active coordination with:
- CTGCD
- City of Burnet officials
- Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | TCEQ
- Texas Parks & Wildlife Department
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | US EPA
- State leadership and legislative offices

This process is deliberate — and that works in our favor.

💧 Why Groundwater Is the Deciding Battleground
The groundwater permit is now the most consequential remaining approval Asphalt Inc. needs.
An industrial groundwater permit of the size being discussed would:

Compete directly with and impact homes, ranches, and small businesses
Place heavy stress on the Hickory Aquifer, which is already declining
Undermine water conservation efforts residents are being asked to follow
Set a dangerous precedent for industrial pumping in rural Burnet County

This is no longer just about one site on FM 3509 — it affects the entire community.

📊 What the Well Testing Really Means
Drawdown testing measures how much water a well can produce and how that pumping affects surrounding wells.
So far:

CTGCD has been monitoring multiple nearby wells
Preliminary observations show measurable impacts during testing
Long-term effects still must be modeled and reviewed

The forthcoming hydrology report will play a major role in whether a permit is:

Denied
Reduced
Or approved with strict limitations

This science matters — and CTGCD is taking it seriously.

📢 What Supporters Should Be Ready For
Once a groundwater permit application is filed:

CTGCD will provide at least 30 days’ public notice
A public hearing will be scheduled
Community turnout will be critical
- While we had over 850 attend the TCEQ public meeting, we are expecting well over 1000 in attendance for the CTGCD public meeting.

When that time comes, SaveBurnet.com will:

Provide clear talking points
Help coordinate attendance
Assist residents in submitting effective comments

We will give you plenty of notice — but being prepared now is key.

💪 Why This Fight Is Still Winnable
It’s important to remember:

Asphalt Inc. has not secured the hardest permits
Industrial water demand remains a major red flag
Local, county, and community opposition is:
- Organized
- Informed
- Growing

And if agencies fail to protect the community, legal options remain available.
We are not reacting — we are building a record, step by step.

🤝 How You Can Help Right Now
While we wait for the next formal action:

Stay subscribed and share updates with neighbors
Talk with others about groundwater impacts
Attend local meetings when possible
Support SaveBurnet.com financially if you are able — donations help fund research, monitoring, and advocacy
- Please Click Here for link to how to donate page on SaveBurnet.com. Scroll down to "Donate to our cause"

Every action, no matter how small, strengthens this effort.

🌿 Moving Forward — Together
This is a patient fight. A disciplined fight. And one we are prepared to win.
Thank you for staying engaged, asking thoughtful questions, and standing up for Burnet County’s water, land, and future.
We will continue to keep you informed — and we will be ready when the next step comes.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 80 - stay warm, stay informed, and stay determined

1/23/26

Dear Friends and Supporters,

❄️ As we head into the weekend, we want to wish everyone a warm and safe few days ahead.
Our area is under a winter storm warning for the next three days, so please take precautions, check on neighbors when possible, and stay safe.
We also want to share an important update addressing three questions that many of you have raised recently. Transparency, accuracy, and persistence remain at the heart of our mission, and we appreciate how engaged and thoughtful this community continues to be.

❓ Question #1: Radium Levels & Quarry Water Use
In Update #75, we reported that the City of Tow, Texas documented radium levels up to 8× above federal limits in wells drawing from the Hickory Aquifer.
Because the proposed rock quarry plans to use large volumes of groundwater for dust suppression, many of you asked:
Does the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) test or monitor radium levels in the wells drilled by Asphalt Inc.?

✅ Answer
We contacted CTGCD directly to clarify this.
• CTGCD does monitor and regulate many aspects of groundwater wells (such as spacing, pumping volumes, and reporting)
• However, CTGCD does not currently test for or monitor radium levels in production wells
• This includes the wells drilled by Asphalt Inc. and those proposed for quarry operations
⚠️ Why this matters:
If radium-contaminated groundwater is used for dust suppression, the water evaporates — but the radioactive material does not.
It can be left behind in dust, sediment, and sludge, potentially spreading beyond the quarry site.

❓ Question #2: How Much Water Is 322 Acre-Feet Per Year?
Many followers asked us to help put Asphalt Inc.’s reported water usage into context.
💧 What does 322 acre-feet per year really mean?

✅ Answer
• 322 acre-feet = over 105 million gallons of water per year
• This is an enormous amount of water for a single industrial operation
• Especially when you consider that the average size APO or Quarry in Texas only employs ~15 people
📊 Important comparison
Based on:
• Using TCEQ Water Usage Reports (WUR) and groundwater estimates, the city of Burnet will use about 312 acre feet of ground water in a year.
➡️ This single proposed rock quarry would pump more groundwater each year than the entire City of Burnet — a city of 7,000+ residents.
This highlights the disproportionate burden such an operation places one of our aquifers.

❓ Question #3: Has a Groundwater Permit Been Filed? Is There a Public Hearing Date?

✅ Answer
Many of you are understandably watching this very closely.
📅 Current status (as of January 22, 2026):
• ❌ No groundwater permit application has been submitted by Asphalt Inc. to CTGCD
• ❌ No public meeting has been scheduled
📢 What happens next?
Once a permit application is submitted:
• CTGCD is required to provide at least 30 days’ advance notice
• Notices will be placed in local newspapers
• SaveBurnet.com will immediately notify the community and provide guidance on how to participate

🌱 In Closing
This effort has never been about just one permit or one company.
It’s about protecting our water, our air, our health, and our Hill Country way of life.
💪 Because of your teamwork, vigilance, and determination:
• Questions are being asked
• Agencies are being contacted
• And accountability is increasing

If you are able, please consider donating to support our ongoing work — legal review, technical analysis, public outreach, and community education all require resources.
CLICK HERE to donate, and then scroll down.
Every voice matters. Every action counts.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 79 - MAJOR WIN! Burnet County Commissioners sign resolution Opposing Groundwater Permit until a thorough study is performed

1/16/26

Friends and Followers,

We have incredible news to share! In a massive step forward for our cause, the Burnet County Commissioners Court has unanimously approved a formal resolution opposing the issuance of new groundwater production permits—temporary or permanent—until a "thorough study" is presented to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD).

This resolution is a direct response to the threat posed by high-volume industrial operations, specifically the proposed Asphalt Inc. rock crushing plant on FM 3509. Our leaders are now formally demanding that any such application prove it poses "no risk" to domestic wells, agricultural operations, public water systems, natural resources, or the long-term sustainability of the Hickory Aquifer.

Why Your Support Matters
This victory belongs to you. Seeing our county leaders stand up for the health, safety, and water security of Burnet County proves that when we speak with one voice, we cannot be ignored. We are profoundly thankful to County Judge Bryan Wilson and Commissioners Jim Luther, Damon Beierle, Chad Collier, and Joe Don Dockery for standing up for what is best for the City and County of Burnet.

What’s Next?
The SaveBurnet.com Team is currently working closely with the Mayor of Burnet, the City Council members, and the City Manager to secure their support for a similar resolution. Uniting both the City and County is critical to stopping this facility and protecting the resources we all share.

View the Resolution
You can read the full text of the signed resolution on our website. It is available under the following tabs:

Take Action SaveBurnet.com/take-action.html.
Reference Material / Water Related SaveBurnet.com/water-related-info.html

How You Can Help
To keep up this momentum and fund our ongoing mission—including legal fees, signage, and community outreach—we need your continued support. If you are able, please donate to our cause. Every contribution helps us stand strong. Details and instructions on how to donate via check, QR code, or our GoFundMe page are available on our website at SaveBurnet.com/take-action.html.

Stay Strong
This is a marathon, not a sprint, but the momentum is firmly on our side. Remain committed. Remain strong. We are fighting for our water, our safety, and our children's future.

With sincere appreciation,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 78 - Half of Burnet’s Drinking Water Comes from Inks Lake — Here’s Why That Matters

1/4/25

Dear Neighbors and Supporters,

We hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and wish you a happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year as we head into 2026.

As we begin the new year, we want to share an important reminder about why this fight matters to every resident of Burnet County—even those who do not live near the proposed rock crusher site.

Why This Impacts the Entire City of Burnet
Approximately 50% of the City of Burnet’s drinking water comes from Inks Lake, delivered through a 13-mile-long, 16-inch water pipeline. This water is drawn from the Devil’s Backbone cove, the same cove as Inks Lake State Park and Devil’s Watering Hole.
This matters because that same cove is fed by Spring Creek.
And Spring Creek, in turn, is directly downstream from the property where Asphalt Inc. proposes to build and operate a rock crushing quarry.

The Risk We Cannot Ignore
If the proposed quarry becomes operational, stormwater runoff, sediment, and industrial contamination from the site could travel downstream via Spring Creek, eventually reaching Devil’s Backbone cove on Inks Lake—the very location where Burnet draws half of its municipal water supply.
This means that even residents who live miles away from the quarry site could be affected. Please Click Here for related Map & Information about the Quarry's effect on Devil's Backbone cove. Scroll down to "General water related information", then select "Understanding where the Rock Quarry's sediment and Contamination will flow".
And the risk doesn’t stop there.
Water from Inks Lake continues downstream through the Highland Lakes chain, ultimately contributing to Austin’s drinking water supply. What enters Inks Lake does not stay isolated—it moves.

Massive Industrial Water Use
As a reminder, Asphalt Inc. is seeking an industrial groundwater pumping permit from CTGCD exceeding 300,000 gallons per day. That amount of water is equivalent to the daily usage of more than 1,200 family households.
In a region already experiencing water stress, this level of industrial extraction puts our aquifers, creeks, lakes, and communities at serious risk.

Stay Informed. Stay Involved.We encourage you to visit SaveBurnet.com for additional details, updates, and supporting documentation. If you are able, please consider donating to support our continued efforts—every contribution helps us protect our water, our parks, and our future.
Thank you for standing with us, for staying engaged, and for caring deeply about our community. We enter 2026 with gratitude, determination, and hope—knowing that together, our voices make a difference.

With sincere appreciation,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 77 - Our groundwater is not unlimited - and it is worth protecting

12/19/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,
As we head into the holiday season, we want to pause and talk about one of the most critical issues facing Burnet County today: our groundwater.

Groundwater Is the Lifeline of Burnet County
Unlike large cities, Burnet County does not rely on a centralized water system. Most residents, ranchers, small businesses, youth camps, and rural communities depend almost entirely on private groundwater wells drawn from the Hickory, Ellenburger, and related aquifers.
These aquifers:

Recharge slowly
Are highly sensitive to over-pumping
Are already under stress from drought, growth, and climate variability

Groundwater is not just another resource — it is our only reliable source of water.

Water Tables Are Dropping — and the Community Is Feeling It
Across Burnet County, we are already seeing the effects of declining groundwater levels:

Wells taking longer to recover
Pumps running harder and failing prematurely
Water quality changes as deeper zones are tapped
Increased costs for repairs, deepening wells, or drilling new ones

These are not theoretical concerns. They are happening now, to our neighbors.

Why an INDUSTRIAL Groundwater Permit Is a Serious Threat
The proposed rock quarry off FM 3509 is not asking for household or agricultural use — it is seeking industrial-scale groundwater pumping to support rock crushing operations, including dust suppression.
Industrial pumping:

Removes millions of gallons of water per month
Does not replenish at the same rate it is extracted
Lowers the water table for surrounding wells
Shifts the burden and cost to nearby homeowners and ranchers

Once groundwater is depleted or destabilized, it cannot be easily or quickly restored.
Allowing an industrial groundwater permit in an area already under water stress risks:

Drying out neighboring residential wells
Forcing families to drill deeper or abandon wells
Reducing water availability for ranching and livestock
Creating long-term economic and environmental hardship

This is not responsible water stewardship — especially when residents are already being asked to conserve.

Why We Are Standing Firm
Burnet County’s groundwater should serve:

The people who live here
The land that sustains us
Our youth camps, parks, and rural communities

It should not be sacrificed for short-term industrial gain.
That is why SaveBurnet.com continues to oppose granting an industrial groundwater permit for this rock quarry. Protecting groundwater protects everyone — today and for generations to come.

Looking Ahead — and Staying United
We know this fight takes time. We know it can feel exhausting. But real change happens because people refuse to give up.
As we celebrate Christmas with our families and neighbors, let us remember what we are fighting for:

Clean water
Strong communities
A future where Burnet County remains a place worth calling home

Please continue to:

Stay informed
Stay engaged
Support SaveBurnet.com if you are able to donate
Encourage friends and family to sign up for updates

From all of us at SaveBurnet.com — Merry Christmas.Thank you for your commitment, your courage, and your belief that protecting our water is worth the fight.
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 76 - common apo violations & How you can help protect burnet county

12/5/2025:

Dear Neighbors and Supporters,
As we continue monitoring the proposed FM 3509 rock quarry and the growing number of Aggregate Production Operation (APO) sites across Burnet County, our team has been gathering detailed information on the most frequent violations committed by APOs right here in our region.

After 16 months, Asphalt Inc. still does not have all the permits required to construct and operate a rock quarry on Hoover Valley Road in Burnet, Texas. Even though this quarry isn’t yet operational, our County already has numerous active APOs—so it’s important for everyone to understand what kinds of violations commonly occur and how they impact our community.
Burnet County’s terrain, aquifers, and lake systems make us especially vulnerable when APOs cut corners—and unfortunately, many do. Below is a list of the most common violations, followed by clear steps you can take to report problems and protect our land, water, and air.

I. The Most Common APO Violations in Burnet County
1. Sediment Runoff Into Creeks and Lakes
Uncontrolled erosion and stormwater runoff routinely wash sediment into:
Hamilton Creek · Spring Creek · Peters Creek · Shaw Creek · Morgan Creek · Oatmeal Creek · Reese Creek
These creeks feed directly into Lake LBJ, Lake Buchanan, Inks Lake, and the Colorado River, making this one of the most common and damaging violations.
2. Operating Without a Stormwater Permit
Some APOs begin clearing land or operating before obtaining the required TCEQ Construction General Permit or Multi-Sector General Permit.
3. Failure to Install Adequate Erosion Controls
Frequent problems include:

Missing or broken silt fencing
Overflowing sediment ponds
Unstabilized slopes
Stormwater bypassing containment areas entirely

4. Improper Dewatering of Pits
Many operators illegally pump turbid, muddy water into roadside ditches or natural drainages—especially after large storms.
5. Dust Leaving Quarry Boundaries
Airborne dust affects:

Hoover Valley
Inks Lake State Park
Camp Longhorn
Homes along FM 2341, FM 3509, and FM 963

This includes PM10/PM2.5 crystalline silica, known to cause respiratory illness.
6. Running Crushers Without Dust Suppression
Violations include:

Broken or missing spray systems
No water trucks on-site
Running dry during drought conditions

7. Groundwater Pumping Violations (CTGCD)
Frequent issues reported to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) include:

Pumping without authorization
Exceeding permitted volumes
Failing to submit well logs or reports
Fuel or chemical leaks near recharge zones

8. Unsafe Blasting Practices
Residents often report:

House-shaking vibrations
Blasts outside permitted hours
No advance notice
Flyrock leaving site boundaries

9. Unsafe Truck Traffic
Hazards include:

Trucks entering FM 281, FM 2341, or FM 3509 without flaggers
Mud and rock tracked onto public roads
Overloaded trucks damaging pavement

10. Administrative & Reporting Violations
Common problems:

Failing to register as an APO
Missing permit documents
Misreporting distances, acreage, or water usage

II. How Citizens Can Help — Your Actions Matter
Burnet County has far more APOs than TCEQ has inspectors. Most enforcement actions begin because residents speak up.
Here’s how you can make an impact:

Document What You See
- Take photos or videos (from public roads or your own property).
- Record date, time, weather, direction of dust or water flow, and duration.
- Multiple witness reports strengthen your case.
File Complaints With TCEQ
- Use the TCEQ Online Complaint Form or call 1-888-777-3186.
- Named complaints receive faster response (anonymous submissions are also allowed).
Report Well or Groundwater Issues to CTGCD
- Visit ctgcd.org or call 512-756-4900.
- Report sudden well level drops, pump strain, or water discoloration.
Report Road Hazards or Unsafe Truck Traffic
- Contact the Burnet County Road & Bridge Department or the Sheriff’s Office (non-emergency line).
Report Blasting Concerns
- For off-hour blasts or excessive vibrations, call the Burnet County Sheriff’s Office and record details.
Share Information With SaveBurnet.com
- Your photos and documentation help us submit verified reports, build enforcement cases, and keep the public informed.
Attend County and CTGCD Meetings
- Your presence matters—officials act when they see the community engaged.

III. Together, We Make a Difference
Burnet County is one of the most environmentally sensitive areas in Central Texas. Our lakes, creeks, and aquifers depend on us staying vigilant.
Your reports, your voice, and your ongoing support ensure that officials remain accountable and that our Hill Country remains protected for generations to come.
Thank you for your continued dedication to this cause — we are making progress because of you.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 75 - radiological risks in the hickory aquifer & highland lakes

11/21/2025:

Protecting Burnet County: Understanding the Radiological Risks of Using Hickory Aquifer Water at the Proposed FM 3509 Rock Crushing Plant

Burnet County residents rely heavily on groundwater from the Hickory Aquifer and surface water from the Highland Lakes as our primary sources of drinking water. These water bodies are connected parts of a regional hydrologic system that supports more than one million Central Texans. Because of this, any industrial activity that interacts with groundwater or creates runoff toward the Highland Lakes needs to be examined with exceptional care.

The proposed rock-crushing plant on FM 3509 would withdraw large volumes of water from the Hickory Aquifer for dust suppression and rock washing. Scientific, regulatory, and historical records show that this aquifer contains naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) — including radium-226, radium-228, gross alpha emitters, and radon — at levels that in many locations exceed federal drinking-water standards. This is not theoretical: multiple systems in Burnet, Llano, and San Saba Counties have documented exceedances.

1. What the Data Already Tells Us: The Hickory Aquifer Has Radiological Hotspots
Local and regional agencies have been aware of these issues for years:

LCRA has operated a specialized radium-removal treatment system for the Tow Village Water System because the raw Hickory Aquifer water contained radium levels 8× above federal limits and gross alpha near 140 pCi/L.
Region K Water Planning Group (supported by LCRA) published a section titled “Radionuclides in the Hickory and Marble Falls Aquifers,” identifying multiple water systems — including some in Burnet County — with radium and gross alpha levels above the EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs).
CTGCD documents that the Hickory aquifer locally contains alpha and radium concentrations above standards, and flow within the aquifer is “restricted by block faulting,” meaning water movement is complex and can shift with pumping demands, seismic activity or explosions.

These findings make one thing clear: the Hickory Aquifer is not uniformly safe, and its chemistry can vary dramatically by depth, location, or pumping conditions.

2. Can Contaminated Water from the Tow/Lake Buchanan Area Migrate Toward FM 3509?
Even if wells near the proposed quarry test “clean” today, that does not guarantee long-term safety.
The Hickory Aquifer is part of a regional sandstone system encircling the Llano Uplift. Water can and does move long distances underground — and its pathways can change when new, high-volume wells begin pumping. Because block faulting creates partially isolated compartments, a new pumping center can begin to pull water from deeper zones or from adjacent blocks that previously contributed little flow.
In simple terms:

“Clean today” does not mean “clean tomorrow.”
Pumping for the FM 3509 quarry could gradually pull in water with a different, more radiologically elevated signature, similar to the Tow/Lake Buchanan area.

This risk alone justifies a detail geological study prior to the CTGCD permit being issued. SaveBurnet.com would also request time to have it's own independent 3rd party engineering firm confirm the findings before the CTGCD permit gets approved. If the Rock Quarry is allowed to build and operate, then CTGCD shall demand a baseline testing AND ongoing annual radiological monitoring for any production wells feeding the quarry.

3. Safety Concerns at the Plant: NORM Concentration in Dust, Sludge & Aerosols
Using raw Hickory water at a rock-crushing facility creates additional risks beyond drinking exposure.
When radium-bearing water is sprayed into the open air, washed across rock, or allowed to evaporate in settling ponds, the water disappears but the radioactive minerals remain. Over time, they concentrate in:

wash-plant sediment
settling-pond sludge
haul-road dust
fine particulate matter (PM10 / PM2.5)
rock coatings and tailings

EPA research shows that radium strongly binds to fine sediments, creating TENORM (Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material) — the same issue that drinking-water plants face when filtering radionuclide-rich groundwater.
These particles can be:

Inhaled by workers,
Blown onto neighboring properties, or
Washed into waterways during storms. Please reference the presentation provided to LCRA warning of a potential flood at the proposed Rock Quarry site which would wash all sludge from the Rock Quarry location into the highland Lakes water supply. this information was provided to LCRA 1 month prior to the July 3rd devastating floods. Also reference updated presentation on the SaveBurnet.com website that shows pictures of the floods at the proposed rock quarry site. Both presentations ( "Irresponsible & Incompetent that LCRA & TCEQ issued permits to Asphalt Inc." & "Water concerns related to the proposed Rock Crushing plant on FM 3509") can be found by Clicking Here, then scroll down to LCRA related information.

The information above is not hypothetical — it is a predictable chemical behavior of radium and uranium in sediment systems.

4. Downstream Risk: Sludge and Contaminated Sediment Entering the Highland Lakes
The FM 3509 site drains toward waters that eventually feed the Highland Lakes, including Inks Lake, and Lake LBJ. These lakes are:

Texas’ primary drinking-water reservoirs
Used by over 1–1.4 million residents
Managed and protected by LCRA’s Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance

If radionuclide-bearing quarry sludge or fine sediments enter these waters, even intermittently, several long-term risks emerge:
A. Sediment ContaminationRadium adheres to fine particles and settles at the bottom of lakes, creating “hot spots” in coves and shallow areas. Over time, this can impact lake ecology and accumulate in biologically active zones.
B. Increased TENORM burden at water-treatment plantsEven if lake water looks clean and dilute, radium can concentrate inside municipal treatment facilities, increasing operational costs and sludge-disposal challenges.
C. Risk to recreation and shoreline usersFamilies swim in shallow, silt-rich coves — exactly where contaminated sediment settles.

Preventing these exposures requires:

Lined, engineered ponds
Zero-discharge designs
Radionuclide testing of sludge
Stormwater controls
Routine radiological monitoring of downstream water bodies

5. What Burnet County Should Require Before Any Quarry is Approved
Based on the scientific and regulatory record, the following steps are justified:

Full radiological testing of all on-site wells
Annual radiological monitoring (gross alpha, Ra-226/228, uranium, radon)
Engineered, lined settling ponds with storm-event capacity equal to that of the recent July 3rd 2025 flood.
No discharge of wash water or sludge toward Highland Lakes
TENORM screening of all sludge, fines, and sediment
Third-party hydrogeologic review of pumping impacts
Coordination with LCRA, given its long history of managing radium in Hickory water

Burnet County deserves full protection and transparency when our drinking water and environment are at stake — not assumptions, not promises, and not bare-minimum regulatory filings.
A copy of this presentation ("Understanding the Radiological Risks of Using Hickory Aquifer Water at the Proposed FM 3509 Rock Crushing Plant") can be found by Clicking Here, then scrolling down to CTGCD related information.

Together, We Make a DifferenceYour continued support keeps this movement strong. By staying informed and engaged, we ensure that decision-makers understand how much our community values its water, its land, and its parks.
Thank you for standing with us. Together, we will protect the Texas Hill Country we love.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 74 - new presentations: groundwater & Recycled water impact

11/14/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,
We’re excited to announce that two new presentations have just been added to our website. These updates provide critical information about our ongoing efforts to protect Burnet County’s groundwater and expose misleading claims surrounding “recycled water” used by rock crushing operations.
📘 View both new presentations here: 👉 www.SaveBurnet.com

Update on Groundwater, Wells & Monitoring (November 2025)
Recycled Water – What Does It Really Mean? (November 7, 2025)

(Available under the “Reference Material" tab, then select "Water Related Info" and scroll down to "General Water Related information".)

💧 1. Update on Groundwater, Wells & Monitoring (November 2025)
This new report summarizes the latest well testing and monitoring data gathered near FM 3509 and posted by the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD).
Key points include:

Drawdown testing completed: Asphalt Inc. (Burnet Ranch Investments) conducted 24-hour tests on two of its newly drilled wells, each roughly 650 feet deep and likely drawing from the Hickory Aquifer.
Measured declines: CTGCD monitored seven surrounding wells and recorded noticeable water-level drops during Asphalt Inc.’s testing period. These early results are concerning and will require detailed modeling to determine long-term impacts on local residents and ranchers.
Next steps: Westward Engineering, working for Asphalt Inc., is finalizing a Hydrology Report that CTGCD will have independently reviewed by a third-party firm—to assess the true impact of large-scale or industrial pumping.
Public hearing to come: Before any groundwater permit is approved, CTGCD will hold a public meeting with 10–30 days’ notice. This will be the community’s opportunity to voice concerns, and we’ll need every SaveBurnet.com supporter present.

This presentation illustrates the potential scale of water use--up to 9.7 million gallons per month—for dust abatement alone. It is estimated that 1/2 of this will need to come from the local aquifer.

🔄 2. Recycled Water – What Does It Really Mean? (November 7, 2025)
The second presentation clarifies how rock crushing operators often claim to use “recycled” or “reclaimed” water—but in reality, most of this water originates from local groundwater wells.
Key takeaways:

Recycled ≠ Sustainable: While some water may be reused for dust suppression, the majority is still drawn from the aquifer, and significant portions are lost to evaporation, overspray, and absorption into the rock base.
Water loss estimates: Studies suggest that between 40–60% of water used for dust control at rock crushers is permanently lost—not recycled.
Hot, dry climate factor: In Central Texas, with high heat and low humidity, evaporation rates are among the highest in the country, making “recycling” even less effective.
Real-world impact: Industrial-scale operations could deplete groundwater resources critical to local ranches, residences, and ecosystems, especially during drought conditions.

This presentation was created to give residents clear, factual talking points when discussing “recycled water” claims with officials or agencies.

📊 Next Steps & What to Expect
Both presentations are preliminary updates. Once the Hydrology Report is complete and verified, SaveBurnet.com will post the findings online and distribute them to all followers. This report will be essential in understanding how Asphalt Inc.’s groundwater use could affect neighboring wells and the overall aquifer health.

💪 Together, We Make a Difference
Your continued support keeps this movement strong. By staying informed and engaged, we ensure that decision-makers understand how much our community values its water, its land, and its parks.
Thank you for standing with us. Together, we will protect the Texas Hill Country we love.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 73 - "recycled water" at rock quarries - what it really means for our wells

11/7/2025:

Initial Monitoring Results: A Clear Warning

The initial well data from the monitoring network off of FM 3509 "Hoover Valley Road" show a strong correlation between the water pumped from the Asphalt Inc. Test wells and the declining water levels in nearby residential wells. This confirms what many of us feared — that large-scale groundwater withdrawals for industrial use will adversely impact surrounding homeowners and will continue to have a long-term effect on the Burnet County aquifer if left unchecked.

What the APOs Are Saying
Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) and rock-crushing facilities often claim that they will use “mostly recycled” or “reclaimed” water for dust abatement. While that sounds responsible, the truth is far more complicated — and far less sustainable — especially in our hot, dry, windy Texas Hill Country environment.

What Really Happens to That Water
APOs spray large amounts of water on roads, crushers, conveyors and stockpiles to keep dust down. Some of this water is collected in ponds and reused, but a large share is permanently lost through evaporation, drift, leakage, and infiltration.
Here’s a breakdown based on environmental and engineering data:

Source of Water Loss - Typical Loss % - Explanation

Evaporation - 20–40% - Fine mist evaporates instantly in 90–100°F air and low humidity.
Overspray & Drift - 10–20% - Wind carries water away from target areas.
Infiltration / Leakage - 10–30% - Water seeps into unlined roads, pits, or leaks from ponds and pipes.
Carried Offsite - 2–5% - Water leaves with crushed rock, truck tires, and equipment.

Even under best-case engineered conditions (world class systems with lined ponds and closed-loop systems), at least 20–30% of the water is lost for good.

But most APOs in Burnet County operate open-air, unlined systems, where 40–70% of their water use is effectively consumed — gone from the aquifer forever.

The Real Numbers Behind “Recycling”
Let’s put this in perspective:

The Air Quality permit granted to Asphalt Inc. by TCEQ lists water usage for dust abatement at 21,600 - 324,000 gallons per day.

An APO pumping 300,000 gallons of water per day for dust control may claim it’s “recycling” the water — but in reality:
At 50% loss, that’s 150,000 gallons/day gone.
Over a month, that’s 4.5 million gallons permanently removed from the aquifer.
That’s equivalent to the monthly water use of about 600 Burnet County households.

Why It Matters
These “recycling” claims can sound environmentally friendly, but they mask the true groundwater impact. Every gallon lost to evaporation or infiltration comes directly from the same aquifers that supply our homes and wells.

The Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) manages local well permits, but current permits often don’t account for total water loss — only for the amount pumped. That gap makes it critical for residents to stay informed and involved.

What You Can Do
✅ Ask CTGCD and TCEQ to require complete water-balance reporting in APO permit applications. More information will be provided in future SaveBurnet.com updates.
✅ Support and expand well monitoring programs to document water level changes.
✅ Share this update with neighbors and encourage them to subscribe at SaveBurnet.com.
✅ Stay engaged — data and persistence are our strongest tools to protect our wells and the Texas Hill Country we love.

Together, we can ensure that Burnet County’s groundwater remains clean, available, and protected for generations to come.
– The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 72 - CTGCD response & next steps in the fight to protect our water

10/24/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

Thank you to everyone who took the time to write to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD). Your messages are making a real difference — the board is aware that our community is paying close attention.

Many of you have received a response similar to one of the following:
“Thank you for your email. Your comments have been received and will be retained for the record. A permit application has not yet been submitted. Once a permit application is administratively complete, a permit hearing will be scheduled and posted, at which time public comments will be accepted.”
“Hi, thanks for your note. As of this morning (10/15/25), we have yet to receive an application at the District office. I can assure you that the Groundwater District will follow the law and follow the science in the evaluation of a permit when or if we receive it.”

You’ll notice that both responses confirm that Burnet Ranch Investments (aka Asphalt Inc.) has not yet submitted a groundwater permit — this is true. But activity is happening behind the scenes, and your continued involvement will be critical as the process moves forward.

Where Things Stand Now
By reviewing well data on the CTGCD Well Map (Click Here to View), you will see the outline of Burnet County, zoom in on FM 3509 just south of Williams Road to see the three light blue dots representing the Asphalt Inc. wells. Here’s what we know so far:

Well #1 — 24-hour drawdown test began on October 1st. Estimated output: ~100 GPM.
(Note:, Looking at the Well map data, the large dips on Sept. 11–13 reflect pump removal, not test results.)
Well #2 — Drilled with a 2" casing; this is a monitoring well only, not suitable for production.
Well #3 — 24-hour drawdown test began on September 29th. Estimated output: ~50 GPM.
(Note: Looking at the Well Map data, the Large dips on Sept. 11–15 reflect pump removal, not test results.)
CTGCD is monitoring seven surrounding wells and collecting data from Asphalt Inc.’s monitoring well (#2).
Early data shows negative impacts on nearby well levels during Asphalt Inc.’s 24-hour drawdown test — a serious concern for area residents and ranchers. Long-term effects must still be modeled.
Westward Engineering (hired by Asphalt Inc.) is preparing the Hydrology Report, expected in the coming weeks.
Once submitted, CTGCD will review and correspond with Westward — a process that may take several more weeks.
Asphalt Inc. is expected to request an “Over 50 GPM or Industrial” groundwater permit for the two production wells combined (well #1 & well #3).
Before any decision is made, CTGCD will hold a public meeting.
👉 This will be our community’s opportunity to speak out — we will need ALL 3,000+ SaveBurnet.com followers to attend and voice concerns.
After the public hearing, the CTGCD Board will deliberate. There are only three possible outcomes:
- Permit Rejected ✅
- Permit Approved as Submitted ❌
- Permit Approved with Reduced Pumping Limits ⚠️
  Let’s hope for the first outcome — a full rejection of the permit.

Additional Updates

1. Lake Buchanan Community Alliance (LBCA) Meeting
LBCA has been a tremendous supporter of SaveBurnet.com and continues to lead in water resource advocacy. Please join us and show your support at their upcoming meeting — wear your green SaveBurnet T-shirt!
📅 Monday, October 27th @ 6:30 PM
📍 Herman Brown Free Library
100 E. Washington St., Burnet, TX 78611
(Enter through the Main Street side entrance)
Featured Speaker: Reno Lamb — an expert in groundwater conservation and rainwater harvesting. Even though our lakes are currently full, Reno will share how vital it is that we continue to be responsible stewards of our groundwater resources.

2. Groundwater and Recycling Awareness
Today’s Highlander newspaper featured a full-page flyer on the Burnet County Recycling Program, emphasizing how critical groundwater is to Texans. Click Here and scroll down for a copy of the flyer.
It raises an important question:
If our groundwater is so precious, why are state officials allowing an industrial rock crusher to use millions of gallons per month—while CTGCD asks residents to conserve?
This is a question worth asking at the next CTGCD meeting.
For your reference, the CTGCD Board of Directors are:

Paul King – Director
Kathy Griffis-Bailey – Secretary/Treasurer
Ryan Rowney – President
Ceferino “Reno” Lamb – Director, Precinct 3
Ricky Bindseil – Vice President

Stay Strong and Stay Engaged
Your voices, letters, and presence continue to make an impact. Each message you send and each meeting you attend reminds decision-makers that the community of Burnet County will not stay silent while our natural resources and state parks are threatened.

Together, we will keep pushing forward — protecting our water, our parks, and our Hill Country way of life.
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 71 - our new billboard and the fight for burnet's water

10/17/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We’re excited to share some great news — our new billboard is up and shining bright!

You can see it on Highway 29, just as you leave Bertram heading toward Liberty Hill and Austin.
The fully lighted billboard proudly reminds everyone that we are still fighting to stop the proposed rock crusher on Hoover Valley Road (FM 3509) in Burnet County.

This is a major milestone for our campaign — a visible sign of our united effort to protect the Hill Country, our state parks, and our water supply.

The Current Situation
Burnet Ranch Investments (also known as Asphalt Inc.) has already drilled three deep wells, roughly 650 feet into the Hickory Aquifer, right off FM 3509. The proposed rock crushing facility could require millions of gallons of water every month just to control dust.
Our residents, ranchers, and local businesses all depend on this same water source.
With Burnet County still under watering restrictions and little rain for nearly two months, we simply cannot afford to let a commercial rock crusher drain our precious aquifers.

How You Can Help
We need your voice!
Please take a few minutes to send a short, polite email to the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) expressing your concern about groundwater use for the proposed rock crushing facility.
CTGCD’s mission is simple but vital:
“To manage and protect Burnet County’s groundwater through responsible conservation, monitoring, and regulation—ensuring a sustainable, high-quality water supply for current and future generations.”
Your message can be brief — just tell them you oppose granting permits that would allow a rock crushing facility to use millions of gallons of groundwater while residents are being asked to conserve.

Where to Send Your Message
Please email all five CTGCD Board Members and CC the General Manager, Mitchell Sodek.
Board Emails:

CC:

Mitchell Sodek, General Manager – [email protected]

Mitchell and his team work out of the CTGCD office on the square in downtown Burnet and have been very helpful in listening to community concerns. If you have questions, feel free to stop by or call their office.

Together, We Make a Difference
Your support is invaluable. Every letter, every message, every donation makes a real impact.
Please visit SaveBurnet.com for more details, updates, supporting information for writing your letters and donation options.
Stay strong, stay united, and keep fighting to protect our Hill Country.
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 70 - protect our water: speak up to ctgcd

10/10/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

The fight to protect our community, our water, and our Hill Country heritage continues. We want to share an important update and ask for your help once again.

Groundwater Testing Update

Burnet Ranch Investments (also known as Asphalt Inc., LLC) has recently completed drawdown testing on two of its newly drilled wells. Each well is approximately 650 feet deep and most likely taps into the Hickory Aquifer—a critical groundwater source for Burnet County residents, ranchers, and local businesses.

The drawdown test typically runs 24–48 hours continuously to measure how much water a well can produce (in gallons per minute, or GPM) and how this affects surrounding wells. The results of this testing will be included in the hydrology report that helps determine the potential long-term impact on our aquifers.

We are encouraged that the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) has been diligent and engaged throughout this process. The district has placed five monitoring wells around the test sites to track changes in groundwater levels. These wells are located adjacent to, or in close proximity to, the proposed rock crusher site on Hoover Valley Road.
CTGCD will review all of this data and decide whether Burnet Ranch Investments’ water permit should be approved, amended, or denied.

About CTGCD and Its Authority

The CTGCD Board oversees all of Burnet County’s groundwater management. Their responsibilities and powers include:

Adopting and enforcing rules under Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code.
Issuing, denying, or amending well permits and regulating groundwater production.
Requiring well registration and water use reporting.
Managing groundwater monitoring and conservation programs.
Holding public hearings and voting on permit applications.

(You can learn more at www.central texas gcd.org)

Why Your Voice Matters

Now is the time for every Burnet County resident to speak up.

We ask that you write or email the CTGCD Board to express your concern about granting a groundwater permit to Burnet Ranch Investments (Asphalt Inc.).
Your message can be simple but powerful:

Thank the board members for their service.
Express your concern for the Hickory Aquifer and your local water supply.
Remind them that the proposed rock crushing facility could use up to millions of gallons of groundwater per month—a burden our community cannot sustain.
Ask why CTGCD continues to post “Water Conservation Required” signs for residents while considering a permit that would allow industrial-scale pumping.
Request that they deny the groundwater permit for Burnet Ranch Investments (Asphalt Inc., LLC).

Please include your name, address, and contact information in your letter or email so the board recognizes you as a concerned local resident.
👉 Click Here for the List of CTGCD Board Members and Contact Information
(Available on the https://www.saveburnet.com/take-action.html website under the Take Action section.)

Stay United and Stay Engaged

We are not done yet. Once the hydrology report is released, SaveBurnet.com will share a detailed analysis and next steps.
Until then, please:
✅ Write to CTGCD.
✅ Encourage friends, neighbors, and family to get involved.
✅ Visit SaveBurnet.com to sign up for updates and donate to keep this fight going.

Together, we are making a difference. Thank you for your continued dedication and for standing strong for the future of Burnet County.

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 69 - letters + Well testing - our fight continues

9/26/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

Thank you for continuing to stand strong with us in this long fight. Every effort you make adds strength to our cause, and your voices are making a difference.

Why Writing to Governor Abbott Matters

In Update #68, we asked you to send letters to Governor Greg Abbott through his official website portal. Many of you have already written, and some of you have received responses referring you back to TCEQ, LCRA, or your State Representative.
This is normal and expected. Do not let these replies discourage you. The key is persistence: the more letters Governor Abbott’s office receives, the more he and his advisors will recognize the depth of community concern. This is how we keep the pressure on and ensure our voices are heard at the very top level.

👉 Governor’s Contact Page: Click Here to Access

Fill in all required fields (marked with an *).
Keep your letter under 500 words.
Focus on one clear topic per letter.
Be polite, firm, and specific about what action you want the Governor to take.

Groundwater Well Testing – Round Two

Meanwhile, Asphalt Inc. (also known as Burnet Ranch Investments) will be attempting their second round of groundwater well testing on September 29th. These tests are designed to determine:

How many gallons per minute (GPM) the test wells can produce.
What impacts this pumping may have on surrounding residents, ranchers, and the local water table.

The LCRA will be monitoring this testing and reviewing the hydrology report that follows. Once the report is released, we will carefully review the findings and provide a full update so our community understands the potential impacts.

Stay Strong, Stay United

This is a long fight, and it will take persistence. Together, we have already built an incredible movement and made our voices heard in powerful ways. Please continue to support SaveBurnet.com — with your letters, your donations, and your steady resolve.
We are not backing down. With your support, we will protect our state parks, our water, and our community.

One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 68 - please write to governor abbott

9/12/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

Thank you for continuing to stand strong with us. Our fight to protect Inks Lake State Park, Longhorn Caverns State Park, and Camp Longhorn youth camp from the proposed rock crushing facility is far from over. The next step in our campaign is critical: we need Governor Abbott to hear directly from YOU.

Governor Abbott has the authority to stop or delay this rock crushing quarry until he knows it is safe for the adjacent youth camp and our precious state parks. Writing to him now ensures he understands the risks this facility poses to our state parks, our community, and our children. The more letters he receives, the clearer it becomes that Texans will not allow this facility to harm our natural treasures and youth camp.

How to Submit Your Letter

Please use Governor Abbott’s official website portal to send your message:
👉 Click Here to Access the Governor’s Contact Page

Instructions:

Fill in all required fields (*marked with an asterisk).
Select the topic that best matches your concern.
Keep your letter under 500 words.
Focus on one key topic per letter. If you can, send a different topic each week.

What to Include in Your Letter

Thank Governor Abbott for his leadership and commitment to keeping Texas strong.
Politely but firmly request his personal help in this urgent matter.
Note if you have written before and only received a referral to other agencies — which did not resolve your concerns.
Clearly state what action you want him to take.

Examples of Requests:

Require additional environmental studies before Asphalt Inc. can receive new permits.
Investigate TCEQ’s decision to deny three Motions to Overturn, despite its own Office of Public Interest Counsel recommending approval.
Block blasting activity so close to Camp Longhorn youth camp.
Ensure TCEQ works directly with TPWD’s Environmental Review Team and releases their findings.
Support new legislation to protect state parks and youth camps from industrial encroachment.

Sample Topics for Your Letters

1. Lack of Air Monitoring in Burnet County

No baseline air quality data was collected before TCEQ issued the permit.
There are already 18+ APO/Rock Crushing sites in Burnet County, yet the nearest monitor is 40 miles away.
Without proper monitoring, TCEQ cannot fulfill its mission to protect public health and natural resources.

2. Mishandled TCEQ Public Meeting (Dec. 2024)

Over 5,000 written objections and 850 attendees — yet TCEQ cut speaking time without notice and left many questions unanswered.
Asphalt Inc. refused to address water use and blasting concerns.
This was the largest public response TCEQ has ever received, yet community voices were disregarded.

3. Inadequate TCEQ Responses to Public Concerns

Thousands of objections were reduced to 17 vague “answers.”
Most responses fell into four dismissive categories: Not Our Authority, Cost Prohibitive, Report It Yourself, or Trust the Process.
Governor Abbott should require TCEQ to rescind this permit until real answers are provided.

4. Threat to Camp Longhorn Youth Camp

Camp Longhorn has served 2,000 children every summer for 50+ years.
Blasting could spook horses and endanger the lives of youth campers.
Open-air cabins will expose children to harmful dust.
Allowing a rock crusher next to a youth camp is far more dangerous than one located near a school.
Urge Governor Abbott to prohibit blasting so close to a youth camp.

Why Your Letter Matters
Governor Abbott has the power to influence this fight. Your letters show him that Texans care deeply about protecting their natural heritage, their children, and their water resources. Together, our voices can ensure he and his advisors understand the urgency of stopping this project.

Call to Action
Please write your letter this week and encourage friends and family to join you. Every message counts.
Together, we will protect the Hill Country.
One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 67 - thank you for your letters - tpwd & Governor abbott are listening

8/29/2025:

Dear Friends and Supporters,

Thank you to everyone who submitted letters to Governor Abbott’s office and to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) Commissioners. Because of your efforts, both TPWD and the Governor’s office have formally responded. Many of you should have already received reply letters. For those who haven’t, we’ve attached sample copies here and posted them on the SaveBurnet.com website.

The reason we continue writing to Governor Abbott is simple: he must be aware of the imposing danger this proposed Rock Crushing facility poses to our two state treasures--Inks Lake State Park and Longhorn Caverns State Park—as well as to Camp Longhorn youth camp, which would literally share a fence line with the Rock Crushing facility.

Governor Abbott personally appointed all the TPWD Commissioners. If the Governor requires additional information, it is likely that he will turn to these commissioners for guidance. That is why it was so important for our community’s concerns to be documented and voiced—and thanks to you, we accomplished that.

On August 20th, hundreds of letters were received and dozens of speakers—including many of our SaveBurnet.com supporters—presented their testimony directly to TPWD. This was an important milestone in our process, and one we could not have achieved without your help.

Right now, our state officials are focused on implementing new laws that address the devastating natural disasters Texas has faced this year. Once those urgent matters stabilize, we will begin the next phase: a renewed letter campaign and trips to the Capitol to ensure our voices continue to be heard where decisions are made.

Until then, please stay strong, remain engaged, and keep supporting SaveBurnet.com. We have not given up—and neither should you. Together, we will protect our parks, our water, and our community.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 66 - recognizing lbca & Wayne Shipley's powerful voice against the rock crusher

8/24/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

In our last update, we shared the success of the TPWD meeting on August 20th and gave thanks to those who spoke on behalf of our community. However, I unintentionally left out one very important voice.

🎤 Wayne Shipley’s Compelling RemarksAt 6:09 on the YouTube video scroll bar, you can hear a strong and compelling statement from Wayne Shipley, President of the Lake Buchanan Community Alliance (LBCA). For those of you who may not know Wayne or LBCA: Click Here for YouTube video of the TPWD meeting.

LBCA is a well-run organization made up of property owners’ associations, small businesses, civic groups, and individuals throughout the Highland Lakes area.
Their combined membership represents the majority of residents around Lake Buchanan, as well as members from Inks Lake, Lake LBJ, and Lake Travis.
LBCA has been a steadfast partner and a great supporter of SaveBurnet.com, working tirelessly to help stop the proposed rock crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road.

We are grateful for Wayne’s leadership and for the strength of LBCA in standing united with us.

📅 Upcoming LBCA MeetingLBCA meets once a month, and their meetings are open to the public. We encourage our supporters to attend and stay informed.

Next Meeting:
📍 Lakeshore Library
7346 RR 261
Buchanan Dam, Texas 78609
🗓 Monday, August 25th @ 6:30 PM
For more information about LBCA, please visit their website: https://www.lb-ca.org/

💚 Closing
Together, with strong community voices like Wayne’s and organizations like LBCA, we are building the momentum needed to protect our state parks and community. Thank you all for your continued dedication and support.

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 65 - strong showing at the tpwd meeting!

8/22/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

On August 20th, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) held their public meeting, and our community was well represented.

💌 Written Comments
Our supporters mailed in approximately 100 comments to TPWD commissioners, each highlighting the risks the proposed rock crusher poses to Longhorn Caverns State Park and Inks Lake State Park. These thoughtful letters made it clear that Texans care deeply about protecting these natural treasures. Special thanks to all of you who mailed in your comments.

🎤 In-Person Testimony
SaveBurnet.com also sent a delegation of about 15 members to the meeting. Many distinguished individuals spoke powerfully on behalf of the community, including:

Dr. Jim Baran
Doug Golding
Nan Manning
Clyde Goodenough
Larry Black
Fermin Ortiz

We thank them for their leadership and strong voices in defense of our state parks.

🎥 Watch the Meeting
The full TPWD meeting was recorded and is available online. It was a lengthy session, but you can skip to 5:26, where our SaveBurnet.com team began presenting comments and data.

👉 Click Here to Watch the Recorded TPWD Meeting

🚩 What’s Nex
tIn the coming weeks, we will be asking all of you to continue the email campaign—this time to Governor Abbott and the EPA. These next steps will be critical in making sure our concerns are heard at the highest levels.

Until then, please stay strong and stay engaged. Together, we can stop this rock crushing facility from devastating our state parks and beloved community.

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 64 - keep your letters moving forward!

8/16/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

In our last update (#63), we asked that you email the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commissioners and CC the following state officials:

Governor Greg Abbott – [email protected]
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick – [email protected]
Attorney General Ken Paxton – [email protected]
Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham – [email protected]
Representative Ellen Troxclair – [email protected]
Representative Terry Wilson – [email protected]
Senator Pete Flores – [email protected]

Unfortunately, we are running into the same issue we faced a few months ago: emails to Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, and Attorney General Ken Paxton often bounce back as non-deliverable (75–90% of the time).

If you received a kickback notice, please take one of these alternate steps to ensure your message still reaches them:

Governor Greg Abbott – Submit your comments via USPS mail or through his official website portal → Click Here.
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick – Submit by USPS mail or through his official website portal → Click Here.
Attorney General Ken Paxton – Submit by USPS mail or call the number listed on his official site → Click Here.

✅ Action Reminder: If your email bounced, don’t stop there—please use one of these official channels so your voice is still heard!

Together, we are showing our leaders that the proposed rock crushing plant near Inks Lake and Longhorn Caverns is unacceptable. Thank you for taking the time to send your letters and for following through when obstacles like this arise.
Stay strong, stay united, and let’s keep the pressure on.

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 63 - urgent: your voice needed at tpwd meeting - protect our state parks

8/12/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We are continuing to work closely with our state representatives and senators, as well as making Governor Greg Abbott’s office fully aware of the dangers the proposed Rock Crusher poses to Inks Lake State Park, Longhorn Caverns State Park, and the National Fish Hatchery downstream from potential contaminated runoff.

If Governor Abbott is to make a factual decision, he will rely on input and guidance from his advisors and commissions—including the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). That’s why we need your help now.
The TPWD Commissioners must hear directly from the community about how this rock crushing facility could devastate our state parks. Please take a few minutes to send a physical letter, email, or—if possible—attend the upcoming TPWD meeting in person.

TPWD Meeting Information:

Dates: August 20–21, 2025
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Rd., Austin, TX 78744
Public Comment: August 20 at 2:00 PM
Rules: You will have 3 minutes to present. If submitting materials, bring 15 copies and arrive at least 1 hour before the start time.
TPWD Rules for Comments: Available on SaveBurnet.com "Take Action Tab"

Please send your letters by Friday, August 15 so the commissioners have time to read them.
If emailing, send to: [email protected] — she will distribute your letter to the commissioners.

Key Concerns to Include in Your Letter:

The proposed facility is less than 3 miles from Longhorn Caverns and Inks Lake State Parks—blasting vibrations threaten cave structures and visitor safety.
Dust, noise, and light pollution will degrade the visitor experience, hiking trails, and campgrounds.
Contaminated stormwater runoff could harm aquatic life and ecosystems at the National Fish Hatchery.
Potential negative impact on tourism and local businesses that rely on the parks’ pristine environment.
Air quality concerns—TCEQ’s air permit allows significant particulate matter emissions without adequate nearby monitoring stations.
The site is within a short distance of a children’s summer camp—posing health risks to youth.
In September 2024, TPWD’s own Director of State Parks submitted a letter opposing this facility.
After TCEQ approved the air permit, three Motions to Overturn were filed. TCEQ’s own Office of Public Interest Counsel recommended overturning the permit, citing flawed emissions data and inadequate modeling—yet the TCEQ Commission voted against their own legal counsel’s advice.

Email Template / Example You Can Use:
To: [email protected]
CC:

Governor Greg Abbott – [email protected]
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick – [email protected]
Attorney General Ken Paxton – [email protected]
Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham - [email protected]
Representative Ellen Troxclair – [email protected]
Representative Terry Wilson – [email protected]
Senator Pete Flores – [email protected]

Subject: Urgent: Protect Our State Parks – Oppose Proposed Rock Crusher Near Inks Lake & Longhorn Caverns
Body:
Dear TPWD Commissioners,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Asphalt Inc. rock crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road in Burnet, Texas. This site’s proximity to Longhorn Caverns State Park, Inks Lake State Park, and the National Fish Hatchery poses unacceptable risks to our environment, public health, and local economy.
[In your own words insert 2–3 bullet points from the Key Concerns list above.]
I urge TPWD to stand with our community, protect our state parks, and oppose this facility.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]

Let’s stay strong, stay united, and keep pushing forward. Together, we can protect the beauty and integrity of our Texas Hill Country for generations to come.
Visit SaveBurnet.com website "Take Action Tab" for supporting information & Documents.

Warm thanks,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 62 - well monitoring data & ongoing efforts to stop the rock crusher

8/8/2025:

Dear Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

We wanted to share important new information regarding the water impact of the proposed Rock Crusher on FM 3509. Please take a few minutes to review the attached PDF, which provides detailed maps, well locations, and monitoring data from the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD).

Key Highlights:

Two monitored wells are now in place along FM 3509 — one on the San Saba Aquifer (#2568) and one on the Hickory Aquifer (#3737).
In the past six years, Well #2568’s water level has dropped about 30 feet — with 8 feet of that drop occurring in just the last 12 months.
The proposed rock crusher facility could require up to 9.7 million gallons of groundwater per month for dust abatement alone.
Three test/production wells have already been drilled, but even at maximum output they would fall short of the water needs stated in the Air Quality permit. Additional wells would be required.
CTGCD is installing monitors on additional wells within a 2,500-foot radius of the production wells to produce hydrology reports and assess the project’s impact on local water supply.

As the presentation shows, our groundwater levels remain critically low, and many wells along FM 3509 are already dry or near dry. The July flooding filled the lakes, but it did little to nothing for our groundwater table.

We will share the results of the hydrology reports as soon as they become available.

We are still fighting hard on multiple fronts to stop Asphalt Inc. from operating this facility. Over the next few weeks, we’ll share more about our ongoing initiatives
.
If you can, please donate to help us continue the fight — details are available on the SaveBurnet.com website. If you can’t donate, you can still help by getting friends and family to sign up for our weekly newsletter at SaveBurnet.com.
Stay strong. Stay together. Keep supporting the cause.

– The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 61 - volunteer opportunity - help our flood-affected neighbors

7/19/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com supporters,

Our State Representative, Ellen Troxclair, has been an incredible ally in our fight—now she’s asking for our help in a different way: flood relief. Many areas of Burnet are still recovering from recent floods, and Ellen’s organizing a volunteer cleanup this Tuesday, July 22nd. Let’s show our appreciation by stepping up and helping where it’s needed most.

🛠️ How You Can Help
📅 Date: Tuesday, July 22
⏰ Time: Briefing begins at 8 AM, followed by deployment to work areas
👕 Wear: Your green SaveBurnet T-shirt (if you don’t have one, let us know—we’ll get you one)
👟 Bring: Closed-toed shoes and, if possible, supplies (see sign-up link for details)
📍 Sign up here: [Click Here for sign-up sheet]
Last cleanup saw 80 volunteers from across our region—let’s beat that number! Invite your friends, neighbors, church groups—anyone who wants to help.

💬 Message from Rep. Troxclair
Dear Friends,
Thank you. The past few weeks have been exhausting and inspiring. Our lakes are full, but our hearts still ache as we mourn and help those who’ve lost so much.
In the Hill Country, we've come together—in prayer, work, and donations—to support our flooded neighbors. New friendships have formed, reminding us we are all in this together.
Let’s keep it up. The work is ongoing, and compassion doesn’t end when the waters recede.
Volunteer with me this Tuesday, July 22nd, in Burnet. We’ll meet at 8 AM to deploy in teams—removing debris, disinfecting, demo-ing damaged areas, and restoring homes.
Please wear closed-toed shoes and, if you can, bring donated supplies.
Let’s show the Hill Country's resilience and kindness—together.
See my Facebook page for updates and volunteer details.
Rainbow over Kerrville—God's promise shines after the storm.

Why This Matters

Community-strengthening: This is our chance to give back and support those who supported us.
Solidarity: Wearing our SaveBurnet green shows unity—not just for our cause, but for the people behind it.
Team-building: Working together reinforces the bonds that fuel our fight to protect the Hill Country.

✅ What You Can Do Now

Sign up via the link above.
Spread the word—share the link with friends, family, and groups.
Wear green on Tuesday to show we're united in BOTH disaster response and environmental protection.

🌟 In Closing
Ellen Troxclair has stood by SaveBurnet.com—this is our chance to stand by her and our community. Let’s bring the same passion and energy we bring to the rock crusher fight to flood relief. Together, we can lift each other up—one cleanup at a time.
Stay strong, stay compassionate, and see you Tuesday in green.

With gratitude and hope,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 60 - flood risks, permits, and what's ahead

7/14/2025:

Dear SaveBurnet.com Family,

We've just released an important presentation summarizing recent Texas flood events and how agencies like LCRA and TCEQ have still approved permits in flood‑sensitive areas. Here are the key takeaways:

🌊 Highlights from the Presentation

Record Rainfall & Floodgate Releases
Central Texas has experienced significant flooding recently, prompting LCRA to open floodgates at Wirtz and Starcke Dams to manage swollen rivers https://www.dailytrib.com/2025/07/14/buchanan-dam-floodgates-open-for-first-time-since-2019/Flood Gates Open.

Permits Issued in Flood Zones
Despite these high-water events, LCRA and TCEQ approved permits—including those for rock quarry operations—within sensitive watershed areas, highlighting gaps in their flood-risk assessments.
Stormwater Runoff Threats
Uncontrolled runoff from such operations could carry sediment, diesel, contaminants, and fine particulates into Peters Creek, Spring Creek, Lake LBJ, Inks Lake, and sensitive karst-fed aquifers. Our region’s fragile karst systems are especially vulnerable to rapid contaminant infiltration.

📣 What You Can Do

Read the short presentation (attached) for detailed insights on recent floods and permit implications.
Stay engaged—we have several initiatives underway to prevent Asphalt Inc. from moving forward:
- Ongoing actions related to the permits from LCRA, CTGCD, TxDOT, TPWD, and other State Agencies.
- Groundwater well testing on FM 3509.
- Preparing for legal action if asphalt quarrying proceeds unchecked.
Support the cause—every donation helps sustain our fight. Visit SaveBurnet.com to donate, or if you can’t, please encourage family and friends to sign up for updates on our website.

🙌 Stay United, Stay Strong
We are far from defeated. This community response—standing together, informed, and empowered—is exactly what will protect our Hill Country home. Our work continues, and with your commitment, the future is bright.
Additionally our local media outlets have done a great job of continuing to highlight the dangers of the proposed and how it may affect our beautiful state parks and highland lakes.

Stay strong—stay unified. Together, we will prevail.
Warm thanks,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 59 - protecting our water: well monitoring data + what's next

7/11/2025:

💧 Well Monitoring Presentation Summary

We recently posted to SaveBurnet.com a detailed presentation outlining our groundwater monitoring strategy. The presentation is attached and it can also be accessed on our website by Clicking Here.

Here are the key highlights:

Cooperation with Central Texas GCD
We’ve partnered with the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District to install dedicated monitoring wells near the proposed FM 3509 quarry site. One well is already active in the Ellenburger aquifer, and a second—deeper into the Hickory aquifer—is coming online soon.
Why this matters
Both the Ellenburger and Hickory aquifers supply drinking water to residents across Burnet County. The karst geology in this area makes it especially vulnerable to contamination from surface runoff—particularly near quarry activity.
Real-time tracking & data collection
Central Texas GCD operates a network of 50+ monitoring wells using pressure transducers and quarterly manual readings to build accurate hydrographs and identify long-term trends.
Regional aquifer status
Recent reports show that aquifers in Burnet County—such as Hickory and Ellenburger—have dropped to near-record low water levels. This underscores the urgency to monitor and protect our underground water resources now more than ever.

🔍 What You Can Do Now

Download and review the full presentation (attached). It includes maps, charts, and a comprehensive analysis.
Reach out if you’re interested in assisting with future monitoring efforts—more wells may be added in strategic locations.
Help spread the word: Forward this update to friends and family, and encourage them to sign up for our newsletter via SaveBurnet.com.

🔜 What’s Next?
Over the coming weeks, we’ll introduce several new initiatives aimed at preventing Asphalt Inc. from establishing a rock quarry on FM 3509. You’ll be the first to hear when they launch.

🤝 We Need Your Support
If you're able, please consider making a donation—every dollar helps fund monitoring, research, and legal defense efforts. Information on how to donate is available on the SaveBurnet.com website. Can’t donate? No problem—please invite friends and family to subscribe to our newsletter and stay informed.

✊ Stay Strong, Stay United
We’ve still got plenty of fight ahead. This monitoring work is a vital layer in our long-term strategy to protect the Texas Hill Country—and together, we will prevail.

Stay strong, stay together, and keep supporting.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 58 - important news & our next steps

6/19/2025:

1) LCRA's Decision on Asphalt Inc.

By now, many of you have received the LCRA email/letter dated June 18, 2025, confirming that more than 2,000 public comments were reviewed, and despite concerns, LCRA has approved the quarry/mine permit. While this is a disappointment, it does not derail our mission.

👉 What’s next?
We are now intensifying our focus on the remaining critical permit processes:

Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD): We are monitoring local wells near FM 3509 and engaging the District to challenge groundwater impacts.
TXDOT, TPWD & Federal Fish Hatchery Discussions: We are in talks with each about traffic, wildlife, and environmental protections.
Legal Readiness: Should Asphalt Inc. secure all permits, we are prepared to file a misrepresentation lawsuit in Burnet County.

We remain committed to doing all we can—by all means possible—to stop this project.

2) Keeping the Momentum

Our team is working hard behind the scenes—gathering data, honing legal strategies, and preparing for every avenue of defense.
Supports like yours—through staying informed, donating, and spreading the word—keep this movement alive and strong.

💚 Stay Strong… We’re In It for the Long Haul
Though LCRA’s decision is not what we’d hoped, it hasn’t shaken our resolve. We have a multi-front plan and a dedicated team ready to fight at every turn. Even if Asphalt Inc. obtains all permits, we’ll challenge them in court.

Your ongoing involvement truly matters—we’re building something powerful together. If you can, please donate via our GoFundMe or mail a check to SaveBurnet.com to help cover legal and monitoring efforts.
👉 Click here to visit our website & learn how to give

Thank you for staying engaged, supporting our mission, and believing that, united, we can protect Burnet County.

With gratitude and hope,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 57 - strategic patience pays off

6/16/25

Hi friends,

We’ve had many inquiries lately: “When will LCRA make their decision?”
We want you to rest easy—this is good news, not cause for concern.
Why slower is better:

🔍 Thorough review: LCRA’s Application Review & Response Program (ARRP) is conducting a detailed technical evaluation under the Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance saveburnet.com lcra.org+6lcra.org+6lcra.org+6.
💪 We want delay: The more time LCRA takes to scrutinize stormwater runoff and contamination risks, the better for our strategy.
⏳ No rush: A decision in 2026—or even 2027—gives us more time to gather data, build support, and influence outcomes.

What we’re doing now:

Providing critical information to all relevant permitting agencies
Monitoring future permits (LCRA, CTGCD, TxDOT, etc.)
Preparing for legal options if Asphalt Inc. gets all necessary approvals

✅ Your Role:

Stay updated--no need to call LCRA, we’ve got it covered
Continue supporting and donating to fuel our ongoing efforts
Keep bringing awareness--your voice matters

We are in this for the long haul. If Asphalt Inc. pushes forward with permits, we are fully prepared to challenge them at every turn—even if that means going to court. We’ve got a strong team, community support, and unwavering resolve.

Thank you for your continued support—stay strong, stay involved, and let’s keep protecting our Texas Hill Country together.

— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 56 - we're still in the fight

6/13/25

Dear Friends,

You might have noticed a bit less messaging from us this week—but don’t worry! The SaveBurnet.com team is still hard at work behind the scenes and busy planning our next moves to protect the Hill Country.

1️⃣ Waiting on LCRA Decision
We’re currently in the home stretch waiting for the LCRA’s ruling on Asphalt Inc’s water runoff permit. As of now, no decision has been released, and LCRA has indicated it’ll take a few more weeks before we hear back.

2️⃣ More Permits Still Needed
Asphalt Inc still must secure additional permits before any operations can begin—this includes permits from the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD).
We’re already working closely with CTGCD:

A monitoring well on the Ellenburger group, off FM 3509, is actively being tracked.
Within the next week, a second well in the Hickory Aquifer, located directly across from the proposed rock crushing site, will be added to the monitoring network.

This groundwater monitoring is essential—we’ll be able to document any impacts to our precious water supply before anything happens.

3️⃣ Ready for What Comes Next
If, against all odds, every agency approves Asphalt Inc’s permits—including water, air, and other critical reviews—we’re fully prepared to move forward with legal action. We won’t let this project proceed unchecked, no matter what hurdles we face.

💪 In Closing

We haven’t gone quiet—we’re simply working diligently behind the curtain.
LCRA’s decision and CTGCD’s monitoring are key right now.
If all else fails, we’re ready to defend our community through the courts.

Thank you for your dedication and support.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
"One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It."
Have a wonderful weekend. Stay strong, stay engaged, and continue supporting SaveBurnet.com

update 55 - staying the course - our fight continues

6/6/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We want to reassure you that, despite a recent lull in communications, our commitment to protecting the Texas Hill Country remains unwavering. Our team is diligently working behind the scenes, strategizing and preparing for the next phases of our advocacy.

Awaiting LCRA's Decision
Currently, we are awaiting a decision from the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) regarding Asphalt Inc.'s permit application for a proposed rock quarry near Inks Lake State Park and Camp Longhorn. The LCRA is conducting a thorough technical review to assess the potential impact on water quality in the Highland Lakes area. As of now, no decision has been made, and we do not anticipate one for several weeks. dailytrib.com

Multiple Permits Still Required
Even if the LCRA approves the permit, Asphalt Inc. must still obtain additional approvals from other agencies, including the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District and the Texas Department of Transportation. Each of these permits presents an opportunity for public input and scrutiny.

Prepared for Legal Action
Should all permits be granted, we are prepared to challenge the approvals through legal channels. Our legal team is ready to advocate for the protection of our environment and community.

Your Continued Support Matters
Your involvement is crucial. Here's how you can help:

Stay Informed: Visit SaveBurnet.com for the latest updates and resources.
Donate: Contributions help fund our ongoing efforts, including potential legal challenges.
Spread the Word: Share information with friends, family, and neighbors to raise awareness.

Together, we have achieved significant milestones, and together, we will continue to fight for the preservation of our natural treasures.
Thank you for your dedication and support.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
"One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It."

update 54 - our commitment to protecting the texas hill country

5/29/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We continue to stand united in our mission to protect the Texas Hill Country from the proposed rock crusher near our cherished state parks. While we await the Lower Colorado River Authority's (LCRA) decision on the stormwater permit, our efforts persist on multiple fronts.

Engaging State Leadership
We are actively reaching out to the following key state officials to ensure they are informed about our concerns:

Governor - Greg Abbott
Lieutenant - Governor Dan Patrick
Attorney General - Ken Paxton
Land Commissioner - Dawn Buckingham

Continuing the Fight
Our commitment remains unwavering. We are:

Monitoring the LCRA's review process and providing additional information as needed.
Engaging with other agencies responsible for issuing necessary permits to Asphalt Inc.
Preparing for potential legal actions should all permits be granted.

Stay Involved
Your support is crucial. Here's how you can help:

Stay Informed: Visit SaveBurnet.com for the latest updates and resources.
Donate: Contributions help fund our ongoing efforts, including potential legal challenges.
Spread the Word: Share information with friends, family, and neighbors to raise awareness.

update 53 - Hb 5151 - what happened, what's next, and how we keep fighting

5/24/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We want to express our deepest gratitude for your unwavering support and dedication throughout our efforts to pass House Bill 5151. While the bill did not advance this session, our collective voice has made a significant impact, and our mission to protect the Texas Hill Country remains steadfast.

🏛️ What Happened to HB 5151?
On May 15, 2025, HB 5151 reached its second reading in the Texas House. Two points of order were raised by Representative Terry Canales of District 40:

First Point of Order: Claimed the bill's caption did not provide proper notice regarding taxes or fees and that it was impermissibly limited to certain political subdivisions. This point was withdrawn.
Second Point of Order: Argued that the committee substitute was not germane to the original bill because it broadened the scope from "mines, quarries, or rock crushing facilities" to "facilities used for the production or crushing of aggregates." This point was sustained, and the bill was returned to the Calendars Committee, effectively halting its progress.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: Is HB 5151 dead? Can it be revised and brought up again?
A1: HB 5151 is effectively dead for this legislative session. The next regular session is not until 2027.
Q2: What is a Point of Order?
A2: A point of order is a parliamentary procedure used to object to a violation of the rules. It can halt proceedings until the issue is resolved. In this case, the sustained point of order was based on the argument that the bill's scope had been impermissibly broadened.
Q3: Why would a representative from 300 miles away oppose HB 5151?
A3: The specific motivations are unclear. However, it's worth noting that Representative Canales has received significant campaign contributions from construction-related political action committees.
Q4: Did Asphalt Inc. or its parent company donate to Representative Canales?
A4: As of now, there is no record of donations from Asphalt Inc. or Construction Partners Inc. to Representative Canales. We will continue to monitor campaign finance disclosures.

🌊 LCRA Stormwater Permit Update
The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) is still reviewing comments related to Asphalt Inc.'s stormwater permit application. We appreciate everyone who voiced their concerns. To further illustrate the uncontrollable nature of stormwater runoff at the proposed site, please visit SaveBurnet.com and scroll to the bottom to view photos of runoff from Peters Creek. These images demonstrate the potential for silt and contaminants to flow into Inks Lake and Lake LBJ during heavy rains.

🔗 New Resource: Website Links PageWe've added a new "Website Links" page on SaveBurnet.com to provide quick access to:

State agencies
Air quality maps
Quarry locations
Partner organizations

This resource is designed to help you stay informed and engaged.

💪 The Fight Continues
While HB 5151's journey has ended for now, our mission to protect the Texas Hill Country is far from over. Asphalt Inc. still requires multiple permits, including approvals from the LCRA, Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District, and the Texas Department of Transportation. We will continue to oppose these permits and, if necessary, pursue legal action.
Our community's strength lies in our unity and determination. Together, we will continue to fight to preserve the natural beauty and integrity of our region.
Thank you for your unwavering support.

— The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 52 - reflecting on hb5151 and charting our path forward

5/16/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

Last night, after extensive deliberation, House Bill 5151 reached its second reading in the Texas House. However, it was met with two points of order—procedural objections that led to the bill being returned to the Calendars Committee, effectively halting its progress this session.

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to State Representatives Terry Wilson and Ellen Troxclair for their unwavering commitment to protecting the Texas Hill Country. Their dedication and leadership have been instrumental in bringing HB 5151 to the forefront.

Our Path Forward
While this setback is disappointing, it does not deter our mission. Asphalt Inc. still requires several permits—including approvals from the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District, and the Texas Department of Transportation—before they can operate the proposed rock crusher.
Think of this as not even being halftime in a challenging game. The initial permit was just the beginning, and we're prepared for the long haul. Our strategy includes:

Monitoring Upcoming Permits: We'll stay vigilant on Asphalt Inc.'s applications and mobilize when public comments are needed.
Community Engagement: Continuing to raise awareness and gather support to protect our environment.
Legal Preparedness: If necessary, we're ready to pursue legal avenues to safeguard our community.

Our unity and determination have brought us this far, and together, we'll continue to stand strong for the Texas Hill Country.

Stay Connected
For updates and ways to get involved, visit SaveBurnet.com.
Thank you for your unwavering support.
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 51 - urgent call to action - sorry about the short notice

5/14/25

Thanks to your incredible efforts—over 1,000 phone calls and 5,000 green sheets submitted—House Bill 5151 has been unanimously advanced to the Texas House floor! This is a monumental achievement, and we couldn't have done it without your dedication.

Next Critical Step: Second Reading and Vote
HB 5151 is scheduled for its second reading today, May 14th. However, the House is currently running behind schedule, and the vote may occur late tonight or early tomorrow morning. This step is crucial for the bill's passage, and your immediate action is needed.

Action Required: Call Your Representatives
We urge every supporter of SaveBurnet.com to contact as many of the 150 Texas House Representatives as possible by midnight tonight. Express your strong support for HB 5151 and emphasize the importance of protecting our State Parks.

Suggested Message:
"Hello, my name is [Your Name], and my phone number is [Your Phone Number]. I fully support HB 5151 and urge you to vote in favor of it to protect our State Parks. Thank you."

How to Find Representative Contact Information:
You can find contact details for all Texas House Representatives at the official Texas House website:
👉 Texas House Members Directory

Tips for Calling:

Leave a Voicemail: If you reach an answering machine, please leave your message.
Be Polite and Concise: Clearly state your support for HB 5151 and the importance of protecting State Parks.
Call Multiple Representatives: The more calls made, the greater the impact.

Your voice matters, and your calls can make a significant difference in the passage of HB 5151. Let's continue to stand together to protect the natural beauty of the Texas Hill Country.
Thank you for your unwavering support.

— The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 50 - HB5151 advances & LCRA meeting tomorrow

5/12/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have two important updates to share:

1️⃣ HB 5151 Scheduled for Second Reading
House Bill 5151, championed by Representatives Terry Wilson and Ellen Troxclair, is scheduled for its second reading today, May 12, on the General State Calendar.
Due to a packed legislative agenda, the reading may occur later today or possibly tomorrow. Your continued support has been instrumental in advancing this bill.
Last Friday, we asked for your assistance in contacting members of the Calendars Committee and providing permission to include your name and phone number on green sheets supporting HB 5151. We're thrilled to report that over 1,000 calls were made, and more than 5,000 green sheets were generated and hand-delivered to all 11 committee members on Mother's Day, May 11. This remarkable effort showcases our community's dedication.

2️⃣ Reminder: LCRA Public Meeting – May 13The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) will host a come-and-go public meeting tomorrow:Click here for info.

Date: Tuesday, May 13
Time: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM
Location: Burnet County Community Center, 401 E. Jackson St., Burnet, TX

Attendees will have three minutes to provide comments at designated stations. Please be polite and thank LCRA for their service and note that LCRA's jurisdiction is limited to water quality issues related to stormwater runoff. Topics such as air quality, traffic, noise, or blasting are outside their purview.

Key Points for Your Comments:

Potential for sediment, diesel residue, and fine particulate matter entering nearby streams and tributaries, impacting Lake Buchanan and Inks Lake.
Erosion from stripped topsoil and blasting zones accelerating sediment deposition into creeks like Peter's Creek.
High-velocity runoff during flash floods due to impermeable surfaces at the crusher site, leading to increased downstream murkiness in the Colorado River.
Proximity to karst limestone formations allowing pollutants to enter the aquifer, contaminating drinking water supplies for wells and springs across Burnet County.

SaveBurnet.com will have tables set up outside the entrance to assist attendees. We'll provide information, answer questions, and have T-shirts available next to the donation box.

Thank You for Your Continued Support

Your unwavering commitment is making a significant difference. Together, we are working to protect our Texas Hill Country.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 49 - urgent action requested: support hb5151 by 1:00PM tomorrow (with correction)

5/9/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have a critical opportunity to advance House Bill 5151, which aims to protect our cherished Texas Hill Country from the adverse effects of rock crushers and aggregate production operations. The bill is currently under consideration by the Texas House Calendars Committee, and your immediate action can make a significant difference.

✅ Action 1: Grant Permission for Green Sheet SubmissionTo demonstrate widespread support for HB 5151, we are compiling a "Green Sheet"—a list of supporters' names and phone numbers—to hand-deliver to each of the 11 members of the Calendars Committee at the Capitol.

Here's how you can help:

Visit the SaveBurnet.com Contact Page:
SaveBurnet.com Contact Page
Provide Your Information:
- Name
- Phone Number
- Email Address
- Comments Section:
  Please include the following statement:
  "Yes, I give you permission to use my name and phone number to support HB 5151."
Submit by 1:00 PM on Saturday, May 10th:
To ensure your support is communicated effectively to the Capitol, please complete your submission by 1:00 PM on Saturday, May 10th.

📞 Action 2: Call Calendars Committee MembersIn addition to granting permission, we urge you to personally call each member of the Calendars Committee to express your support for HB 5151.

Suggested Message:
"Hello, my name is [Your Name], and I am a resident of [Your City/Town]. I am calling to express my strong support for House Bill 5151. I urge you to prioritize HB 5151 and place it on the calendar. Thank you for your time and service."

Calendars Committee Members:
Member Capitol - Phone
Rep.Todd Hunter (Chair) - (512) 463-0542
Rep. Toni Rose (Vice Chair) - (512) 463-0664
Rep. David Cook - (512) 463-0374
Rep. Charlie Geren - (512) 463-0610
Rep. Cole Hefner - (512) 463-0271
Rep. Ana Hernandez - (512) 463-0614
Rep. Ann Johnson - (512) 463-0389
Rep. Jared Patterson - (512) 463-0694
Rep. Shelby Slawson - (512) 463-0628
Rep. James Talarico - (512) 463-0670
Rep. Ed Thompson - (512) 463-0707

If the representative is unavailable, please leave a message or ask the person who answers to take down your information and relay it to the representative. You may call now till late Saturday night (May 10th).

Your prompt action is crucial. By completing these two steps, you contribute to the collective effort to safeguard our natural resources and quality of life in the Texas Hill Country.
Thank you for your continued support and dedication.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

5/9/25

Dear followers of SaveBurnet.com

I apologize for the additional emails. I promise this will be my last email tonight. If you are calling the list below should be correct.

Please use this list below highlighted in yellow with 3 corrections in Bold. Or use the link below.

Corrected contact list for Calendars Committee Members:

Member
Capitol Phone

Rep.Todd Hunter (Chair)
(512) 463-0672

Rep. Toni Rose (Vice Chair)
(512) 463-0664

Rep. Terry Canales
512-463-0426

Rep. Stan Gerdes
(512) 463-0682

Rep. Cody Harris
(512) 463-0730

Rep. Ana Hernandez
(512) 463-0614

Rep. Ann Johnson
(512) 463-0389

Rep. Jeff Leach
(512) 463-0544

Rep. Janie Lopez
(512) 463-0640

Rep. Ramon Romero
(512) 463-0740

Rep. Carl Tepper
(512) 463-0676

You may also refer to the official Texas House of Representatives website: Texas House Committee on Calendars

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”
SaveBurnet.com

update 48 - Stay the course: one hill country, one voice

5/6/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,

We have several important updates to share with you as we continue our collective fight to protect the heart of the Texas Hill Country. While we’ve encountered a setback, we’re also seeing meaningful legislative progress—and your continued dedication makes all the difference.

❌ Motion to Overturn (MTO) – Denied by Action of Law
We’re disappointed to report that all three Motions to Overturn (MTOs) related to TCEQ Air Quality Permit #176835 were overruled by action of law on May 1, 2025. This means the TCEQ Commissioners chose not to act within the required timeframe, effectively letting the motions expire without discussion or vote.

We are deeply grateful to Catherine Van Arnam from Rep. Ellen Troxclair’s office, who worked diligently to obtain and share an official statement from TCEQ with the SaveBurnet.com committee.

As a reminder:
🟢 This is the easiest permit Asphalt Inc. will face.
🟢 This setback does NOT change our plan.
🟢 We are in this for the long haul—together.

✅ Legislative Momentum – HB 5151 Moves Forward
We are pleased to share that Representative Terry Wilson’s House Bill 5151 is now co-authored by Rep. Ellen Troxclair and is officially on the legislative calendar. This bill would prohibit the construction and operation of rock crushers and APOs near sensitive areas like youth camps and state parks.

We are in daily contact with both Representative Wilson’s and Troxclair’s offices. Soon, we’ll ask for your help in calling the Capitol—but not just yet.

📞 Please hold off on calling state officials for now.

We will tell you whom to contact, and when to act to maximize our collective impact. Stay tuned!

🗓️ LCRA Public Meeting – May 13th, 8:00–11:00 AM

Don’t forget! The LCRA public meeting is just around the corner.
📍 Burnet County Community Center
401 E. Jackson St., Burnet, TX
🕗 Tuesday, May 13 | 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM
This come-and-go style meeting allows members of the public to speak for up to 3 minutes. Comments will be recorded and considered by LCRA staff. There will be no presentation or Q&A, so this is your chance to be heard.
⚠️ Important: LCRA only evaluates issues related to stormwater runoff and water quality. Please avoid topics like dust, traffic, noise, or blasting—LCRA does not have authority over those.
✅ Focus your comments on:

Runoff carrying sediment and pollutants into Inks Lake and Lake Buchanan
Erosion and sediment flow into nearby creeks
Water contamination from high-velocity runoff or karst formations
Violations of LCRA’s Water Quality Protection Program

The SaveBurnet.com team will be on-site with tables outside to help guide your comments and provide materials. For more tips and talking points, visit our website: www.SaveBurnet.com

💪 We Stay United – This Is Far from Over
Asphalt Inc. is counting on us to get tired, to get discouraged, and to give up. But that’s not who we are. That’s not what SaveBurnet.com stands for.
Even if Asphalt Inc. secures all its permits, we are prepared and committed to taking legal action to challenge the construction and operation of this rock crushing facility.
Now more than ever, it is essential that we stay united, engaged, and focused.

🌟 In Closing – Strength in Unity
This journey is not easy—but it's worth it. The Texas Hill Country is worth protecting. Your voice, your time, and your passion are shaping the outcome of this fight.
Together, we’ve already made a lasting impact. Now let’s keep going.

With strength, gratitude, and hope,
—The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
"One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.

update 47 - big progress on hb5151 & Critical lcra meeting may 13

5/2/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,
We have GREAT news to share and an important call to action coming up soon!

✅ 1) HB 5151 Passes Out of Committee – Unanimously!
We are thrilled to inform you that House Bill 5151, sponsored by our tireless champion State Representative Colonel Terry Wilson, was unanimously approved by the House Environmental Regulation Committee yesterday with a vote of 9–0! 🎉
This is a major step forward in our mission to stop the proposed rock crushing facility and protect the fragile ecosystems of the Texas Hill Country.
A huge thank you to the hundreds of you who submitted your support online, by mail, or in person at the Capitol. Your voices made this happen.
We'll update you next week with ways to continue supporting HB 5151 as it advances through the Texas House.

📣 2) Important: LCRA Public Comment Meeting – May 13
The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) will host a public come-and-go meeting to receive feedback on the stormwater runoff permit application for the proposed rock crusher site:
🗓 Date: Tuesday, May 13
🕗 Time: 8:00 – 11:00 a.m.
📍 Location: Burnet County Community Center, 401 E. Jackson St., Burnet, TX
This meeting will not include a formal presentation or Q&A session. Attendees will visit stations to provide up to 3 minutes of spoken comment, which will be recorded and included in LCRA’s permit review.
SaveBurnet.com will have tables set up outside to assist community members with talking points and guidance.

🔍 What You CAN and CANNOT Say at the LCRA Meeting:
LCRA is only authorized to consider issues related to stormwater runoff and water quality under the Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance (HLWO).
🚫 Please avoid comments about:

Air quality or dust
Traffic, roads, or truck safety
Blasting, noise, or light pollution
Water usage or pumping amounts
Property values

✅ Focus your comments on stormwater runoff and water quality, such as:

Sediment, diesel residue, and toxins from the crusher site will flow into nearby creeks, Inks Lake, and Lake Buchanan, contaminating reservoirs under LCRA jurisdiction.
The site’s karst limestone geology allows pollutants to quickly reach the aquifer, threatening wells and springs.
Erosion from exposed topsoil will increase during Hill Country rains, carrying debris into Peter’s Creek and other tributaries.
The permit only addresses a 25-year flood event, which is inadequate in a region prone to sudden flash flooding.
Uncontrolled runoff could flood the spring-fed pool at Camp Longhorn, impact ranchers’ livestock, and harm the federal fish hatchery on Lake LBJ.
High-velocity runoff caused by compacted surfaces could worsen downstream turbidity and strain culverts and rural infrastructure.
The site’s location on a documented fault line raises concerns about groundwater contamination via recharge zones.
The application lacks a comprehensive stormwater detention plan—common with rock crushers that try to minimize costs.

🎥 3) Must-See Video: “Running Dry” – Central Texas Water Crisis
We also urge you to watch this compelling KVUE special report hosted by Judy Maggio, which outlines the escalating water crisis in Central Texas:
▶️ Running Dry – Watch the Video
LCRA warns in this report that without significant rainfall or flooding soon, our water reserves could be depleted in just a few years.
Now more than ever, we must prevent stormwater pollution from adding to the crisis.

💚 In Closing – We Stand United
We are proud of the progress we’ve made together—from the Capitol to the community—and we're just getting started.
Let’s keep the momentum going:

Celebrate the HB 5151 committee win
Show up strong on May 13 to protect our water
Keep spreading the word

Together, we are one voice for the Hill Country.

With gratitude,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
"One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It."

update 46 - hope, progress, and unity at saveburnet.com

4/25/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,
We have BIG news and important updates to share following another critical week in our fight to protect the Texas Hill Country:

1️⃣ House Bill 5151 — Championing Protection for Texas’ Natural Treasures
On April 24th, Colonel Terry Wilson’s HB 5151 was formally discussed before the Texas House Environmental Regulation Committee at the Capitol.
You can watch the full discussion by Clicking Here. (Note: HB 5151 begins at -3:09:30 on the video player.)
Summary of HB 5151 Key Points:

Prohibits the construction and operation of Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) and rock crushing facilities near critical environmental areas.
Directly protects places like Longhorn Caverns, Inks Lake, youth camps (such as Camp Longhorn), and sensitive water resources.
Prioritizes human health, tourism, recreation, and the environment over industrial profits.
Recognizes the irreplaceable cultural, historical, and environmental value of the Texas Hill Country.

We are incredibly grateful to Colonel Terry Wilson for authoring and championing this bold and necessary bill.
💬 About the Hearing:
The Environmental Regulation Committee conducted a highly professional hearing, allowing for an open and respectful exchange of information. However, it was clear that TCEQ continues to struggle to defend its permitting processes and adherence to its mission of protecting public health and natural resources.
SaveBurnet.com was exceptionally well represented:

Approx 25 individuals spoke in support of HB 5151.
- Including 3 representatives from the distinguished organization TRAM, 15 from SaveBurnet.com, and 5 from Camp Longhorn!
- Out of respect for the committee member's time, we did not bring hundreds of speakers to the capital.
Special thanks to our tireless advocates who also walked the halls of the Capitol delivering information packets as well as speaking with committee members and state representatives.
🏆 Special Recognition List: Kristin Meredith and Heidi Meredith, David Owens, John Braun, Doug Golding, Kenda Avery, Sherrye McAnelly, Alan Mc Anelly, Rachel George, Jay George.

This was a phenomenal show of strength and unity—and it made an undeniable impact.
📈 Support Numbers:
When HB 3482 (Rep. Ellen Troxclair’s bill) was presented on April 9th, we celebrated an incredible 660 public support comments.
Today, we are even more thrilled to announce that HB 5151 received over 710 support comments!
👏 THANK YOU to everyone who submitted your comments—you made a real difference!

2️⃣ News Coverage — Our Voices Are Being Heard Loud and Clear
The media coverage of our efforts continues to be outstanding, both in Austin and across local outlets. We owe a huge thanks to dedicated reporters like Connie Swinney and Elizabeth De Los Santos for their fair, timely, and accurate reporting.
Here are three excellent articles covering our recent milestones:

Please take a few minutes to read and share these important stories to help amplify our cause.

3️⃣ Upcoming LCRA Meeting on May 13th — Focus on Water Quality!
Many of you may have already received a letter from LCRA announcing a "Come and Go" Public Meeting on May 13th regarding Asphalt Inc.'s water quality permit application.
👉 Click Here for a copy of the letter.
More detailed guidance about this meeting will be coming soon, but here are the key points for now:
✅ LCRA is still accepting public comments by:

Their website,
In-person at the May 13th meeting,
By mail.

⚠️ Important:
When commenting to LCRA, remember that they ONLY regulate water runoff — not air quality, noise, traffic, or groundwater consumption.
Focus your comments on:

Contamination risks to stock tanks, creeks, lakes, and rivers,
Control and monitoring methods for polluted runoff,
Impacts on aquifer recharge zones,
Long-term effects on surrounding ecosystems and drinking water sources.

By keeping comments focused and targeted, we increase our credibility and our influence.

💚 Closing: United We Stand, Stronger Than Ever
Friends, we have made incredible strides in just a few short months.

We have galvanized thousands of Texans,
Influenced meaningful legislation,
Captured media attention,
And brought our community together to stand up for what is right.

We are stronger because we stand together—and we are winning hearts and minds across Texas.
Let’s continue to push, to speak out, and to protect the only Hill Country we have.
Together, we are unstoppable. Together, we will save Burnet County and our Texas treasures.

With gratitude and hope,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
"One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It."

update 45 - final chance to show your support for hb5151 & Ride with us to the capitol!

4/23/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,
We have an important opportunity TOMORROW—Thursday, April 24th at 10:30 AM—when House Bill 5151 will be formally presented to the Texas House Environmental Regulations Committee at the Capitol.
This bill is a critical step in our fight to protect the Texas Hill Country from the harmful impacts of Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) and rock crushing facilities. Let’s make our voices heard—tonight is the last night to submit your support online!

🔧 Here’s how to help right now:
✅ Texas residents who wish to electronically submit comments related to agenda items on this notice without testifying in person can do so until the hearing is adjourned by visiting:
Click here to submit your comment now »
Just 2–3 sentences is enough. Tell the committee why you support HB 5151 and why rock crushers have no place near Texas parks, lakes, and youth camps. Please note Supporting Comments MUST be completed before April 24th!, Please don't wait.
✅ For those persons who will be testifying, information for in-person witness registration (optional), can be found here:
Witness registration link »
✅ Email the Committee on Environmental Regulation:
Committee contact page »
✅ Watch the hearing live (April 24th, 10:30AM):
Texas House Video Broadcast »
This is the kind of legislation that doesn’t just slow down bad permits—it stops them completely. But it won’t pass unless we show overwhelming public support. We did it for HB 3482. Let’s do it again.

🚌 Ride With Us to the Capitol – Just 5 Seats Left!
We’ve chartered a small bus, and 5 seats are still available for supporters who want to:

Speak during the hearing (optional)
Stand in solidarity with our group at the Capitol

Even if you don’t want to speak, just showing up makes a difference! Please wear your green SaveBurnet.com shirt. Don’t have one? No problem—we’ll have extras available on the bus.
🗣️ Example Statement (3-minute max):
Dear Members of the Environmental Regulations Committee,
I am writing to express my strong support for House Bill 5151. Unique and irreplaceable natural landmarks like Longhorn Caverns deserve full protection from the harmful impacts of Aggregate Production Operations and rock quarries.
These Texas treasures are not just scenic—they are vital to our environmental heritage, tourism economy, and the well-being of surrounding communities.
I respectfully urge the committee to approve HB 5151 and take a stand for the preservation of our state's most precious resources.

📍 Want to Ride With Us? Sign Up Tonight!
Go to the SaveBurnet.com Contact Page and submit Click Here for Link:

Your name
Email address
Phone number
In the message box: "I want to speak (or attend) on April 24 and ride the bus."
Be sure to check the opt-in box to submit

⏳ Spots are first come, first served. Confirmations will be emailed tonight by 9 PM.

🕖 Bus & Hearing Day Details

Meet at: AgriLife Extension Building (North Parking Lot)
📍 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611
Arrival Time: 7:00 – 7:15 AM
Departure: 7:30 AM sharp
Return: Approx. 1:00 PM – 4:30 PM (after the hearing concludes)

💬 Why HB 5151 Matters
HB 5151 doesn’t call for more studies—it prohibits new rock crushing plants and APOs from being located near:

State Parks like Inks Lake and Longhorn Caverns
Youth Camps like Camp Longhorn
Federally protected water sources and fish hatcheries

This is real protection. Real change.

💚 In Closing
Thanks to your continued engagement, legislators are listening. Now is the time to step forward again and show the state that the people of Burnet County are united and determined.
Let’s bring our voices to Austin and support HB 5151 with strength, clarity, and hope.

With gratitude and determination,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 44 - speak up for house bill 5151 this thursday!

4/21/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,

We’ve got a critical opportunity this Thursday, April 24th at 10:30 AM, when House Bill 5151 will be formally presented to the Texas House Environmental Regulations Committee. This is a big step forward in our fight to protect the Texas Hill Country from the harmful effects of Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) and rock crushing facilities.

🚌 Travel With Us – Speak Up at the Capitol!
We’ve chartered a small bus (18-20 seats) to help get supporters to the Capitol—and 16 spots are still available for those who are willing to present a short, supportive statement during the hearing.
Speaking is easy, and you’ll have up to 3 minutes, though even a short, heartfelt message makes a difference. Here’s a sample statement to inspire you:

Dear Members of the Environmental Regulations Committee,
I am writing to express my strong support for House Bill 5151. Unique and irreplaceable natural landmarks like Longhorn Caverns deserve full protection from the harmful impacts of Aggregate Production Operations and rock quarries.
These Texas treasures are not just scenic—they are vital to our environmental heritage, tourism economy, and the well-being of surrounding communities.
I respectfully urge the committee to approve HB 5151 and take a stand for the preservation of our state's most precious resources.

📍 How to Sign Up for the Bus and Speak
If you would like to ride with us and present your support, please visit the SaveBurnet.com Contact Page, fill in your:

Name
Email Address
Phone Number
In the message box: State that you will speak on April 24th and want to ride the bus
Be sure to click the opt-in checkbox to submit.

🚨 Spots are first come, first served. You will receive a confirmation if you’re one of the 15 selected.
🕖 Logistics for the Day:

Meet at: AgriLife Extension Building
📍 607 N. Vanderveer, Burnet, TX 78611
Arrival time: Please arrive by 7:00 - 7:15 AM
Departure: Bus will leave between 7:30 AM sharp
Return: Bus will head back after hearing is over sometime around Noon to 4PM

💬 Why HB 5151 Matters:
HB 5151 isn’t asking for studies or suggestions—it proposes prohibiting new APO or rock crushing facilities from operating near our most sensitive areas, including:

State parks like Inks Lake and Longhorn Caverns
Youth camps like Camp Longhorn
Federally managed lakes and hatcheries

Together, we can show the committee that Texans want real protection—not permits for pollution.

💚 In Closing
We are incredibly proud of the momentum we've built. You’ve made your voices heard, and legislators are listening. Now let’s take it one step further and stand united in Austin for HB 5151.
We believe in this cause, we believe in each other, and we believe we can win this fight—if we show up, speak up, and stand together.

With gratitude and hope,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 43 - our voice is being heard....Let's keep the momentum going!

4/18/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com supporters,
We have some incredible updates to share and another urgent call to action that needs your attention this week. Please read on and take a few minutes to act—it really makes a difference!

✅ Part 1: Summary for HB 3482 – Overwhelming Support in Committee Public Hearing!
On April 9th, State Representative Ellen Troxclair's House Bill 3482 was formally presented before the Texas House Natural Resources Committee.
📝 Most bills heard that day received between 0–10 public comments. One bill received 149 comments.
🌟 But HB 3482? Over 660 positive or supportive comments! That’s a record-breaking number and sends a powerful message to the committee and to the rest of the Legislature that Texans care deeply about protecting our state parks, camps, neighborhoods, and water supplies from dangerous aggregate mining operations.
🔁 Troxclair's team is currently revising HB 3482 based on feedback from committee members. We will update you as soon as there is movement or a vote scheduled. This was a huge success, and we thank all of you who submitted comments and made your voices heard!

🚨 Part 2: Support Needed NOW for HB 5151 (Filed by Rep. Terry Wilson)
Our next mission is even more bold and direct.
HB 5151, filed by Rep. Terry Wilson, does not ask for environmental studies or hydrological models before a rock crushing operation is permitted. Instead, it prohibits the creation of new aggregate production operations (APOs), rock crushers, and quarries in areas near:

🏞️ Lakes operated by Texas river authorities with national fish hatcheries
🌄 State parks with national natural landmarks (e.g., Longhorn Caverns)
🏕️ Youth camps licensed by the Department of State Health Services

📜 In short: HB 5151 would outright block new industrial mining operations from being permitted in these highly sensitive and irreplaceable areas.
📅 The Environmental Regulation committee will hear HB 5151 on April 24th--and we only have a few days left to submit our support.

🔧 Here’s how to help right now:
✅ Texas residents who wish to electronically submit comments related to agenda items on this notice without testifying in person can do so until the hearing is adjourned by visiting:
Click here to submit your comment now »
Just 2–3 sentences is enough. Tell the committee why you support HB 5151 and why rock crushers have no place near Texas parks, lakes, and youth camps. Please note Supporting Comments MUST be completed before April 24th!, Please don't wait.
✅ For those persons who will be testifying, information for in-person witness registration (optional), can be found here:
Witness registration link »
✅ Email the Committee on Environmental Regulation:
Committee contact page »
✅ Watch the hearing live (April 24th, 10:30AM):
Texas House Video Broadcast »
This is the kind of legislation that doesn’t just slow down bad permits—it stops them completely. But it won’t pass unless we show overwhelming public support. We did it for HB 3482. Let’s do it again.

📬 Part 3: Corrected Contact Info (emails) for State LeadersSome of the email addresses we provided previously are being filtered or rejected. Please use these corrected addresses when contacting Texas leaders:

Governor Greg Abbott [email protected]
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick [email protected]
Attorney General Ken Paxton [email protected]
Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham [email protected]

Your voice matters—please take 5 minutes to send a short message to these officials. You can express support for HB 3482 and HB 5151, and share your concerns about the proposed rock quarry off FM 3509 and the impact it would have on Camp Longhorn, Longhorn Cavern State Park, Inks Lake, and surrounding families and wildlife.

💚 In Closing…We are making real progress—but it takes all of us. Legislators are hearing us, because you showed up, submitted comments, and spread the word.
Let’s keep the pressure on and give HB 5151 the same surge of support we gave HB 3482. Together, we are building a powerful movement to protect the heart of the Texas Hill Country.

With gratitude and determination,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 42 - hb 3482 committee hearing recap & what comes next

4/10/25

Dear Friends and Supporters,

We’re excited to share some great news about our continued fight to protect the Texas Hill Country. Yesterday--April 9th--House Bill 3482, championed by our State Representative Ellen Troxclair, was formally presented before the Texas House Natural Resources Committee at the Capitol.
📽️ You can watch the full recording by Clicking Here
(Note: HB 3482 begins at 1:01:13 on the video player.)

🔍 What Happened at the Hearing?
The committee engaged in a meaningful discussion, asking thoughtful questions that reflected concern for both public safety and environmental protection, while also recognizing considerations for developers and economic interests. This kind of balanced inquiry is exactly what we hoped to see—a real dialogue about how to protect what matters while ensuring responsible development.

💬 Strong Testimonies from Our Community
We’re incredibly proud of Nan Manning, Fermin Ortiz, and Todd Sifleet, who did an outstanding job speaking on behalf of our community and in support of HB 3482. Their testimonies were heartfelt, factual, and compelling. This bill matters, and our local voices made that very clear.

🔎 LCRA’s Role and Status
LCRA's representative presented at the hearing and answered questions. We believe that due diligence is being conducted on the permit submitted by Asphalt Inc. LCRA appears to be working primarily from permit documentation and calculations—with no indication that any site visits have been conducted yet.
This may become a concern.
Because without setting foot on the ground, how can LCRA fully understand the real-world impact of water runoff—particularly as it flows toward Camp Longhorn, where children swim daily in an open-air pool?
We trust LCRA will ultimately do what’s right for the community, but we encourage them to conduct thorough site inspections to supplement their paperwork.

😠 TCEQ’s Troubling Testimony
Then came the presenters from TCEQ, and frankly—it was disheartening. It’s clear that something is broken.
A few glaring examples:

TCEQ granted an Air Quality Permit without a single Air Quality Monitor in all of Burnet County.
TCEQ’s testimony claimed the quarry operations “may involve blasting.”
➤ But in the TCEQ-hosted town hall on Dec 20, Asphalt Inc.'s COO stated clearly: YES—there will be blasting.
TCEQ also stated that they do not regulate blasting, as it’s outside their authority.
➤ Yet blasting is one of the most significant sources of dust pollution, and dust is at the very heart of air quality concerns.

These are not minor oversights. They reflect either ineptitude, incompetence, or duplicity—none of which are acceptable from an agency tasked with protecting public health and natural resources.

🧾 Reminder of TCEQ’s Mission Statement:“The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality strives to protect our state's public health and natural resources consistent with sustainable economic development. Our goal is clean air, clean water, and the safe management of waste.”
Let’s be honest—if TCEQ sees itself only as a permitting agency, and not a watchdog for our air and water, then maybe it doesn’t need 2,800+ employees and a full state-funded budget.

💪 Hope for HB 3482 and the Hill Country
We are hopeful that the Natural Resources Committee sees what we see—a fragile, irreplaceable region under threat, and a bill that offers real, common-sense protections. HB 3482 simply ensures that when mining operations are proposed near lakes, state parks, and youth camps, the state must first determine whether harm could be done. That’s smart, responsible, and absolutely necessary.

📺 MEDIA COVERAGE – Tune in to KXAN!
We’re also thrilled to share that KXAN will be covering House Bill 3482 and the broader quarry controversy in a segment airing tomorrow night, Friday, April 11th, on the evening news. Be sure to tune in to support the cause and hear the latest insights.

🙌 In Closing…
We’re energized, encouraged, and incredibly grateful for the continued support of every single one of you. From those who showed up at the Capitol, to those spreading the word online, to the thousands who have submitted letters, comments, and emails—you are making a difference.

Please continue to follow updates, stay engaged, and keep believing in the power of united voices. Together, we can and will protect the Texas Hill Country from irresponsible industrial development.

With gratitude and hope,
– The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 41 - how you can help 3482 pass the committee, please act today! plus message from ellen troxclair

4/6/25

Please see below and note that WE only have a couple days before the committee hearing begins, please don't hesitate, act TODAY!

We write today with BIG NEWS: We now have a date set for Representative Ellen Troxclair’s HB 3482 regarding quarries, to be heard in the Texas House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee.

WHAT: The bill will need to be passed by this Committee, for it then to advance to the full House, then Senate, and be signed into law by the Governor. Here is where you can read more about this bill: https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=HB3482

WHEN: The Committee will be starting at 8:00 am on Wednesday, April 9th, gavel out when the House convenes at 10:00 am, and then resume work after the House adjourns. We do not know when, during the day, the bill will be called to be heard.

WHERE: Room E1.036 in the Capitol Extension.
Map of the Capitol: https://tspb.texas.gov/plan/maps/doc/capitol_visitors_guide.pdf
Parking information: https://tspb.texas.gov/plan/parking/parking.html

HOW you can help: Please consider providing in person or written support for HB 3482 to the Committee. The public comments are limited to three minutes, and will be the most powerful way to provide support. All comments are considered carefully, so don’t hesitate to contribute any way you can.

In person testimony: https://house.texas.gov/committees/witness-registration
Written comments: https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c390
Watch the hearing here: https://house.texas.gov/videos
Please FORWARD this email to any friend or neighbor who may be willing to speak up about this!

WHO: The Representative’s colleagues on the Natural Resources Committee will appreciate your perspective, and a friendly tone and a compelling personal story may best communicate that. The Committee members may all also be emailed here: https://house.texas.gov/committees/committee/390

WHY: The proposed quarry and rock crushing plant would cause innumerable harms to our community and natural environment. We are hopeful that we can stop it. Just today Representative Troxclair filed another letter with the TCEQ to ask them to do just that. You may go to https://www14.tceq.texas.gov/epic/eFiling/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.home and search for Docket Number 2025-0338-AIR to see that, and related filings.
__________________________________________

ANNOUNCEMENT FROM ELLEN TROXCLAIR:
Representative Troxclair is honored to stand with YOU and the many local neighbors, campers, ranchers and officials at all levels who are working together to stop this proposed quarry from advancing. In particular we are grateful for the team with Save Burnet for their leadership and diligent work. Thank you for considering testifying or providing written support for HB 3482, it is just one positive step forward in our shared effort.

Sincerely,
The Office of State Representative Ellen Troxclair | HD 19
Room E1.322 | (512) 463-0490
__________________________________________

With appreciation,
The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 40 - Exciting Opportunity to Make a Difference!

4/5/25

Hello, friends and advocates!

We have thrilling news to share. Our dedicated State Representative Ellen Troxclair has championed a groundbreaking bill, HB 3482, and it’s on the fast track to making an impact! This vital piece of legislation is set for a committee hearing on Wednesday, April 9th.

Why is this so exciting? Because many bills don't even make it this far. Having the chance to be heard in committee is a huge win and a testament to the importance of this issue.

**About HB 3482:**
Rep. Troxclair’s bill ensures that comprehensive studies are conducted to assess any possible harm a rock quarry might inflict on our community's well-being, our businesses, and our treasured environment, including our parks and lakes and landmarks like Camp Longhorn. This thoughtful approach ensures that safety and environmental integrity come first. It’s common sense, and it’s about protecting what we love!

**Join Us in Supporting This Cause:**
The committee hearing will take place before the esteemed Natural Resource Committee at the Capitol, in room E2.036. Join us at 8 AM to show your support and, if you're inspired, to speak your mind! 🗣️ Registration is simple—just sign up at the kiosk outside the hearing room.

**Can’t Attend but Still Want to Help?**
Your voice still matters! Reach out to Mr. Robert Moncada, the Natural Resources Committee Clerk, at 512-463-0802. Express your support for HB 3482 and urge the committee to propel this essential bill forward to the full House for a vote.

Together, let's stand for progress, safety, and the beauty of our community. Your participation can make all the difference.

Thank you for your passion and commitment!The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 39 - How you can Help pass hb 3482

4/4/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

In a previous update, we mentioned that two important bills have been filed to help protect our Texas Hill Country:

House Bill 3482 by Representative Ellen Troxclair
House Bill 5151 by Representative Terry Wilson

As of today, HB 5151 has not yet been assigned to a committee. However, we have great news--HB 3482 has officially been referred to the Texas House Natural Resources Committee. This is an important first step in the legislative process, but we need your help to make sure the bill continues to move forward. Copies of HB 3482 and HB 5151 are located on the SaveBurnet.com website.

🧭 What Happens When a Bill is Referred to Committee?
Getting a bill referred to the committee is just the beginning. Unfortunately, only 1 in 8 bills makes it out of committee and onto the House floor for debate. The rest are often left to die in committee, never receiving a hearing or vote.

Here’s how the process works:

The House Speaker assigns the bill to a committee.
The Committee Chair decides which bills will be considered.
If the bill is taken up, a public hearing is held.
The committee may then vote to advance the bill—or take no action, which kills the bill quietly.

The Texas State Legislative Process Handbook explains this in more detail. You can download it directly from the SaveBurnet.com website or by Clicking Here.

🔧 Our Immediate Goal: Get HB 3482 a Hearing
The most important thing we can do right now is to encourage the Texas House Natural Resources Committee to schedule HB 3482 for a hearing. Without a hearing, the bill will stall.
To do this, we need to contact the committee members and express our support for the bill.

📬 Who Should You Contact?
✅ 1) Your State Representatives & SenatorsUse this link to find your elected officials:
🔗 Who Represents Me – Texas Legislature
✅ 2) Texas House Natural Resources Committee MembersThis is the committee reviewing HB 3482. You can find all committee member names and background and the phone number for the county clerk who can provide additional guidance:
🔗 Natural Resources Committee Members

📄 How to Send Your Message

📧 Email or Call:

Use the information linked above to email or call your officials.
Be brief, clear, and respectful. Explain how the quarry would negatively affect our health, environment, and community.
Share that you support HB 3482 and want it scheduled for a hearing.

📬 Mail Letters:
Mail is another effective option. Use the format below:

Texas House of Representatives
The Honorable [Insert Name]
P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768-2910

Texas Senate
The Honorable [Insert Name]
P.O. Box 12068
Austin, TX 78711-2068

Texas Governor
The Honorable Greg Abbott
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, TX 78711

🗣️ What to Say in Your Message
Use your own voice and personalize your message. Here's a quick outline:

Introduce Yourself: Name, city, and why this issue matters to you.
Support HB 3482: Mention you support this bill and urge it to be scheduled for a hearing.
State Why It Matters: Explain that the proposed quarry on FM 3509 is near:
- Two state parks (Inks Lake & Longhorn Caverns)
- A youth camp (Camp Longhorn)
- A fragile aquifer recharge zone
- And could impact the federal fish hatchery on Lake LBJ
Request Action: Ask them to vote in favor of the bill.

🟡 Tip: Stay positive, respectful, and fact-focused. Avoid political commentary or personal attacks.

🔁 What Happens After the Bill Passes Committee?
If the bill is voted out of committee:

It is scheduled for floor debate in the House.
It must be approved by the House in two votes.
Then it moves to the Senate, where the process repeats.
If both chambers pass it, the bill goes to the Governor’s desk to be signed into law.

✅ Summary: What You Need to Do Today

Read and understand HB 3482 Click here
Identify your representatives and Natural Resources Committee members
Email, call, or write them with your support
Ask them to support HB 3482 and schedule it for a hearing
Share this update with friends, family, and neighbors

💚 We Are Gaining Ground – Let’s Keep Going!
Thanks to your efforts, HB 3482 is alive and moving. This bill represents a real chance to protect our children, our parks, and our water from the destructive impact of industrial mining. But we must act now to keep the momentum going.
Together, we can stop Asphalt Inc. and preserve the beauty, health, and heritage of our Texas Hill Country—but only if we all do our part.
Let’s stay committed, stay vocal, and keep fighting for what’s right.

With appreciation,
– The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“One Hill Country. One Voice. One Chance to Save It.”

update 38 - Major news on the motions to overturn (MTos)! important progress to protect the texas hill country

3/28/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have some great and very important news to share with you today regarding the Motions to Overturn (MTOs) that were filed in response to TCEQ's approval of Air Permit #176835 for Asphalt Inc.’s proposed rock crushing plant on FM 3509.
We’ve now received the official responses from all parties involved—and there’s reason for hope.

⚖️ Three Official Responses to the Motions to Overturn:
These responses have now been submitted to the TCEQ Commissioners, who must decide whether to grant or deny the MTOs.
You can read all three responses on our website at SaveBurnet.com or access them directly by clicking the links below:

Asphalt Inc. LLC’s Legal Counsel – Recommends denying the MTOs
📄 Click Here to View
TCEQ Executive Director’s Legal Counsel – Also recommends denying the MTOs
📄 Click Here to View
TCEQ Office of Public Interest Counsel (OPIC) – Recommends granting the MTOs
📄 Click Here to View

🟢 What Happens Next?
Now that all responses have been submitted, the matter rests with the three TCEQ Commissioners. They have 45 days from the mailing date of the permit approval notice to make a decision. If they take no action, the motions are automatically denied.
📅 Based on our estimate, that 45-day window will expire around May 2nd , unless an extension is granted.
We will continue to closely monitor the situation and update you immediately once a decision is made. We are hopeful that the Commissioners will listen to the OPIC recommendation and do what is right for Burnet County and the Texas Hill Country.

🏛️ Understanding How TCEQ Works – A Quick Overview:
To help you better understand who’s making these decisions and how TCEQ functions, here’s a summary of the agency’s structure:

1) Office of the Commissioners
TCEQ is led by three full-time commissioners, appointed by the Governor of Texas with confirmation by the Texas Senate. Their job is to establish overall policy and make final determinations on contested permitting matters like ours.
Current Commissioners:

Brooke T. Paup, Chairwoman
Bobby Janecka, Commissioner
Catarina R. Gonzales, Commissioner

Commissioners serve six-year terms, staggered so that one expires every two years. The Governor designates the chairperson.
These commissioners will soon decide whether to grant or deny the MTOs. Let’s hope they prioritize the health of our children, the protection of our parks, and the safety of our water.

2) Office of the Executive Director (ED)
The Executive Director is hired by the Commissioners and is responsible for managing the agency’s day-to-day operations, including:

Reviewing and recommending actions on permits and enforcement.
Running 17 statewide TCEQ offices.
Approving uncontested permit applications.

Key Personnel:

Kelly Keel, Executive Director
Steven Schar, Deputy Executive Director

In this case, the ED recommended denial of the MTOs and supports the air permit for Asphalt Inc.

3) Office of Public Interest Counsel (OPIC)
This office is a critical ally for the public. Created by the Texas Legislature, the OPIC exists to represent the people’s interest in TCEQ proceedings. While they do not represent individuals, they help ensure fairness and public accountability.
Garrett T. Arthur, Public Interest Counsel, and his staff:

Participate in contested hearings on permits and rules.
Provide input to the Commission from a public health and environmental perspective.
Work independently from the ED and other TCEQ offices.

Most importantly, OPIC has officially recommended that the Commission GRANT the MTOs and overturn the permit approval. This is a major win in our corner and shows that our concerns are valid and serious.

🙏 Final Thoughts
We are cautiously optimistic. For the first time in this permitting process, an internal TCEQ office has sided with us—the citizens, parents, park lovers, and defenders of the Hill Country.
We urge the Commissioners to follow OPIC’s recommendation and do what’s right:
✅ Grant the Motions to Overturn
✅ Revoke Asphalt Inc.’s air permit
✅ Protect our kids, our parks, and our water
We’ll continue to pray, monitor, and fight—and with your support, we’re confident we can win this battle.
Stay strong. Stay united. And stay ready.

With hope and gratitude,
— The SaveBurnet.com Team
🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com
“Together, we are the voice of the Hill Country—and together, we will protect it.”

update 37 - how to write an effective email to your state officials - help stop the rock quarry on fm 3509

3/21/25

Dear Supporters,

We need your help more than ever. With the proposed rock quarry off of FM 3509 in Burnet County, it's critical that we speak up and demand action from our state officials.

Before you do anything, please review the presentation titled:
📄 "Marble Falls APO’s – Dust Pictures 3-21-25" which is on the SaveBurnet.com website. Click Here to View.
This short but powerful slideshow shows real images and facts from active Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) just 15 miles away in Marble Falls. It is a shocking visual reminder of what we can expect if Asphalt Inc. is allowed to build another site in our community.

💬 Step-by-Step: How to Write an Effective Message to State Officials
We’re asking you to personally email the key leaders listed below. Your message does not need to be long—it just needs to be clear, respectful, and personal. Here’s how:

✅ What to Include in Your Message

Start with Who You Are
- Your name and where you live (especially if in Burnet or nearby areas).
- Explain you're a resident or concerned citizen who loves the Hill Country.
Clearly State Your Opposition
- Example: "I am strongly opposed to the proposed rock quarry by Asphalt Inc. on FM 3509 in Burnet County."
List the Key Concerns (choose 2-4 most relevant to you)
- 🚫 Dangerous Proximity: The site is located next to Camp Longhorn and near two state parks—Inks Lake and Longhorn Caverns.
- 💨 Dust & Air Quality: TCEQ admitted they have no air monitors in Burnet County. Hazardous dust from other APOs already impacts our area (see SaveBurnet.com for supporting presentations).
- 💦 Water Contamination: Polluted runoff could harm Inks Lake, Lake LBJ, and the federal fish hatchery.
- 🚱 Groundwater Depletion: The operation could use over 9 million gallons per month just for dust suppression—while we’re being asked to conserve.
- 🏡 Public Health & Safety: Children, seniors, and those with respiratory conditions will be at risk.
- 📉 Economic Damage: Tourism, property values, and the natural heritage of Burnet County will suffer.
Request Action
- Ask them to oppose the quarry, support House Bill 3482 & 5151, and call for a moratorium on new APO permits near residential and recreational areas.
- Urge them to demand TCEQ and LCRA perform proper environmental impact studies.
Close Politely
- Thank them for their time and service to Texas.
- Offer to share more information or discuss your concerns further.

❌ What NOT to Include

❌ No profanity, sarcasm, or threatening language.
❌ Don’t make accusations or attack individuals.
❌ Avoid overly emotional language—stick to facts and personal impact.
❌ Don’t use pre-written form letters--make it your own.

📬 Send Your Email To:Please send your email to all of the following officials:

Governor Greg Abbott – [email protected]
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick – [email protected]
Attorney General Ken Paxton – [email protected]
Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham – [email protected]
Senator Pete Flores – [email protected]
Rep. Ellen Troxclair – [email protected]
Rep. Terry M. Wilson – [email protected]
Rep. Dustin Burrows (Speaker) – [email protected]

📌 Subject line suggestion: “Urgent: Oppose Rock Quarry on FM 3509 – Protect the Texas Hill Country”

🗂 Where to Find More Info
All materials, including the full dust photo presentation and additional details about the TCEQ and LCRA permitting process, are available at 🌐 www.SaveBurnet.com Website "Reference Materials" Section

Thank you for standing up for our community, our environment, and our future. Together, we will keep the Texas Hill Country safe, clean, and beautiful for generations to come.

— The SaveBurnet.com Team 💚
Fighting for clean air, clean water, and a stronger Texas Hill Country.

update 36 - Three mtos filed & new subdivision proposal

3/14/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,
We have two major updates to share with you, both of which could have a significant impact on our fight to protect the Texas Hill Country.

1) Update on the Motions to Overturn (MTO) – We Have THREE!
Last week, I shared that we had two Motions to Overturn (MTOs) filed against TCEQ Permit #176835—but I was wrong… we actually have THREE!

A huge thank you to Myra Habbit for also filing an MTO. This means that three separate challenges are now in place to fight TCEQ’s flawed approval of the air permit for Asphalt Inc.’s proposed rock-crushing plant.
📄 You can view a copy of Myra’s MTO on the SaveBurnet.com website by Clicking Here.

More Good News: LCRA Commission Will Review All Three MTOs!
The TCEQ decision has now reached the LCRA Commission, which will be reviewing all three MTOs. This is significant because:

Very few MTOs actually make it to the commission for review, so this is a positive step forward!
The review process extends the decision timeline for up to 90 days (May 2nd, 2025).

This additional time gives us more opportunities to fight back and continue making our voices heard.
📄 The official March 13th, 2025, TCEQ letter regarding the MTOs is available on the SaveBurnet.com website under “Air Related Info” & “Deeds, Permits, Applications & Legislation.” You can also view the letter by Clicking Here.

2) Proposed Legacy Oaks Subdivision – Our Stance
Many of you have recently received letters from LCRA regarding a proposed new subdivision, Legacy Oaks, which would be built on the adjacent property next to the proposed rock-crushing plant. Like the rock crusher permit, LCRA is allowing the public to post comments and objections. Copy of the LCRA letter is on the SaveBurnet.com website under the LCRA & Water information page or by Clicking Here to View.

However, after careful consideration, we strongly recommend that we DO NOT protest this subdivision via the LCRA website.
Why?
It all comes down to what is best for our community and our Hill Country:
🚧 A Rock-Crushing Plant? OR 🏡 A Subdivision?
In our opinion, the choice is clear—our community is better off with a subdivision rather than an industrial facility that will create air pollution, water contamination, and blasting impacts.
At a later date, we will provide more information about this process, but for now, we wanted to get this important message out to our 3,000+ supporters.
📄 For more details about the Legacy Oaks Subdivision, visit the SaveBurnet.com website under the "Reference Material" page or Click Here to view and download the documents.
⚠️ Note: Some of the Legacy Oaks files are very large and may take time to download or open.

Stay Strong – We Are Making Great Progress!
These updates show that our efforts are working, and we are gaining ground in our fight to preserve the Texas Hill Country.
Thank you for your continued dedication and support. We will keep pushing forward and making our voices heard.
💪 Together, we are making a difference!

— The SaveBurnet.com Team

CORRECTION BELOW

Please accept my apologies for the 2nd email update. I mis-typed LCRA when it should have said TCEQ in my update part 1) highlighted below:

1) Update on the Motions to Overturn (MTO) – We Have THREE!Last week, I shared that we had two Motions to Overturn (MTOs) filed against TCEQ Permit #176835—but I was wrong… we actually have THREE!

A huge thank you to Myra Habbit for also filing an MTO. This means that three separate challenges are now in place to fight TCEQ’s flawed approval of the air permit for Asphalt Inc.’s proposed rock-crushing plant.

📄 You can view a copy of Myra’s MTO on the SaveBurnet.com website by Clicking Here.

More Good News: LCRA TCEQ Commission Will Review All Three MTOs!
The TCEQ decision has now reached the LCRA TCEQ Commission, which will be reviewing all three MTOs. This is significant because:

Very few MTOs actually make it to the commission for review, so this is a positive step forward!
The review process extends the decision timeline for up to 90 days (May 2nd, 2025).

update 35 - protect the texas hill country from blasting and destruction!

3/9/25

Below are three Videos and Comments Posted by Jack Wheeler the founder & Operations Manager of Lone Star Paving the dba for Asphalt Inc. LLC.

As a Reminder an Alabama based, publicly traded company called Construction Partners Inc (CPI) has purchased Asphalt Inc. LLC. To contact CPI directly please Click Here for the link.

As a resident of the Texas Hill Country, I am deeply disgusted by the idea of being thankful for rain solely to enable the devastation of our beautiful landscape for profit.

POST #1. The following video and commentary were recently posted on Jack Wheeler’s LinkedIn page (Click Here for the link). Jack Wheeler, the founder of Asphalt Inc., dba Lone Star Paving, shared:
"It's amazing how the sight and smell of a bonfire can transport you to another time and place. It's as if a distant memory of humans being around the campfire throughout time is ingrained in our DNA. Thankful for the rain to allow us to clear off the next parcel of land and get ready to strip, drill, and blast."

For most of us in the Texas Hill Country, rain is a blessing. We are grateful for the rain because it replenishes our precious water supply, nourishes our plants and trees, and sustains our wildlife. Rain helps keep the dust down, supports our ecosystem, and is a critical resource for our community’s wellbeing.

It is unfathomable to think that anyone would view rain as an opportunity to strip, drill, and blast the natural beauty of this area. This sentiment not only reflects a complete disregard for the environment but also reveals a profit-driven mentality that prioritizes industrial gain over nature’s preservation.

While many of us see rain as a symbol of life and renewal, it is appalling to witness it being celebrated as a means to destroy the very land we cherish. Our mission remains clear: to protect the Texas Hill Country, ensuring that our land, air, and water remain safe and abundant for generations to come.

POST #2. Jack Wheeler of Lone Star Paving - Asphalt Inc. recently posted a video and statement on LinkedIn (view here: Blasting Video) that truly highlights the threat facing our community.
In his own words:
"Drilling and blasting are the first steps in the mining process here at Lone Star Aggregates. We work with Buckley Powder Co. for our blasting needs and are very happy with the results that we are seeing in our production reports. Thanks Buckley for all of your hard work!"

While Asphalt Inc. celebrates its production gains, the Texas Hill Country faces the real risk of destruction. The massive dust clouds and ground-shaking blastsshowcased in the video are more than just production steps—they are a direct threat to:

Thousands of children attending summer camps nearby.
Residents living less than a mile away.
The natural beauty of two state parks, only three miles away.

You may also recall that when TCEQ recently approved the air quality permit for Asphalt Inc., they did not consider any dust abatement from blasting activities.

📢 Where is the government’s protection for our kids, residents, and state parks?
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's (TCEQ) mission is to protect public health and natural resources while supporting sustainable economic development. Their goals include achieving:

Clean air
Clean water
Safe waste management

However, the video of blasting operations and the approval of a flawed permit clearly show that TCEQ is not living up to its mission. Instead of protecting the community, TCEQ's decision seems to prioritize industrial profits over public safety.

🚨 Imagine this scenario:

Blasting operations creating massive dust clouds that settle over camps, homes, and parks.
Respiratory risks for our children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing health conditions.
The economic impact of reduced tourism and property value declines.

Now, more than ever, we need your support to hold TCEQ & your State Officials accountable and prevent this dangerous project from moving forward.

POST #3. Jack Wheeler of Lone Star Paving - Asphalt Inc. recently posted another video on LinkedIn, showcasing blasting operations with the following quote:
"Starting the day with a 180-shot explosion is just another day at Lone Star Aggregates!"
🔗 View the post and video here: Blasting Video.

For most of us, the Texas Hill Country represents tranquility, natural beauty, and a peaceful start to the day. We moved here to enjoy nature’s serenity, not to be jolted awake by industrial explosions.
It is unacceptable for this kind of industrial activity to occur so close to residential neighborhoods, children’s camps, and our beloved state parks. The impact of these blasts on our community, air quality, and safety is profoundly concerning.

🚨 We must act now to prevent this from becoming our new normal!
I urge all of you to get involved. Contact your state officials and make your voices heard. Our community deserves better protection from industrial encroachment.

📲 For contact information on all Texas officials, please visit the SaveBurnet.com website or Click Here.
Together, we can preserve the Texas Hill Country, ensuring it remains a safe, beautiful, and peaceful place for generations to come.

👉 Please join our cause to protect the Texas Hill Country and if you can... please donate.
Visit SaveBurnet.com to learn more, get involved, and make your voice heard. Together, we can make a difference and safeguard our community for future generations.

update 34 - two motions to overturn filed & Media coverage!

3/7/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,
We have some positive news to share regarding the Motion to Overturn (MTO) filed with TCEQ to challenge the approval of Asphalt Inc.'s Air Quality Permit. The fight to protect our Texas Hill Country is gaining momentum, and we are grateful for your continued support.

1. TWO Motions to Overturn Filed with TCEQ
The good news is that not just one but TWO Motions to Overturn have been filed:

1) State Representative Ellen Troxclair’s MTOWe are fortunate to have such a strong advocate in State Representative Ellen Troxclair, who has consistently supported our efforts to protect the Hill Country. Her MTO highlights the significant health and environmental risks posed by the proposed rock-crushing plant.
📄 To view a copy of Ellen Troxclair’s MTO, visit our SaveBurnet.com website or CLICK HERE.

2) MTO Filed by Attorney Larry G. BlackThe second MTO was filed by the Law Firm of Larry G. Black on behalf of Randy Printz and Nan Manning. Larry Black is an exceptional attorney with a proven track record of successfully litigating cases just like ours.
📢 This MTO calls out critical points, including where TCEQ has failed to perform its duties or live up to its mission statement:

🛡️ TCEQ’s Mission: “To protect public health and natural resources while supporting sustainable economic development.”
Key Highlights of the MTO:

The need for an environmental study to protect thousands of children from respiratory risks associated with the rock quarry.
Evidence that TCEQ failed to address critical environmental concerns, including a report from Dr. David L. Mitchell, Ph.D.

📄 To view a copy of this MTO and all of its attachments (A-F), visit our SaveBurnet.com website or CLICK HERE to view just the MTO.
📥 To download Dr. David L. Mitchell’s full report, CLICK HERE.

2. Positive Media Coverage!
Our cause is gaining important media attention, which is critical for raising awareness and keeping the pressure on.
📰 Today in The Highlander:The front page featured an article titled:
🗞️ “State Rep. Takes Steps to Block Crusher Permit”
This is yet another example of how Representative Ellen Troxclair is working tirelessly for her district and all Texans.
📝 Yesterday in The Burnet Bulletin:A thoughtful Letter to the Editor titled:
📰 “Despite Water Restrictions, TCEQ Grants Permit” by Jim and Ginny Jensen of Burnet.
We sincerely thank the Jensens for taking the time to write and share their perspective—it truly makes a difference!
📺 Airing Tonight on FOX7 News:Be sure to tune in to FOX7 with Lauren Rangel at:

9 PM, and 10 PM

The segment will provide an overview of our fight to stop the proposed Rock Crushing Plant.
This coverage will help us reach more people and amplify our message.

Stay Strong & Keep the Momentum Going!
As we continue this battle, we need everyone to remain positive and engaged. Each action you take—whether it's writing letters, sharing information, or simply talking to your neighbors--helps our cause.

💪 Together, united, we can and will protect our Texas Hill Country from this dangerous rock-crushing plant.
Thank you for being an integral part of this movement. Your voice matters!
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 33 - motion to overturn, water restrictions, air quality monitors & New legislation!

2/28/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have several important updates to share with you, covering the Motion to Overturn (MTO), LCRA water restrictions, air quality monitoring efforts, and a new bill introduced by State Representative Ellen Troxclair to protect our Hill Country.

1) Questions About the TCEQ Letter from Samuel Short
Many of you recently received a letter from Samuel Short, TCEQ’s Deputy Director of the Air Permits Division regarding Permit #176835. We’ve been receiving a lot of questions, so here are some answers:
a) The 23-Day Deadline for Filing a Motion to Overturn (MTO)The letter states that we have 23 days from the date of the letter (February 14th) to file an MTO. However, the postmark was February 20th, and most of us didn’t receive it until February 24th or 25th—meaning nearly half of our response time was lost.
We are currently looking into whether this delay was intentional, simple inefficiency, or incompetence. Regardless, this shortened timeframe makes it harder for multiple MTOs to be filed.
b) Mailing List Header: "PROTESTANTS/INTERESTED PERSONS"The letter includes a header stating "PROTESTANTS/INTERESTED PERSONS: See Attached List", but no list was included. Again, we are investigating whether this was an oversight or something more intentional.
c) Is SaveBurnet.com Filing a Motion to Overturn?✅ Yes! We have drafted an MTO and it will be filed next week. As soon as it is submitted, we will post it on the SaveBurnet.com website for transparency.

2) LCRA’s Plan for Additional Water Restrictions in March 2025
Several Hill Country news outlets (DailyTrib, Burnet Bulletin, Picayune, etc.) have covered LCRA’s upcoming water restrictions, set to take effect in March 2025. You can find details on our SaveBurnet.com website.
Many of you have asked:
❓ How can LCRA continue asking Hill Country residents to conserve water while other Texas agencies are granting permits to Asphalt Inc., allowing them to use over 9,000,000 gallons of water per month—just for dust suppression?
This is yet another reason why the proposed Rock Crushing Plant should not be built in its current location off Hoover Valley Road.

3) TCEQ Admits to Having NO Air Quality Monitors in Burnet County
During public comments, TCEQ publicly admitted that they do not have a single air quality monitor in Burnet County.
Additionally, in TCEQ’s Poor Response #6, they stated:
📌 “Due to cost and logistical constraints, the placement of air monitors is prioritized to provide data on regional air quality in areas frequented by the public.”
Meanwhile, SaveBurnet.com has been actively monitoring air quality:
✅ An Air Quality Monitor has been recording data for over 7 weeks.
✅ Solar-powered remote monitors are being installed around the proposed Rock Crushing Site off Hoover Valley Road.
✅ We just received 4 additional Air Quality Monitors, which will be installed and operational in March.
🔗 Visit SaveBurnet.com to see pictures of the solar units. Click Here, then scroll to the bottom of the page.

4) NEW BILL: State Rep. Ellen Troxclair Introduces House Bill #3482
Great news! Our State Representative Ellen Troxclair has introduced House Bill #3482, which would require environmental impact studies before permits can be issued for quarries or mining operations in sensitive areas.
📌 Key Provisions of HB #3482:
A quarry or mine cannot receive a permit unless a study confirms that it will not harm:
✔ Any lake owned or operated by LCRA (within 4 miles)
✔ The entrances to two or more state parks or caverns (within 4 miles)
✔ A youth camp licensed by the Department of State Health Services (within 2 miles)
When passed, this bill will go into effect in September 2025.
We will continue providing updates as this bill progresses through the legislative process. We are fortunate to have a representative who fights for Texans, and we encourage you to show your support for Ellen Troxclair and this important legislation.
🔗 Visit SaveBurnet.com to access or view House Bill #3482. Click Here.

Final Thoughts: Stay Engaged & Keep Fighting!
We know this fight is long and challenging, but we must stay strong. The TCEQ Air Permit was expected to be the easiest approval for Asphalt Inc., but we are far from done.
🔥 Our focus is now on the LCRA Permit. We need to ensure that LCRA requires Asphalt Inc. to conduct thorough environmental impact studies before approving any permits.
🚨 We still need more public comments submitted! So far over 2,000 objections have been filed--we are short of our goal!
📢 Make sure you submit your objection! Instructions and a link to the LCRA website are available on SaveBurnet.com.

Thank you all for your unwavering support. This is a battle worth fighting, and together, we will protect our Texas Hill Country!
💚 Stay strong, stay engaged, and keep spreading the word!
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 32 - answering your questions & Next Steps

2/22/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

First and foremost, thank you for your continued support, comments, and suggestions! Some of your feedback has been extremely helpful, while others brought a smile to our faces—we truly appreciate your passion and dedication to this cause.

Answering Your Most Asked Questions
1. When and Where is the LCRA Public Meeting?
Many of you have asked for details about the upcoming LCRA public meeting where we can voice our concerns.
➡ Answer: No official date, time, or location has been set yet. Based on past timelines, our best guess is that it will be held sometime in April or May. As soon as we have more details, we will notify you immediately and post all updates on SaveBurnet.com.

2. How Can We Defund TCEQ?
While this idea has certainly been suggested, a better approach would be to ask:
👉 How can we hold TCEQ accountable for performing their job per their mission statement?
TCEQ claims their goal is to “protect the public's health and natural resources while supporting economic development”, ensuring clean air, clean water, and safe waste management. However, they have failed to uphold these standards—instead, they have become little more than a rubber-stamp permitting department.

Here’s what we CAN do to hold them accountable:
✅ Contact your elected officials – Their contact information is available on SaveBurnet.com. Make sure they hear your voice loud and clear.
✅ Stay active in the SaveBurnet.com coalition – We need to keep applying pressure and making noise.
✅ Invite friends and family to join the fight – The more people involved, the stronger our movement.

TCEQ Air Permit Approved – But We’re Fighting Back
We always knew that the TCEQ Air Permit would be the easiest one for Asphalt Inc. to obtain. However, this does not mean the fight is over.
🚨 We will be filing a Motion to Overturn TCEQ’s approval of the air permit. 🚨
We will provide more details soon as this initiative progresses. Remember, the remaining permits will be much harder for them to obtain and will take more time.

⏳ Time is money—and our goal is to stretch this process out for years to make it as difficult as possible for Asphalt Inc. Stay steadfast and don’t get discouraged!

Focus on the LCRA Permit – Water Protection Matters!Now, our focus shifts to Asphalt Inc.’s LCRA permit, which determines how they will manage water runoff and prevent contamination to surrounding landowners, businesses, and state parks.

We need EVERYONE to take action!
👉 Submit your concerns to LCRA and demand that they require Asphalt Inc. to conduct thorough environmental assessments before considering permit approval.
📢 As of today, only 2,000 comments have been submitted—we are still short of our goal.
If you have not yet submitted your opposition, please do so immediately! Instructions and a link to the LCRA website are available on SaveBurnet.com.

A Fun Way to Support the Cause – Crossword Puzzle!
To bring some attention to our cause in a fun way, Jonell Kirk has created a custom crossword puzzle related to our fight against the quarry.
🔎 Check it out below! The answers are posted on the SaveBurnet.com homepage (scroll to the bottom).
We hope you enjoy it, and most importantly, stay strong, stay committed, and stay engaged. Together, we WILL protect Burnet County and the Texas Hill Country!

💚 Thank you for being part of this fight!
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 31 - urgent update: tceq approves asphalt inc.'s air quality permit

2/16/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We regret to inform you that TCEQ has officially approved Asphalt Inc.'s Air Quality Permit (#176835) despite overwhelming public opposition. More than 4,880 public comments were submitted against the proposed rock-crushing facility, yet TCEQ managed to reduce nearly 5,000 objections into just 17 questions, providing generic and weak responses in return.

The 17 Key Concerns and TCEQ’s Responses
After reviewing TCEQ’s official response, we have categorized their answers into the following themes:
Category 1: "TCEQ Does Not Have Authority"

Question 5: Water Concerns, Water Availability, and Other Required Authorizations – TCEQ states that water issues are not within their scope and should be addressed by other agencies.
Question 11: Location/Zoning/Historic Sites/Local Economy – TCEQ says they have no jurisdiction over land use, zoning, or economic impact.
Question 12: Truck Traffic/Roads/Public Infrastructure – TCEQ states that it does not regulate road use, traffic, or infrastructure concerns.
Question 13: Quality of Life/Property Values/Aesthetics – TCEQ claims it cannot consider quality of life, property values, or visual impacts in its decision-making.
Question 14: Noise/Light/Operating Hours – TCEQ states that noise and light pollution are outside their regulatory scope and should be handled by local authorities.
Question 15: Quarry/Mining/Blasting – TCEQ admits they do not regulate quarries or blasting activities, which are controlled by other federal agencies.

Category 2: "Cost Prohibitive"

Question 6: Air Quality Monitors – TCEQ says adding air monitors in Burnet County is not feasible due to cost and logistical constraints.

Category 3: "If a Violation Happens, You Can Report It"

Question 3: Dust Control/Nuisance/Winds – TCEQ acknowledges potential dust concerns but simply states that if a violation occurs, residents can report it.
Question 9: Complaints/Violations/Enforcement – TCEQ outlines a complaint process but places the burden on residents to prove violations.

Category 4: "Trust the Process"

Question 1: Health Effects / Air Quality / Cumulative Effects – TCEQ insists their "protectiveness review" ensures no harm, despite numerous public concerns.
Question 2: Environmental Concerns – TCEQ says emissions should not exceed national air quality standards and will not harm wildlife or plants.
Question 4: Environmental Impact Study – TCEQ refuses to conduct additional environmental studies, claiming their existing review is sufficient.
Question 7: Permit Review Process/Application Representations – TCEQ asserts that their review process is thorough and that applicants are required to be truthful.
Question 8: Demonstrate Compliance with Permit – TCEQ states that companies must self-monitor and submit reports but does not require third-party verification.
Question 10: Compliance History – TCEQ reviewed Asphalt Inc.'s compliance history but does not consider violations from other states.
Question 16: Financial Gain/Corporate Profits – TCEQ says they cannot consider financial motivations when reviewing permits.
Question 17: TCEQ’s Responsibility to the Community – TCEQ acknowledges public opposition but insists they must approve permits if the applicant meets minimal requirements.

Is This Helpful to Our Cause?
No. TCEQ’s responses fail to adequately address community concerns. Instead, they repeatedly shift responsibility to other agencies, dismiss calls for additional environmental review, and rely on self-regulation by the applicant.

What’s Next?
What Does This Mean for Our Fight?
As we anticipated, TCEQ acted as more of a permitting department than a regulatory agency concerned with public health and environmental protection. However, we must remember that this is only one battle--this was the easiest permit for Asphalt Inc. to obtain, and its approval does not change our strategy.

Our Next Steps

Filing a Motion to Overturn – We will now take legal action to challenge the approval of this permit.
Focusing on the Next Permits – The LCRA permit is still pending, and we need every supporter to submit opposition comments. Instructions are on SaveBurnet.com.
Keeping Up the Fight – We must remain engaged and continue to push back against this facility at every level.

A copy of TCEQ’s approval letter can be found here:
🔗 TCEQ Response to Air Permit #176835

Stay Strong – We Will Make a Difference
We only have one Texas Hill Country, and it is up to us to protect it. Thank you for your continued support, donations, and determination in this fight. Together, we can stop this Rock Crushing facility.

update 30 - Support from State representative ellen troxclair

2/16/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We are pleased to share that State Representative Ellen Troxclair has taken a strong stand in support of our fight to protect Burnet County from the devastating impact of the proposed rock-crushing facility. She is calling on all Texans to oppose this permit and demand hydrological and geological studies before approval.

Ellen recognizes the serious threats this facility poses to Camp Longhorn, Longhorn Caverns State Park, Inks Lake, and surrounding residents. The dust, noise, and water contamination risks are unacceptable, and we must continue to push back.

How You Can Help:
📧 Email LCRA at [email protected] and reference LCRA PERMIT #2024-5606
📢 Clearly state your opposition and request hydrological and geological studies before any permit is approved
🙌 Show support for Ellen by visiting her Facebook page and signing up for updates: Sign Up Here

We have also posted a copy of Ellen’s Facebook statement on SaveBurnet.com. Please take a moment to review it and share with others.

While we have secured a public meeting, we still need thousands more opposition comments to LCRA. Every voice counts, and we must act now.

Thank you for your unwavering support in protecting our Texas Hill Country!
— The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 29 - positive movement from our elected officials - keep the momentum going!

2/11/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have some encouraging news! Our efforts to protect the Texas Hill Country from the harmful impacts of unregulated rock quarries are gaining attention. Our elected officials are starting to take action!

A recent FOX 7 Austin article highlights two new Texas House bills aimed at addressing concerns about rock quarries and their effects on nearby communities. These bills focus on increasing oversight, improving regulations, and protecting residents from the environmental and health risks posed by these operations. This is exactly the kind of legislative attention we need to continue our fight.
📄 Click here to read the full article .

While this is a step in the right direction, our work is far from over. We must keep up the pressure, continue submitting our comments, questions and opposition to the LCRA, and ensure that lawmakers understand the full impact of these operations on our land, air, and water.

Thank you for your unwavering support, dedication, and donations—we could not do this without you! Together, we are making a difference.
Stay engaged, stay vocal, and stay strong!

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 28 - public meeting update, extended comment deadline, air quality monitoring efforts & request for donations

2/7/25

Dear Save Burnet Supporters,

We have several important updates to share in our fight to protect our Texas Hill Country:

LCRA Public Meeting Confirmed – Date TBD
LCRA has officially confirmed that a Public Meeting will be held regarding Asphalt Inc.’s permit application. However, the date, time, location, speaking rules, and meeting format have not yet been set. As soon as we have these details, we will inform you immediately.

Opposition Comment Deadline Extended
The original Feb. 7th deadline has been extended until the close of the Public Meeting. That means there is still time to submit opposition comments! If you, your family, or your neighbors have not yet done so, please act now. Every comment counts.

Air Quality Monitoring – Taking Action Where TCEQ Has Not
Shockingly, TCEQ does not have a single air quality monitor in Burnet County—but we do!
✅ Active Monitor: SaveBurnet.com has already set up an air quality monitor on Hoover Valley Road.
✅ Upcoming Monitor: This month, we will install a second monitor in Spicewood next to the existing Asphalt Inc. rock crushing plants.
✅ More Coming Soon: We have purchased four additional air quality monitors that will be installed across the surrounding area.
All of these monitors will be added to the national air quality map and made publicly available for everyone to track.

We Need Your Help – Donate to Protect Our Hill Country
To continue our efforts, we need funding for:
🔹 Additional air quality monitors
🔹 Ads in local newspapers to spread awareness
🔹 Updated signs and posters to inform the community

Please remember that SaveBurnet.com is a fully volunteer-run effort—our committee and staff are working pro bono and have not taken a single dollar for their services.

If you believe in preserving our land, air, and water, please consider donating to this important cause. Every contribution makes a difference!

Thank You for Your Support!
We are incredibly grateful for the loyal and passionate community standing together to protect our Texas Hill Country.
Together, we can and will make a difference.

- The SaveBurnet,com Team

update 27 - encouraging news - lcra asking tough questions & Public meeting confirmed!

2/3/25

Dear Save Burnet Supporters,

We have some good news to share in our ongoing fight to protect our Texas Hill Country!

1) LCRA is Asking the Right Questions
While the TCEQ response has been slow and unhelpful, LCRA appears to be taking a more thorough and technical approach in reviewing Asphalt Inc.'s permit application.
LCRA has submitted a detailed review letter with 64 technical questions that Asphalt Inc. and their engineering firm (Westward) must address.
To view or download a copy of this letter, visit SaveBurnet.com:
📌 Go to "Reference Material" in the navigation menu
📌 Select "Water Related Info"
📌 Find "LCRA’s Review Letter Submitted to Asphalt Inc."

2) Comment Deadline Extended & Public Meeting Confirmed!
More good news: The Feb. 7th deadline for submitting opposition comments has been extended until the close of the Public Meeting! That means we have more time to submit concerns and opposition to LCRA.

3) Keep Submitting Your Opposition & Concerns
We must continue sending LCRA our opposition comments. To help spark ideas, we are sharing a letter from William "Bill" McCartney, who raised a great question:
"What happens when temperatures drop below freezing? Will the rock crushing plant stop spraying water and shut down? Or will they continue running while failing to control dust pollution?"
Bill's letter is attached and is just one of many valid concerns that need to be addressed. If you have questions, now is the time to submit them to LCRA. Do not wait—send yours in today!

4) KXAN News Coverage Tonight
KXAN will be airing a special segment tonight covering the impact this proposed rock crushing plant will have on our groundwater supply and the risk of contaminated runoff flowing into Inks Lake and Lake LBJ. Be sure to tune in and help spread the word!

Call to Action
We are making progress, but we cannot slow down now. Keep submitting your comments, encouraging your neighbors to do the same, and staying engaged.

As always, we are incredibly grateful for your support, donations, and dedication to protecting our Hill Country.
Together, we are stronger!
- The Save Burnet Team

update 26 - keep the pressure on - we need more opposition comments!

1/31/25

Dear Save Burnet Supporters,

First and foremost, thank you to everyone who has submitted their opposition and requested a public meeting with the LCRA! Your voices have made a difference—with over 1,000 comments submitted, LCRA will hold a public meeting.
However, our work is far from over.

We set a goal of 5,000 comments, and we are still way behind. While a public meeting is secured, we need thousands more comments to ensure that LCRA takes this issue seriously and conducts necessary hydrological and geological studies before considering Asphalt Inc.'s permit application.

Why This Matters
We cannot allow the possibility of contaminated runoff water from this rock crushing plant to flow into Inks Lake and the fish hatchery at Lake LBJ. If we do not keep pushing, this permit could be approved without proper environmental oversight.

What You Need to Do Right Now:
✅ Submit your opposition to LCRA (visit SaveBurnet.com for instructions and links).
✅ When submitting, include these three critical points:
1️⃣ Your opposition to the permit.
2️⃣ A request for a Public Meeting.
3️⃣ A request for hydrological and geological studies before the permit is approved.
✅ Encourage at least 5 others (friends, family, neighbors) to submit their comments.
✅ Share this message on social media and within your community.

Strength in Numbers
We have the momentum, but we must keep pushing. The more opposition we generate, the harder it will be for LCRA to ignore the serious risks this project poses to our land, water, and way of life.
Time is running out—submit your opposition today!

Thank you for standing with us in this fight. God bless Texas, and God bless America.
- The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 25 - urgent: submit your opposition to lcra permit before february 7th!

1/24/25

Dear Save Burnet Supporters,

The time is now to take action and make your voice heard! The deadline to submit your opposition and request a public meeting with LCRA regarding Asphalt Inc.'s permit application is February 7th, 2025. We are targeting 5,000+ submissions opposing this permit, and your participation is critical to achieving that goal.

For additional details about the dangers of this permit, including its impact on groundwater usage and water runoff, we encourage you to view the presentation on the SaveBurnet.com website. CLICK HERE to go directly to the webpage and scroll down to the section titled "Water Concerns Related to the Proposed Rock Crushing Plant at 3221 FM 3509, Burnet Texas."

This permit is even more important than the TCEQ air permit. If approved, it would allow Asphalt Inc. to jeopardize our way of life and the pristine beauty of our Texas Hill Country. Please don’t delay—file your comments today!

You can CLICK HERE for the link that will take you to the LCRA website. Additional information on submitting your comments is also available on the SaveBurnet.comwebsite.

Exciting News: Our First Air Monitor Is Live!
We are thrilled to share that our first air monitor is now operational, and live air quality data is available on the SaveBurnet.com website. CLICK HERE to go directly to the Air Quality Map page and see the results in real-time.
In the coming weeks, we will be installing additional monitors across Burnet County and improving the website to give our community even better access to critical air quality information. This is a vital step in holding companies like Asphalt Inc. accountable for the environmental impact of their operations.

Call to Action
We cannot overstate how important it is for each and every one of us to submit comments opposing Asphalt Inc.'s LCRA permit and to request a public meeting. There is strength in numbers, and our success depends on all of us acting together.

Please share this message with your family, friends, and neighbors—encourage them to join us in protecting our Texas Hill Country.

Together, we can make a difference. Together, we will protect the air, water, and land that make our community special.
Thank you for your continued support and dedication. Let’s reach that 5,000-comment goal and show LCRA that Burnet County stands united!

With determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 24 - fighting for clean air and water

1/18/25

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We hope this message finds you well. Thank you for your continued support and dedication to protecting our community. Here are important updates regarding the ongoing efforts to stop the proposed rock-crushing plant and protect the air and water in Burnet County.

1. TCEQ Air Quality Permit #176835
Many of you have asked about the status of TCEQ’s Air Quality Permit #176835. As of now, TCEQ has not made a decision.
According to the Texas Administrative Code and TCEQ’s Public Interest Counsel, the Executive Director has 60 days to make a decision after the last public comment period ends. For this permit, that deadline appears to be February 7th, 2025.
Remember, this air permit is the easiest permit to obtain in this process. Please stay tuned, and we’ll notify you as soon as we hear any updates.

2. Air Quality Monitors
One of the most critical revelations from the December 10th public meeting was the acknowledgment by a TCEQ representative that Burnet County does not have a single air quality monitor. TCEQ stated that the closest monitoring station is in Leander, TX. After further investigation, TCEQ's closest Air Monitoring station is in Austin, upwind and over 45 miles away!
This is unacceptable for Burnet County, which is the second-fastest-growing county in Texas and already has over 15 active Aggregate Production Operations (APOs) in operation. How is TCEQ monitoring and enforcing the current air quality standards?
To address this gap, the SaveBurnet committee has taken action:
·        We have purchased and are installing air quality monitors in multiple locations across Burnet County to establish a baseline for air quality.
·        Monitors will also be installed near all operational Asphalt Inc. APO sites.
By next month, you’ll be able to log in to our website and view real-time air quality data. A summary of TCEQ's air monitoring stations and additional insights are available on our website—please click here and then scroll down to "TCEQ Air Monitoring Stations (none in Burnet County)" to review the presentation.
We’ll share more about the air monitoring efforts in future updates.

3. Importance of Opposing the LCRA Permit
Many of you have seen signs around Burnet County urging residents and businesses to conserve water due to dangerously low water levels. Some wells have gone dry, forcing residents to haul water or rely on rainwater collection.
The introduction of a rock-crushing plant will place an enormous strain on local water resources. At the December 10th public meeting, Ben Liggett, COO of Asphalt Inc., was asked how much water the proposed plant would use. His response: He did not know.
Based on Asphalt Inc.’s Air Permit #176835, we estimate the plant could use 648,000 to 9,720,000 gallons of water per month—equivalent to the water usage of a subdivision with 100 to 1,000 homes. Detailed calculations are available on our website—please click here  and then scroll down to "Water Usage Calculation for Dust Abatement only" to review.
It’s critical that you submit your opposition to LCRA and request a public meeting. Instructions and additional details are on the SaveBurnet.com website.

Together, We Can Make a Difference
This fight is about more than opposing one rock-crushing plant. It’s about protecting the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the natural beauty of the Texas Hill Country for generations to come.
Unity is our strength. By working together as a united team, we can preserve our precious Hill Country. Every comment, every action, and every voice matters.

Thank you for staying engaged and committed for the long haul. Together, we will protect the place we call home.

With gratitude and determination,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 23 - a united effort to protect texas hill country in 2025

1/10/25

Dear Save Burnet Supporters,

We hope you had a wonderful Christmas and a Happy New Year! Your incredible support throughout 2024 has been the backbone of our efforts, and we couldn’t have come this far without you. As we step into 2025, your dedication will be more vital than ever as we continue our fight to protect our beloved Hill Country.

Important Update on LCRA Permit
Last night, we sent out Update #22 in a hurry to ensure you had the opportunity to log on to the LCRA website and submit your comments. If you missed it, don’t worry! The instructions and links to the LCRA website mentioned in Update #22 are now available on our website, SaveBurnet.com.
On our website, you’ll also find a copy of the 65-page LCRA application and the official notice that many of you who live near the proposed quarry site will receive in the mail today or tomorrow.

What You Need to Know
Many of you have asked whether this application is different from the previous one you commented on. The answer is yes.

Previous Permit (176835): Related to Air Quality, filed with TCEQ.
Current Application (#2024-5606 ): Filed with LCRA and pertains to watershed ordinance requirements.

While the permits address different aspects of the proposed rock-crushing plant, the process for submitting your comments remains similar.

How You Can Take Action

Visit the link provided in the flyer or on SaveBurnet.com.
Submit your opposition to the application.
Request a public meeting.

It’s crucial that we gather as many comments and public meeting requests as possible. While the LCRA website will be open for a couple of weeks, submitting your comments sooner rather than later strengthens our position.

Together, We Can Make a Difference
This fight is about more than just a rock-crushing plant; it’s about preserving the safety, health, and beauty of our Hill Country for future generations. Your voice matters, and your unity is our greatest strength.
Also, if you haven’t seen it yet, The Daily Tribune published a compelling article today titled "Rock Crusher applies for LCRA permit." Be sure to check it out for additional context.

Thank you for standing with us. Let’s keep up the momentum and show the strength of our community.

With gratitude and hope,
The SaveBurnet.com Committee
SaveBurnet.com

update 22 - urgent call to action, please see attached flyer for details

1/9/25

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

Please read the attached flyer, we need everyone to provide LCRA your comments / objections and request a public meeting.

Additional information is also available at the SaveBurnet.com website.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Committee

update 21 - important information about central texas groundwater conservation district

12/20/25

Dear Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

As we’ve previously shared, obtaining a TCEQ air quality permit is one of the easiest steps for a proposed rock quarry. Unfortunately, this process does not rely on localized data, as there is not a single TCEQ air quality monitor in Burnet County. While we will continue to oppose the air permit, our focus is shifting toward the upcoming water permit, where we see an opportunity to protect our resources and make a greater impact.

Collaborating with Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District
We are actively working with the Central Texas Groundwater Conservation District (CTGCD) to map existing wells near the proposed quarry site. CTGCD plans to monitor four deep water wells surrounding the area to assess the potential impact of quarry operations on our groundwater.
Here’s an update on the progress:

Well Monitoring Progress: My well at 3610 FM 3509 and another well owned by one of our supporters who also lives on FM 3509 have already been tested in preparation for ongoing monitoring.
Additional Locations Needed: CTGCD has identified two more wells to monitor, one on Patton Trail and another on FM 3509. We’ve contacted the owners of these wells and are awaiting their response.

Why Allow Your Well to Be Monitored?

Know Your Water Level and Depth: The water table in Burnet County has been dropping by 2-5 feet annually. Testing your well now will provide crucial insights into its current depth and water level, helping you predict its long-term health and sustainability.
Establish a Baseline for Future Protection: If, in the unfortunate event the quarry becomes operational and wells in the area begin to dry up, having a baseline record of your well’s depth and water levels will be invaluable. This data is critical in litigation and can help protect your rights as a property owner.

CTGCD: A Valuable Partner, Not a Threat
CTGCD’s role is to evaluate and manage water resources responsibly. They are not here to monitor your personal water usage but to help ensure sustainable groundwater for all. Their partnership offers an opportunity to gather essential data about the health of our aquifers and the impact of potential developments.

To learn more about CTGCD, we’ve included their contact information and a link to their website, where you can view all wells currently on record. Many wells in the area are unregistered or have outdated contact details.

How You Can Help:

Register Your Well: Contact CTGCD to ensure your well is listed and your contact information is up to date.
Free Well Measurements: CTGCD offers free measurements of your well’s depth and water level. Take advantage of this service to better understand your well’s status. The nice young man that came out and measured our wells was "Shrader Davis".
Reach Out: If you have concerns about working with CTGCD, visit their office on the Burnet City square or give them a call (contact information is below). They are approachable and committed to helping our community.

Moving Forward Together
Whether we win or lose the air permit battle, we remain united in our commitment to challenging the proposed rock quarry and protecting our beautiful Texas Hill Country. Together, we will make a difference and safeguard our water, air, and land for generations to come.

Thank you for your continued support,
SaveBurnet.com Team

P.S. Visit the CTGCD website to learn more about their work and see how you can get involved:
Click HERE to access the CTGCD contact information.
Click HERE to access the CTGCD well location map

update 20 - summary of the december 10th tceq meeting

12/21/24

Dear Supporters,

Thank you for your continued commitment to protecting Burnet County from the environmental and health risks posed by the proposed quarry and rock crushing facility on Hoover Valley Road. We know many of you were unable to attend the public meeting on December 10th, so here’s a summary of what transpired.

The meeting, hosted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), was a powerful display of community engagement. Approximately 800 people attended, with 550 signing in and 100 registering to speak. Due to the meeting extending well past 11:00 PM, some speakers had to leave, but a total of 91 individuals voiced their objections to the permit application.

One of our Committee members, William McCartney, wrote a compelling Op-Ed that not only summarizes the meeting but also highlights critical facts that were revealed. His piece is included below for your reference.

We are also thrilled to share that the total number of comments submitted to TCEQ on permit #176835 has now surpassed 4,800, setting a new state record! This achievement reflects the strength of our community and the urgency of this issue. We sincerely thank all who submitted comments, attended the meeting, and spoke passionately on behalf of our shared cause.
A special thank you goes to William McCartney for his insightful Op-Ed, which underscores the importance of holding TCEQ accountable for protecting our air quality.

William McCartney’s Op-Ed: TCEQ representatives stated that the only issue under consideration at this time is the impact the proposed quarry would have on air quality. While opponents voiced concerns about water runoff issues, significant negative impacts on aquifers (with estimated water usage of roughly 50,000 gallons per hour or 400,000 gallons over an 8-hour period and up to 600,000 gallons over a 12-hour operating day), and other environmental hazards, TCEQ made it clear that these issues would only be addressed after the current application is approved. During the meeting, one of the Commission’s representatives made a stunning admission that should spark outrage among policymakers and residents—not just in Burnet County, but across the state. TCEQ admitted that there are no air quality monitors in Burnet County or the surrounding area. The agency tasked with protecting the quality of Texas air collects no data in an area saturated with rock crushing operations, which are known to release pollutants into the air. One speaker mentioned that there may be a single air monitor in Llano and perhaps one in Cedar Park, but none in Burnet County itself. This is, frankly, beyond belief. Anyone who has driven through Burnet County knows the area is home to numerous quarry and rock crushing operations. For example, driving along Highway 281 between Marble Falls and Burnet reveals a string of rock crushers on the east side. Additionally, there are multiple quarries on Fairland Road and along Highways 71 and 29, as well as in other locations. Despite the presence of these operations—discharging dust containing harmful particulates, including carcinogens—TCEQ does not monitor the air quality in Burnet County. Now, the agency is on the verge of approving another rock crushing facility without the ability to tell residents whether the county’s air quality already exceeds acceptable limits. These quarries may already pose a severe health risk, yet the regulatory agency charged with safeguarding Texas’ air quality has no way of determining whether the existing operations are endangering public health. TCEQ—do the right thing. Put this application on hold until air monitoring equipment is installed and sufficient time is given to establish an air quality baseline for the air that we, our animals, and our vegetation depend on to survive. Protecting air quality is your responsibility. It’s time to act.

Let’s keep this momentum going! Your voices are making a difference, and together, we can demand better for our community and future generations.
Thank you for standing with us.

Warm regards,
SaveBurnet.com Team

update 19 - urgent update: submit your comments to Tceq during tonight's public meeting

12/10/24

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We have an important update for those who are unable to attend tonight’s TCEQ Public Meeting in person:

TCEQ will allow written comments to be submitted on their website during the meeting. This means you still have a couple of hours to make your voice heard while the meeting is taking place. However, time is short! As soon as the meeting is adjourned, the opportunity to submit comments via the TCEQ website will close.

Here’s how to submit your comments:
1️⃣ Use this link: TCEQ Online Comment Submission
2️⃣ Enter Permit Number: 176835
3️⃣ Complete the form and submit your comments.
Important Note, don't forget to hit submit at the bottom of the TCEQ page.

In your comments, please make sure to voice your strong opposition to the proposed rock crushing plant and explain the impact it would have on our community, environment, and health.

This is your chance to make a difference, even if you cannot attend the meeting in person. Together, we can protect our beautiful Hill Country and preserve it for future generations.

Thank you for your quick action and continued support!

In solidarity,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 18 - new additions to saveburnet.com + important reminder for tomorrow's public meeting

12/9/24

Dear Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

We’re thrilled to share three exciting updates now available on the SaveBurnet.com website:

1️⃣ New Presentation Mapping Quarry Impacts:
One of our dedicated supporters has created a detailed presentation that maps and provides statistics on other rock crushing quarries. This resource highlights the alarming proximity (just 3 miles) of the proposed quarry site to two state parks and the Highland Lakes water supply.

2️⃣ Geological Map from Tyson Broad:
Tyson Broad has provided a geological map of Hoover Valley Road, showing the proposed site of the rock crushing plant along with fault lines in the area. This critical information underscores the potential risks to our land and water.

3️⃣ Download “Between a Rock and a Hard Place” – Our New Anthem:
We are proud to share the hit song, "Between a Rock and a Hard Place," written by Burnet’s own talented Randy Wright and performed by Jeff Haese. This song champions our cause and opposes the proposed quarry. Download it now at SaveBurnet.com and let it inspire you as we continue this fight!

🎤 TOMORROW’S PUBLIC MEETING – MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!
This is a crucial moment in our efforts. We need everyone to show up in full force to make an impact. Here are the details:
Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
Time: Meeting begins at 7:00 PM (arrive 20–40 minutes early to sign up to speak)
Location: Hill Country Fellowship Church, 200 Houston Clinton Drive, Burnet, TX 78611
Speaker Sign-Up:

Arrive early if you wish to speak sooner, as the sign-up order determines when you will be called.

Meeting Format:

First Part: Ask questions directed at TCEQ and the applicant. (These will not be documented by TCEQ)
Second Part: Share your concerns and opinions (up to 3 minutes per speaker and will be documented by TCEQ).

Even Brief Statements Matter:
Your presence and voice are powerful! Even if your statement is as simple as giving your name and saying you oppose the plant, it makes a difference. The goal is to have as many voices as possible speaking out against this quarry.

💚 Wear Green for Unity
We ask everyone to wear green—preferably your “Stop the Rock Crusher” T-shirts (available on our website). A unified sea of green will send a powerful message to officials, the applicant, and the media.

Together, We Are Stronger
We are at a critical juncture, but together, we can protect our community, our state parks, and the beautiful Texas Hill Country for generations to come. Each of us has a role to play, and by standing united, we can overcome this challenge.
Thank you for your continued support, and we look forward to seeing you all tomorrow. Let’s make our voices heard loud and clear!

In unity and hope,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 17 - important information from lbca supporting our fight

12/5/24

Dear SaveBurnet.com Supporters,

We are forwarding an important email from the Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance (LBCA), a dedicated organization committed to protecting the Highland Lakes community. LBCA has been a steadfast supporter of SaveBurnet.com’s efforts to oppose the proposed rock-crushing plant, and we are fortunate to have them as an ally in this fight.

In this email, LBCA provides detailed and valuable insights, including:

The proximity of key Texas landmarks to the proposed rock-crushing plant site, highlighting the potential risks to these cherished areas.
The alarming state of the ongoing drought and low water flow into the Highland Lakes, which amplifies the potential environmental impact of the plant.
A summary of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s letter to TCEQ, which raises serious concerns about adverse impacts on Texas fish and wildlife resources, the outdoor environment, and the health of park visitors.

We encourage you to take the time to read LBCA’s detailed analysis. Their work is invaluable, and their support strengthens our cause. Please consider supporting LBCA as they continue to advocate for the health and well-being of our community.

Together, with allies like LBCA, we are building a coalition strong enough to protect our Hill Country for generations to come.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11:15 PM
Subject: Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance Special Action Alert - Rock Crushing Plant - TCEQ Public Meeting Notice
To: <[email protected]>

To: Save Burnet, Randy Printz
Hi everyone,
This is a special action alert. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has scheduled a public meeting concerning the proposed rock crushing plant on FM 3509. Lots of information. Please read to the end.
Here is the time and location:
Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 7:00 PM
Hill Country Fellowship
200 Houston Clinton Drive
Burnet, Texas 78611
We need to have as many supporters in attendance as possible. Please plan to arrive early and WEAR GREEN to show our solidarity.
The meeting will be broken down into two parts.
First, a question and answer session. Questions and answers are informational only and will not be considered in the final decision.
Second, is a formal comment period. There will be a table at the front to sign up to speak. Speakers will be given 3 min each. Comments WILL BE considered during the decision process.
Three minute time slots go by in a flash. Please have comments written and ready to present.
Here are a few, but not all the talking points to consider.
1. "Save Burnet" is the name of the excellent coalition formed to protest this proposal. However, the affected area is much larger than Burnet County and, as shown below, encompasses the entire Lake Buchanan area along with much of Llano County. It also affects Northwestern Travis County.
2. This proposal affects the most environmentally sensitive area in the Highland Lakes Region. (see below)
3. The dust produced by this plant would devastate the grape crops of at least five vineyards in Burnet, Llano and Travis Counties.
4. The plant would directly affect the environmental quality of Inks Lake State Park, which is one of the most beautiful, and most visited of all Texas State Parks.
5. The Longhorn Cavern Park and cave system is within three miles of the proposed site. The explosions required to mine the rocks would be devastating to this nearly 100 year old Texas gem built in the 1930's by the CCC.
6. Dust produced by the plant can travel up to 30 miles. Smaller particles can travel up to 50 miles.
7. A rock crushing plant uses 1.5 million gallons of water per month, or the equivalent usage of 265 families.
8. Currently, there is not a published plan to deal with the used water?
9. The Highland Lakes and the groundwater beneath them are the main source of drinking water for the Austin and Central Texas Region. We are already in a prolonged, severe drought situation. Every drop counts.
10. Beside drinking water, The Highland Lakes system also provides water for agriculture.
11. Truck traffic from the plant would very adversly affect the already congested roads in the area.

There will be more on this to come. Please go to https://www.saveburnet.com/for updated information

Here is a copy of the protest letter from LBCA that was hand delivered to the TCEQ office:

Texas Parks and Wildlife has written a formal letter raising "concerns regarding potential adverse impacts on the fish and wildlife resources of Texas, as well as impacts to the outdoor environment and the health of Park visitors".
Here is their letter:

Again, please come let your voice be heard. Please be there early and be sure to WEAR GREEN in solidarity.

Your continued support is so much appreciated!

If you are interested in becoming a member, you may download our membership application here:
Membership Applications

Please follow us on social media here:
Facebook:
LBCA Facebook
Twitter:
LBCA Twitter - X

Please consider joining with us. With your help, we have a chance to do something important for our community.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
The Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance
Copyright © 2024 Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our Contact information is:
Phone: 512-775-3689 or 512-441-5606
[email protected]

Lake Buchanan Communities Alliance
PO Box 11
Buchanan Dam, TX 78609
Add us to your address book

update 16 - continuing the fight together

12/2/24

We hope you all had a wonderful Thanksgiving, filled with family, gratitude, and joy. As we reflect on what we are thankful for, we want to recognize you, our incredible supporters, for your unwavering commitment to preserving our beloved Texas Hill Country.

Preparation Session: December 3rd
As the critical December 10th TCEQ Public Meeting approaches, we want to remind you that SaveBurnet.com has rented the Reed Building for a dry run session:

Date & Time: Sunday, December 3rd, from 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM
Location: Reed Building, 402 E. Jackson Street, Burnet, TX 78611

This is a valuable opportunity for anyone planning to speak at the meeting. You can practice, refine, or even seek guidance on your presentation. The SaveBurnet.com committee will be on hand to provide support and answer any questions.

TCEQ Public Meeting: December 10th
This meeting is critical, and we need a massive turnout to make an impact. Here are the details:

Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
Time: Meeting begins at 7:00 PM (arrive 20-40 minutes early to sign up to speak)
Location: Hill Country Fellowship Church, 200 Houston Clinton Drive, Burnet, TX 78611

Speaker Sign-Up
Many have asked about speaking early. Please note that the order of speakers is determined by the sign-up sheet, so arrive early if you wish to speak sooner.

First Part of the Meeting: Ask questions directed at TCEQ and the applicant.
Second Part of the Meeting: Share your concerns and opinions (up to 3 minutes per speaker).

Remember: Even a brief statement is impactful. Simply giving your name and stating your opposition to the plant is incredibly effective. The goal is to have as many voices as possible.

Show Up in Green
We ask that everyone wear green to the meeting—preferably your “Stop the Rock Crusher” T-shirts (available on our website). This visual display of unity will send a powerful message to local and state officials, the applicant, and the media.

Growing Momentum and Support
Our coalition continues to grow, and our message is being heard. Texas Parks and Wildlife has joined our fight, submitting a formal letter to TCEQ and confirming their participation at the December 10th public meeting. (Please see attached Letter, which is also posted on the SaveBurnet.com website)

The Fight Is Just Beginning
As a reminder, the TCEQ Air Permit is just the first hurdle. Regardless of the outcome, this is only the beginning of a longer battle to protect our Hill Country. Asphalt Inc./Construction Partners Inc. will face numerous obstacles in the coming years, and with your steadfast support, we will be there every step of the way to oppose their efforts.

Together, We Can Make a Difference
Let’s stand as one united team to protect the landmarks, natural beauty, and way of life that make our Texas Hill Country so special. With your help, we can stop this rock-crushing plant and ensure a brighter future for generations to come.

Thank you for your continued dedication. Together, we will prevail.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 15 - a big thank you and final push for december 10th

11/22/24

To our incredible supporters,

First, a heartfelt thank you to everyone who has volunteered to speak at the upcoming TCEQ meeting and to those who have worked tirelessly to distribute thousands of meeting flyers. Your dedication is making a real difference.

For those who still need flyers, a downloadable copy is available on the SaveBurnet.com website (located at the bottom of the "Take Action" page). Please share it widely with your neighbors, friends, and local businesses to help us spread the word.

Strength in Numbers: December 10th TCEQ Meeting
As we approach the December 10th TCEQ Public Meeting, it cannot be stressed enough how critical it is to have a huge turnout. We need as many people as possible to sign up and speak to ensure our voices are heard. As of today we have confirmed the we will have speakers and representation from the following offices:

Willie Gonzalez - Pete Flores office - State Senator
Stacy Smith & Ciara Hall, Ellen Troxclair’s office- State Representative
Jim Luther, Precinct 1 Commissioner
Martha Tyroch, Dawn Buckingham's Office, Texas Land Commissioner
Gary Wideman, Mayor of Burnet
James Oakley, Burnet County Judge

Meeting Details:

Date & Time: Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 7:00 PM
Location: Hill Country Fellowship Church, 200 Houston Clinton Drive, Burnet, TX 78611
Arrival Time: Please arrive 20–40 minutes early to sign up to speak.

Speaking Guidelines:The meeting will have two parts:

Informal Discussion Period: Ask questions about the permit and operations.
Formal Comment Period: Speak for up to 3 minutes to voice your concerns.

Your speech does not have to be long. Simply stating your name and expressing your opposition to the plant is incredibly impactful. The goal is to have a large number of speakers to show the depth of community opposition.

Preparation Session: December 3rd
To help you feel confident, we have rented the Reed Building for a dry-run session:

Date & Time: Tuesday, December 3, 2024, from 4:00–7:00 PM
Location: Reed Building, 402 E. Jackson Street, Burnet, TX 78611

The SaveBurnet.com committee will be there to assist with speech preparation and answer any questions.

What’s Coming Next

Starting next week, look for half-page ads in local newspapers, as well as advertisements and commentary in our community papers and on local radio stations.
Large 4'x4' signs announcing the December 10th meeting will begin appearing around town in the coming days, similar to the one pictured below.

Let’s Show Our Unity
Please wear green to the meeting and, if possible, your green “Stop the Rock Crusher” T-shirts. These shirts are available through our website.

Together, we are sending a clear message: Our community stands united in protecting the Texas Hill Country.
Thank you for your ongoing commitment and hard work. Let’s keep the momentum strong and make December 10th a day of action and solidarity.

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Committee

update 14 - let's make a stand on december 10th!

11/15/24

To all SaveBurnet.com supporters,

The TCEQ Public Meeting on December 10, 2024, at 7:00 PM, is a pivotal moment in our fight to stop the proposed rock crushing plant. We need every single one of you to show up, stand united, and make your voices heard.

Strength in Numbers
A large turnout will send a powerful message about our community’s opposition to this project. Bring your family, friends, and neighbors—this is the time to act.
As a show of unity, we are asking everyone to wear green, preferably your green “Stop the Rock Crusher” T-shirts. If you don’t have one yet, visit our website for ordering information.

Meeting Details

Date & Time: Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 7:00 PM
Location: Hill Country Fellowship Church, 200 Houston Clinton Drive, Burnet, TX 78611
Arrival Time: Please arrive 20–40 minutes early to sign up to speak.

Speaking at the Meeting
The meeting will be divided into two parts:

Informal Discussion Period: Ask questions about the permit and operations.
Formal Comment Period: Each speaker will have up to 3 minutes to voice their opposition.

You don’t need to use the full 3 minutes. A simple statement of your name and your opposition to the plant is incredibly valuable. The more speakers we have, the stronger our message.

Prepare with Us
To help everyone feel confident, we’ve rented the Reed Building for a dry-run session:

Date & Time: Tuesday, December 3, 2024, from 4:00–7:00 PM
Location: Reed Building, 402 E. Jackson Street, Burnet, TX 78611

The SaveBurnet.com committee will be there to answer questions and provide guidance for your presentation.

Help Spread the Word
We’re printing new flyers this weekend to announce the December 10th meeting. While we have volunteers covering local neighborhoods, we need more help distributing flyers to local businesses and asking them to display them in their windows.
If you can volunteer to hand out flyers, please sign up in the comments section of our website and indicate your interest. A committee member will contact you with further instructions.

Let’s Save Our Hill Country
Remember, there is strength in numbers. Together, we can stop this project and preserve the beauty of our Texas Hill Country. Show up, speak out, and stay united—we will prevail!
Thank you for your continued dedication. Let’s make December 10th a day to remember!

Sincerely,
The SaveBurnet.com Team

update 13 - working together to protect our hill country

11/1/24

Dear Supporters,

Update on Construction Partners Inc.
In update #12 we covered the recent acquisition of Asphalt Inc. LLC by Construction Partners Inc. (CPI). Currently our legal team is working tirelessly to find the best avenues to engage with the new owner "CPI". Our aim is to educate CPI on the significant political and environmental impacts their proposed rock-crushing plant would have on the unique beauty of our Texas Hill Country and nearby state parks. We are committed to making sure they fully understand the risks and community concerns around this project.

Help Us Protect Our Environment: Identifying Endangered Bird Species
You can support our cause by helping to identify any endangered bird species in the Burnet, Texas area. Documenting the presence of these birds can help protect critical habitat and provide a stronger case against the quarry. To aid in this effort, we recommend using the Merlin Bird ID app, an easy-to-use tool developed by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology that helps users identify birds in real time.
How to Get Started with Merlin Bird IDDownload the Merlin App:

For Android: Go to the Google Play Store and search for Merlin Bird ID by Cornell Lab.
For iPhone: Go to the Apple App Store and search for Merlin Bird ID by Cornell Lab.

Once installed, simply open the app and follow the prompts to download a bird pack for your region (choose Texas for the most relevant results). To identify a bird, just answer a few questions about its color, size, and location or upload a photo if possible. While using the microphone on your phone Merlin will provide likely matches, helping you confirm the species.

Why Your Observations Matter
By helping us track endangered species like the Golden-cheeked Warbler, already spotted in our area, you’ll be contributing valuable information to our conservation efforts. Camp Buckner, just a few miles away, has already identified two endangered species, the Fan-tailed Hawk and Yellow-billed Cuckoo, on their property. Your findings could be crucial for strengthening our case to preserve this land.

Keeping the Momentum Going
We deeply appreciate your donations to our GoFundMe page and the checks mailed in. Every contribution fuels our efforts, allowing us to keep up this important fight. Your support is what keeps us moving forward.

Together, we can and will stop this rock quarry from being built. Thank you for standing with us to protect the beauty of Burnet.

With gratitude,
The SaveBurnet.com Committee
SaveBurnet.com

update 12 - asphalt inc., llc purchased by construction partners inc.

10/25/24

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

We wanted to take a moment to update you on a significant development regarding the company seeking to build a rock crushing plant off of Hoover Valley Road. Asphalt Inc., LLC has recently been acquired by a large publicly traded company known as Construction Partners Inc. (NASDAQ: ROAD).

Overview of Construction Partners Inc.
Construction Partners Inc. is a leading infrastructure company specializing in the production of asphalt and other construction materials. The firm operates numerous locations across the southeastern United States and is focused on growth and expansion, particularly within Texas. Their strategic vision includes increasing their production capacity to meet the demands of a rapidly growing market. This acquisition raises questions about what it may mean for our cause; while we do not yet know if this transition will help or hurt our efforts to protect the Texas Hill Country, we remain steadfast in our commitment to advocate for our community.

We extend our heartfelt thanks to those followers who reached out to notify us about this acquisition. Your communication is vital to ensuring that we stay informed and united in our mission.

The SaveBurnet.com legal committee is actively working to set up a meeting with Construction Partners Inc. This will allow us to directly address our concerns and advocate for the preservation of our cherished landscape. We believe that open dialogue may lead to a better understanding of their intentions and the potential impact on our community.

For further insights, we have included a link below and under the Reference Material section on our SaveBurnet.com website. The link will display an Investor Update regarding Construction Partners Inc., which details their goals for expansion in Texas. We encourage you to review this document as it provides additional context on the company and its operations.
https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_f65f579c936cff2a2d6c9947835801f9/constructionpartners/db/857/7595/pdf/ROAD+Investor+Update+-+vFinal.pdf

As we navigate this new chapter, let us remain hopeful and united in our efforts. Together, we will continue to fight for the preservation of our precious Texas Hill Country. We are grateful for each of you who stands with us in this noble cause.
Thank you for your ongoing support.

Warm regards,
SaveBurnet.com Committee

update 11 - status and additional information from saveburnet.com

10/18/24

Followers and Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

I hope this letter finds you well. I want to take a moment to update you on our ongoing efforts to protect the Texas Hill Country and provide important information regarding our initiatives.

1. TCEQ Public Meeting Update
As many of you know, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) had previously scheduled a public meeting for December 10, 2024. However, they have since removed all references to this meeting from their website. At this time, we do not have a confirmed date, location, or time for a rescheduled meeting, but we anticipate it may occur in the first part of 2025. A continued delay in Asphalt Inc., LLC's progress is beneficial to our cause, allowing us more time to prepare and gather support.

2. T-Shirts and Yard Signs
We appreciate your enthusiasm in supporting our cause by wanting to display our messages. T-shirts and yard signs are currently available at two local Burnet businesses:

Pickens by Sassy
Address: 901 S Water St, Burnet, TX 78611
Hours:
Friday10 AM–5 PM
Saturday10 AM–5 PM
SundayClosed
Monday10 AM–5 PM
Tuesday10 AM–5 PM
Wednesday10 AM–5 PM
Thursday10 AM–5 PM
Phone: (512) 755-1509
The Sign Shop
Address: 1844 TX-29, Burnet, TX 78611
Hours:
Friday10:30 AM–5 PM
SaturdayClosed
SundayClosed
Monday10:30 AM–5 PM
Tuesday10:30 AM–5 PM
Wednesday10:30 AM–5 PM
Thursday10:30 AM–5 PM
Phone: (512) 755-0362

All proceeds from the sale of these items directly support SaveBurnet.com and our mission. Shirts are $15 each and the 18" x 24" yard signs are available for a $5 donation. Larger signs are also available for purchase at the Sign Shop.

3. How You Can Continue to Support Us
We are still in need of additional experts who can testify on our behalf at the upcoming TCEQ public meeting. If you have any names or contacts for experts that you believe could contribute to our discussions, please reach out to us. Your input is invaluable.

Additionally, your donations play a critical role in our efforts. We aim to support our committee members, lawyers, geologists, and other experts on a pro bono basis. However, as we progress, we will require additional funds to hire expertise to adequately represent and testify for us. We have set a fundraising goal of $100,000, and thanks to the generosity of our community, we are currently about 20% of the way there. Contributions can be made through our Go Fund Me page or by sending checks made out to SaveBurnet.com. For further details on donations, please visit our website.

In closing, we want to express our heartfelt gratitude for your unwavering support. We are united in this cause, and together, we will prevail.
Thank you for your continued commitment.

Warm regards, The SaveBurnet.com Committee
SaveBurnet.com

update 10 - the tceQ public meeting

10/11/24

Dear Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

We hope this message finds you well. We would like to update you on the latest developments regarding our fight to stop the proposed rock crushing plant on Hoover Valley Road. Many of you have written in with inquiries about the time and location of the upcoming TCEQ public meeting, and we appreciate your enthusiasm and support.

Tentative Meeting Date - TBD
Currently, the TCEQ public meeting has not been scheduled yet, so we have time to prepare. We want to emphasize that this TCEQ public meeting is just one part of a lengthy process aimed at preventing the establishment of the rock crushing plant. Part of our strategy is to delay this meeting as much as possible. Each and every day we are adding 10 to 20 followers.
As soon as the meeting is officially scheduled and documented on the TCEQ calendar, we will promptly inform all of you and post the details on our website.

Importance of Unified Attendance
It is vital for our community to demonstrate a strong, unified presence at the meeting. Many supporters have recommended and suggested involving local professors, doctors and environmental experts to speak on our behalf, and we wholeheartedly encourage this. Additionally, we invite all our followers to prepare comments to present during the meeting, limited to one or two minutes each.
When crafting your comments, we ask that you focus on:

Economic impact
Environmental impact
Effects on our state parks
Highway safety
Effects on our cherished Hill Country treasures
Implications for tourism, our water supply, and endangered species
Etc.

While we recognize that concerns about property values, noise pollution, and dust are important, we believe that emphasizing broader issues will be more effective in advancing our cause.

Preparation Resources
In the coming weeks, we will draft several sample presentations and scripts that are one to two minutes long, covering various community impacts such as water, tourism, safety, and wildlife. These will serve as templates for your own presentations at the public meeting.
Additionally, we will schedule a dry run meeting in November where you can come to practice and present your comments. We will keep you posted with the exact location and time for this dry run as soon as it is confirmed.

Thank You for Your Support
We want to extend our heartfelt thanks to all our donors for their contributions, which enable us to professionally represent the interests of affected neighbors in Burnet County. Your united efforts are crucial to the ongoing success of our mission to stop the rock crushing facility quarry on Hoover Valley Road.

Together, we can protect our precious Texas Hill Country!

Best regards,
The Save Burnet Team
SaveBurnet.com

update 9 - preparing the tceq public meeting

10/4/24

Dear SaveBurnet.com Followers,

We are reaching out to share a significant update regarding our ongoing efforts to protect our community. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has scheduled a public meeting for December 10th, 2024. This presents us with a crucial opportunity to voice our concerns and advocate for the well-being of Burnet and the Texas Hill Country.

As we prepare for this important meeting, we have a lot of work ahead. Over the next few weeks, we will be providing updates outlining specific actions for our group to take. Our goal is to rally as many concerned neighbors as possible to attend the public meeting and clearly express our concerns. Your speeches should be short and concise, focusing on tangible issues that affect our community's economic well-being and the environment.

We will soon send out guidelines that include key talking points and topics that will help us achieve the most favorable outcome. Additionally, we will provide a list of topics to avoid to ensure our message remains focused and effective.

We hope to have between 1500 and 2000 SaveBurnet.com followers at the public meeting, all proudly wearing Green shirts and speaking as a united voice for the good of our community. Keep an eye out for announcements regarding a scheduled dry run prior to the actual TCEQ Public Meeting, where we can practice and refine our presentations.

To strengthen our position, we are seeking testimonials, documented letters, and expert speakers for this meeting. If you know of any experts—such as professors, doctors, geologists, or individuals with hands-on expertise—who can address the following critical issues, please reach out to them and encourage them to speak on our behalf:

Stability of the area's caves and sinkholes
Additional traffic and safety concerns
Effects from the dust coming from the rock crushing plant
Impact on wildlife and endangered species, such as the Tri-Colored bat and the Fan-tailed hawk
Effects on homes near blasting sites
Watershed contamination
Economic impact on tourism and local businesses (Faulkenstein Castle, Camp Longhorn, Longhorn Caverns, wineries, etc.)

Your support is essential as we engage and prepare these experts to present at the TCEQ meeting on December 10th, 2024.
Together, we can make a significant impact for our community and the environment.

Thank you for your continued commitment to SaveBurnet. We look forward to working together towards a successful outcome.

Sincerely,
Randy Printz
SaveBurnet.com

update 8 - please file an addendum to your tceq protest

9/28/24

Dear Followers of SaveBurnet.com,

I am excited to share some encouraging news about our ongoing efforts to protect our community. As of today, we have collectively submitted more than 4,000 protests and comments regarding the proposed rock crushing plant, with over 350 of those specifically requesting a public meeting. This is a testament to the power of our united voice!

It appears we may have another day or two to submit additional protests to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). If you have already submitted a protest or comment, I urge you to go back and add an addendum to your original submission.

You can use the following statement for your addendum:
"I have previously filed a comment. After further investigation into the proposed plant location, I am adding to my original comment and requesting to have a public meeting on the proposed Rock Crushing plant."

It’s important that we drive up the number of requests for a public meeting, as this will significantly strengthen our position.

We anticipate that the public meeting will be held in either December or January, and once the final date is determined, we will notify everyone well in advance. The more people we have attending the public meeting, the greater our impact will be.
Please visit SaveBurnet.com to access the TCEQ link and instructions for filing or amending your protest.

Thank you once again for your unwavering support and commitment to our cause. Together, we are making a difference!

Randy Printz, Affected Neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

update 7 - the fight against the proposed rock crushing plant continues

9/23/24

Dear Friends of SaveBurnet.com,

Thank you for taking the time to submit your protest against TCEQ Permit #176835. We know many of you are asking, “I’ve filed my protest, so what’s next?”

Filing your protest was an important first step, but it’s only the beginning of what will be a long and determined effort to prevent the construction and operation of the rock crushing plant off of Hoover Valley Road. We, the committee and our dedicated volunteers, are working diligently behind the scenes with experts and officials in several key areas, including:

Fish & Wildlife: We are collaborating with wildlife biologists and ecologists to assess the potential impact the rock crushing plant may have on local species and habitats. Disruptions to wildlife migration patterns, water quality, and natural vegetation could have lasting effects on the local ecosystem.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: The Corps plays a key role in regulating waterway protection and land use. We are working with them to ensure that no federal laws governing environmental protection, especially those regarding water bodies are violated by the proposed project.
Historical Society and Texas State Historical Association: Preservation of our community’s cultural and historical heritage is a top priority. We are collaborating with these organizations to ensure that any historical or archeological sites in the vicinity are protected from the threat of construction and industrial operations.
Local and State Officials: Our ongoing communication with county and state officials is crucial in making sure our voices are heard at the policy level. We are working with them to explore all legal and regulatory avenues to halt or delay the permitting process.
Inks Lake State Park & Inks Dam National Fish Hatchery: These natural and recreational resources are integral to the local community and economy. We are concerned about potential impacts on water quality, air quality, and the tranquility of the area, and are working with park officials and hatchery representatives to protect these important assets.
Texas Parks and Wildlife: As stewards of Texas’ natural resources, Texas Parks and Wildlife shares our concern about the potential environmental harm caused by the rock crushing plant. Texas Parks and Wildlife is the administrator of Longhorn Caverns. Together, we are reviewing the project’s potential impacts on local wildlife and conservation efforts.
Texas General Land Office: The GLO oversees public lands and resources, and we are working with them to ensure that public lands are not adversely affected by the plant’s operations, which could lead to long-term environmental degradation.
Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA): The LCRA is tasked with protecting the water supply and environmental resources of the Colorado River Basin. We are engaged with them to monitor any potential threats to the quality of the water supply and the overall health of the river and its tributaries.
Local Wineries (Torr Na Lochs, Uplift, & Perissos): These local businesses not only contribute to our local economy but also depend on the pristine environment of the Hill Country for their operations. We are working with them to amplify the economic argument against the plant and to raise awareness about its potential impact on tourism and local agriculture.
Longhorn Caverns: A geological marvel and significant natural resource, Longhorn Caverns is at risk of being negatively affected by nearby industrial operations. We are consulting geologists and conservationists to determine the extent of the threat to this natural wonder and are preparing a case to protect it.
Texas Wildlife Association: As an organization dedicated to the conservation of wildlife habitats across Texas, TWA is helping us raise awareness and gather data to show the negative effects this project could have on local wildlife populations and natural resources.
National Park Service: The National Park Service is a partner in helping us understand the potential broader regional impacts, particularly regarding conservation efforts and the protection of natural resources that cross state and federal boundaries.
Geologists and Environmental Scientists: The unique topography and geology of the Hill Country make this area especially sensitive to industrial operations. We are consulting with geologists to explore how the blasting and crushing of rock could disrupt the area’s fragile karst formations, potentially leading to issues like groundwater contamination and sinkholes.
Texans for Responsible Aggregate Mining (TRAM): TRAM is a statewide coalition focused on ensuring that aggregate mining operations are conducted responsibly. We are working with them to utilize their expertise and connections to push back against this permit and advocate for more stringent environmental reviews.
Protect Texas Hill Country: This advocacy group shares our mission of protecting the unique beauty and resources of the Hill Country from overdevelopment and industrial encroachment. We are partnering with them to organize community events, raise awareness, and mobilize more residents to take action.

Together, we believe this proposed plant will have a significant environmental impact on our community, our water supply, and our local wildlife. Numerous studies and thorough reviews must be conducted before any construction can begin, and we are committed to ensuring this process is followed to the letter.

We stand united with a common goal: to protect our beautiful Hill Country and preserve the quality of life for everyone in our community. Rest assured, we are in this for the long haul, and we will continue fighting for as long as it takes.

Your continued support is invaluable, and we appreciate everything you’ve done to help so far. Please stay tuned for updates on the next steps and ways you can continue to be involved in this vital cause.

Thank you again for your commitment and for standing with us to protect the Texas Hill Country.

Sincerely,
Randy Printz, Affected neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

udpate 6 - do you need help filing your tceq protest?

9/20/24

Dear Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

I want to take a moment to thank each of you for your continued dedication and support as we work together to protect our community from the proposed Rock Crushing Plant. Your involvement has already made a tremendous impact, and we are grateful to everyone who has taken the time to raise their voices and submit a protest on Permit #176835 to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

However, we understand that some of our members have reached out, either through email or at our recent Town Hall meeting, expressing that they need help navigating the protest process. To ensure everyone has the opportunity to participate and that no one is left behind, we have arranged a way to make this process as smooth as possible for you.

Cooper Wilson, a dedicated committee member of SaveBurnet.com, has kindly volunteered to assist anyone who needs help filing the protest. He will have a computer available and ready to go this Sunday, September 22nd, from 1–3 PM CST, at Pickens by Sassy, located at 901 S. Waters Street (Hwy 281). If you haven’t yet submitted your protest or need help with the process, we encourage you to stop by during this time.

This is an important opportunity to ensure your voice is heard. Filing a protest with the TCEQ is a crucial step in our efforts to prevent this permit from being approved, and your participation could make all the difference. Whether you need technical support, assistance with the wording, or just reassurance, Cooper will be there to guide you through the process.

Thank you again for your unwavering support and commitment. Every action we take, no matter how small, brings us closer to achieving our goal of safeguarding Burnet. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions, and we look forward to seeing many of you this Sunday.

Together, we will continue to make a difference.

With appreciation,
Randy Printz, Affected neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

update 5 - summary of the sept 14th meeting

9/16/24

Dear Friends and Supporters of SaveBurnet.com,

We want to extend our deepest gratitude to each of you for your incredible support and attendance at the September 14th meeting. With over 750 local residents from the Burnet area showing up, your presence sent a powerful message: our community is united and determined to protect Burnet from the proposed Rock Crushing Plant.

This meeting was a critical step in our ongoing efforts to raise awareness, share vital information, and strengthen our collective resolve. Randy Printz delivered an informative and detailed presentation about the proposed plant, including its size, hours of operation, and proximity to our treasured Texas landmarks. Understanding these details is key as we move forward in our efforts to safeguard our community.

Our Q&A session, expertly hosted by Fermin Ortiz, was enriched by the participation of representatives from Texas DPS and Burnet County Deputies, who addressed safety concerns and provided valuable insight into the potential impacts of the plant.

We were also honored to hear from several distinguished guest speakers:

Burnet Mayor Gary Wideman shared the importance of standing strong as a community.
County Commissioner Jim Luther emphasized the county’s role and our ability to influence change.
Stacy Smith, representing State Representative Ellen Troxclair, reaffirmed our local government’s awareness and involvement.
Martha Tyroch, representing Texas General Land Office Commissioner Dawn Buckingham, highlighted the broader state perspective on land use and environmental protection.

Their words of encouragement and commitment were inspiring, reminding us that we are not alone in this endeavor. Our local officials and representatives are hearing us and standing with us.

The success of this meeting was made possible by you—the concerned citizens, the advocates, and the supporters who continue to show up for Burnet. Your engagement, your questions, and your passion for this cause are what make this movement so powerful. While we know there is still much work to be done, the energy and unity we witnessed at this meeting prove that we are on the right path.

As we move forward, let’s continue to stay informed, connected, and resolute. Every voice matters, and together, we will ensure that our community’s best interests are protected.

We stand united in our goal to protect the heart of Burnet from the looming threat of the Rock Crushing Plant, I want to take a moment to express my deepest gratitude and unwavering confidence in all of you. Your dedication, passion, and resolve have already made a difference, and together we will continue to move forward, step by step, toward a brighter future for our community.

The journey ahead will not be easy. We know that battles of this nature can be long and challenging, often filled with moments of doubt or frustration. There may be setbacks, obstacles, and times when it feels like we are losing ground. But I want to remind you: every battle, whether won or lost, is part of a greater struggle. Our goal is not just about stopping one plant from being built; it's about standing up for the health, safety, and well-being of our families, our neighbors, and future generations. We are working to preserve the natural beauty of Burnet, to ensure clean air, and to protect the legacy we leave behind.

In every movement for justice, the path is rarely smooth. But the strength of a community, its resilience, and its ability to come together in times of adversity are what carry it through. This is our strength. Each of you is a crucial part of this effort, and it is your voices, your actions, and your determination that will continue to fuel our desired goal.

It is important to remember that progress is not always linear. Some days will feel like giant leaps forward, and others may feel like steps back. But every moment we spend raising awareness, gathering support, and advocating for our cause is a victory in itself. And ultimately, no matter the individual skirmishes, ... we will be triumphant.

There will be victories, both small and large, along the way. Whether it's a court ruling in our favor, a delay in the plant's construction, or new supporters joining our cause, each step forward brings us closer to success. And when the challenges feel overwhelming, remember that we are not alone. We are a powerful, united community standing together for what we believe is right.

Stay the course. Keep pushing forward. Even when the road seems long, know that your efforts matter. Know that you are part of something much bigger than yourself, and that together we are making a lasting impact.

Thank you for your commitment, your courage, and your steadfast determination.

REMINDER... We have about 10 days left for everyone to file a protest with TCEQ, please see SaveBurnet.com or Save Burnet Facebook for details.

In solidarity and hope,
Randy Printz, Affected neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

update 4 - need everyone to attend saturdays meeting! info below:

9/12/24

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to invite you to an important town meeting regarding a serious issue that will affect all of us in the Burnet area—the proposed construction of a Rock Crushing Plant in our city. This meeting will be a critical moment for our community to voice our concerns and stand together in opposition to this development.

Meeting Details:

Date: September 14th, 2024
Time: 2PM - CST
Location: Hill Country Fellowship Church, 200 Houston Clinton Dr. , Burnet TX
Special Attendees: Mayor "Gary Wideman and other city officials, as well as lots of media coverage

Why Should You Attend?

Environmental Impact: Rock crushing plants are notorious for releasing dust and harmful particles into the air. These pollutants can damage local ecosystems, wildlife, and even our own health, leading to respiratory issues, allergies, and other long-term problems.
Quality of Life: The constant noise, vibrations, and truck traffic from a crushing plant can disturb the peace of our town, lowering property values and reducing our overall quality of life. This could affect our homes, schools, and businesses.
Water Supply Concerns: Such facilities often consume large amounts of water and have the potential to contaminate local water sources, threatening our precious natural resources.
Safety Hazards: Increased industrial activity brings increased risks, including traffic hazards from heavy trucks, and potential accidents that could put our families and children in danger.
Community Unity: This is our chance to come together and let city officials know how we feel. The decisions made in this meeting could shape the future of Burnet for generations to come. If we don't make our voices heard now, we may lose the opportunity to protect our town from this harmful development.

Your presence is crucial! Please join us to stand united against the building of this Rock Crushing Plant. The more voices we have, the stronger our message will be. Together, we can show our officials that we care deeply about the future of Burnet and its residents.

Feel free to share this email with friends, neighbors, and anyone who cares about the future of our city.
Looking forward to seeing you there and making a difference together!

Sincerely,
Randy Printz, Affected neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

update 3 - call for action - need everyone to file their protest on tceq website

9/6/24

Urgent Call to Action: Burnet Residents Urged to Protest Rock Crushing Plant on Hover Valley Road

Burnet, TX – Local residents are rallying to protect their community from a proposed rock crushing plant slated for Hover Valley Road. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is currently reviewing the permit application for this facility, and concerned Burnet residents are being urged to file a formal protest.

Why Your Protest Matters:

Environmental Concerns: Rock crushing operations can produce significant dust and noise pollution, which may adversely affect air quality and the overall environment in Burnet. This could lead to potential health risks, including respiratory issues, for local residents.
Economic Impact: Reduced visitor enjoyment at attractions like Longhorn Caverns and state parks, as well as decreased appeal for local wineries, could lead to a decline in tourism revenue. This, in turn, could affect the local economy, which benefits significantly from these attractions.
Community Well-being: Burnet is known for its scenic beauty and peaceful living. The addition of a rock crushing facility may disrupt the tranquility of Hover Valley Road and surrounding neighborhoods, affecting the quality of life for many.
Wildlife and Natural Habitat: State parks and Longhorn Caverns are home to various species of wildlife that thrive in undisturbed natural environments. The construction and operation of a rock crushing plant could disrupt these habitats, potentially displacing wildlife and affecting local ecosystems.
Regulatory Oversight: By filing a protest, residents can ensure that the TCEQ thoroughly reviews the potential environmental impact of the plant and considers alternative solutions. Protests can prompt additional scrutiny and may lead to modifications or even the rejection of the permit.

How to help:
We need all of you to submit your written protests to the TCEQ before the September 27th deadline. The protest should include specific concerns and how the rock crushing plant could impact the community. It is crucial for all residents to make their voices heard to protect their environment and way of life.
Please log on to the TCEQ site and let your concerns be known (Website Link is Below). Please take action now, must be filed by September 27th, 2024. Use Permit #176835

www14.tceq.texas.gov/epic/eComment/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.welcome&error1=You%20must%20enter%20a%20permit%20number.

Your participation is vital in safeguarding Burnet's future. Stand up for your community and ensure that your concerns are considered in the decision-making process.

For more information on how to file a protest and details about the proposed plant, please go to SaveBurnet.com or Save Burnet facebook page.

Randy Printz, Affected neighbor at
SaveBurnet.com

update 2

9/3/24

Dear neighbors of Burnet,

We have a lot going on each and every day, below is a summary of activities and Important information on the Sept 14th town meeting "We need a large turn out".

Before getting into the details I would like to call out Nan Manning from Camp Longhorn. Nan has been working tirelessly on multiple fronts calling her contacts, meeting with various officials and helping to organize the meetings. In addition Nan and the camp longhorn team will be placing an electronic sign on FM 3509... making all drivers aware of the pending Rock Crushing facility. Sincere thanks to Nan and the Camp Longhorn team.

Jay, Cooper and the team are having signs made up and starting tomorrow (Sept 4th) they will be placing them along various properties on FM 3509 and in the town of Burnet. In addition there will be flyers printed that will go in the windows of our Burnet businesses.

Our GoFundMe page is up and active as of 6PM today (Sept 2nd) we have raised $5200. Special thanks to all of you that have contributed. This is a great start but we have a long way to go. Please please send the link or encourage your friends to donate.
https://gofund.me/b48bb5b8

There was a very nice write up in the Daily Trib "Residence Protest Burnet Rock Crusher"
https://mailchi.mp/dailytrib/residents-protest-rock-crusher-near-burnet?e=265edce43b

Some more good news, our congresswoman Ellen Troxclair has sent a letter to TCEQ requesting a public hearing with the citizens of Burnet. We will keep you informed on this upcoming meeting.

Lastly, please make sure to attend the Town Meeting on September 14th at 2PM at Hill Country Fellowship Church, located at 200 Houston Clinton Dr.
There will be guest speakers and lots of media coverage... so we need a good turn out!

Please continue to check our website at SaveBurnet.com and our Facebook page Save Burnet for updates and information.
In closing, I know this can be a stressful time and we all love our neighborhood... Please remember to be polite when posting or commenting on various social platforms. We are all in this for the long haul and together we will succeed

Randy Printz, Impacted neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

update 1

9/2/24

Dear neighbors of Burnet,

I would like to thank each and everyone of you for taking time out of your holiday weekend to attend our meeting. It was great to see so many informed and concerned residents that truly care about our community. We had roughly 200 attendees and we have email information for a little over 150. We also had about 60 attendees who said they are available to perform volunteer work and about 40 who said they would be able to help out monetarily.

For those who can volunteer; in the next week we will send out a list of items that we need help with.

For those who may not have the time, but are willing to help out financially, we have set up a "Go Fund Me" page. Link is below:
https://gofund.me/b48bb5b8

Below are a few pictures of the meeting, it was standing room only. I anticipate each public meeting will get bigger and bigger. We will send out an announcement when the next meeting will be.

I would like to call out just a few of the wonderful neighbors who have already helped out so much.

Jay Folta, who made the signs, rented the room and made numerous calls to get all of this kicked off.
Larry Black and Fermin Ortiz, who have been through this process before and who have won! Both Larry and Fermin have a wealth of knowledge and have been great to work with. We are all lucky that they have decided to help our cause.
Maylin LeGualt, who has been taking notes and performing research.
Tara Axley, who pulled together a great PowerPoint presentation, deed documents and lots of other helpful information. I will get it posted to the web-site as soon as I can.
Cooper Wilson, who built the SaveBurnet Facebook page which includes our go fund me information. Cooper is great to work, glad he is our neighbor. Below is the link and the QR code to the SaveBurnet facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/523318286870870

Randy Printz, Impacted neighbor
SaveBurnet.com

Email Updates